Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
    • good you are getting there. Lloyds/TSb...i certainly would not be risking possible off-setting going on if a choice were there, but in all honestly thats obv too late now..., however..you might not never be in that situation so dont worry too much. regardless to being defaulted or not, if any debt that is not paid/used in 6yrs it becomes statute barred. you need to understand a couple of things like 'default' and 'default notice' a default is simply a recorded D in the calendar section/history of a debt, it does not really mean anything. might slightly hit your rating. the important thing here is a default notice , these are issued by the original creditor (OC) under the consumer credit act, it gives you 14 days to settle whatever they are asking, if you don't then they have the option to register a defaulted date on your credit file. that can make getting other credit more difficult. and hits your rating. once that happens, not matter what you do after that, paying it or not or not paid off or not, the whole account vanishes from your credit file on the DN's 6th b'day. though that might not necessarily mean the debt is not still owed - thats down to the SB date above. an OC very rarely does court and only the OWNER of a debt can instigate any court action (Attempted a CCJ) DCA's debt collection agencies - DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS they have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's TYPE. an OC make pass a debt to a dca as their client to try and spoof people into paying through legal ignorance of the above statement. an OC may SELL on an old debt to a DCA/debt buyer (approx 10p=£1) and then claim their losses through tax write off and their business insurance, wiping their hands of the debt. the DCA then becomes the debt OWNER. since the late 70's dca's pull all kinds of 'stunts' through threat-o-grams to spoof a debtor into paying them the full value of the debt, when they bought if for a discounted sum (typically 10p=£1). you never pay a dca a penny! if read carefully, NONE of their letters nor those of any other 'trading names' they spoof themselves under making it seem it's going up some kind of legitimate legal 'chain' say WILL anything....just carefully worded letters with all kinds of threats of what could/might/poss happen with other such words as instruct forward pass... well my dog does not sit when instructed too...so... DCA's SOMETIMES will issue a court claim, but in all honesty its simply a speculative claim hoping mugs wet themselves and cough up...oh im going to court... BIG DEAL DCA - show me the enforceable paperwork signed by me...9/10 they dont have it and if your defence is conducted properly, most run away from you . however before they do all that they now have to send a letter of claim, cause the courts got fed up with them issuing +750'000PA speculative claims and jamming up the legal system. so bottom line is two conclusions.... if you cant pay a debt, get a DN issued ASAP (stop paying it!) make sure it gets registered on your file then it stops hurting your file/future credit in 6yrs regardless to what happens (bar of course a later DCA CCJ - fat chance mind!)  once you've a registered DN , then look into restarting payments if the debt is still owed by the OC, if SOLD to a DCA, don't pay - see if they issue a letter of claim (then comeback here!).        
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Claimform - Old Vanquis Card Debt - poss SB, - now N244 for SJ


gd47

Recommended Posts

This MAY be relatively straightforward!

Had a Vanquis credit card and the last payment I made was July 2nd 2014.

County Court summons was issued 29th October 2020.

Could this be regarded as statute barred (have been suffering from serious health problems, which is why I haven’t dealt with it already).

Many thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell Claimform - old Vanquis Car Debt ummons

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell Claimform - Old Vanquis Card Debt

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd

 

Date of issue 29/10/2020

 

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for –

 

1 The Defendant entered into a Consumer Credit Act 1974 regulated agreement with Vanquis under account reference (16 digits) (‘the Agreement’).

 

2 The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and arrears began to accrue.

 

3 The Agreement was later assigned to the Claimant on 23/09/2019 and notice given to the Defendant.

 

4 Despite repeated requests for payment the sum of £519.00 remains due and outstanding.

 

And the Claimant claims 

a) The said sum of £519.00

b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.114, but limited to one year, being £41.52

c) Costs

 

What is the total value of the claim?£690.52
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?Not sure, but probably.
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?No
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?N/A

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?Credit card.
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?After April 2007
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?Probably online.
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?Only showing as Lowell... no default mentioned (ClearScore site).
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.Debt purchaser.
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?Yes.
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?Not sure.
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?Not sure, but don’t think so.
 

Why did you cease payments? Ill health.
 

What was the date of your last payment?02/07/2014

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?Yes...advised of long-term health problems 
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's interesting ...

so the debt shows on your credit file under lowells, which is correct as lowell name will replace that of vanquis upon sale, but, vanquis should have defaulted the debt before or upon sale, and you say there is no default date showing?

 

did you receive the notice of assignment letter 23/09/2019?

What was the date of your last payment?02/07/2014

 

so why did vanquis take 4yrs to sell it and never default around  oct 2014 when they should have...

 

but eitherway...the debt is statute barred IMHO ...so our SB defence is in order me thinks

that should kill the claim dead

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your extremely quick reply...very much appreciated!

 

I’ll check out all I can about the SB defence and submit my reply here before sending it to the court.

 

Do Lowell’s usually continue regardless if a SB defence is submitted or do they cut their losses and give up?

 

Oh, and do I still ask for the CCA or would it be a waste of time in this case?

 

Once again, many thanks for your invaluable assistance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how confident are you upon last payment date?

please don't do anything yet without checking here 2st....yet.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very confident of the last payment date...managed to download all bank statements which prove it.

I’ll just hold fire on anything unless I post it on here first.

 I presume I should acknowledge service or should I wait until nearer the deadline, which I think should be about another 15 days (but am prepared to be corrected!).

Very many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must acknowledge service by Monday 16th 4.00pm.

I would try checking Experian/Equifax /Etc see if they throw up a date.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Many thanks for the replies so far...all extremely helpful.

Here’s an update...

Completed AOS online on 12/11/20.

Now here’s a question that I can’t find an answer to.

 I’ve received an email from the NHS stating that I’m classed as “extremely vulnerable “, etc. and I shouldn’t leave the house for any reason.

Under the circumstances, could I request the CPR 31 information via email (normally, I would ask via recorded delivery post, but I don’t have anyone who could visit the post office for me, as it’s quite far away). This has also prevented me from requesting a CCA.

 I believe my defence should be submitted by Thursday, but will welcome any further advice.

Very many thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is never wise idea to give a DCA nor their dogs your email AD no.

they'll file important docs 1 min before any deadlines to trip you up.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would this be a suitable defence (many thanks dx100uk...found it in the Legal Success forum)...

 

....

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on 29/10/2020

 

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. 

.

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

.

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £690.52p or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

When should I submit my defence (acknowledged service online on 12/11/2020)?

 

Many thanks.

 

Sorry, another thought has crossed my mind...

would it be a good idea to apply for summary judgment, as their claim has very little prospect of success?

Would it put pressure on them to discontinue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need for SJ no that costs you money too:pound:

the SB defence should kill it dead.

 

you don't need to file that until day 33 ...monday by 4pm

but there is no harm in filing now.

 

just copy and paste that to MCOL.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

An update...

Firstly, season’s greetings to all...let’s hope 2021 is far better for everyone than 2020!

 

Received acknowledgment of receipt of my defence from the Court saying that it was being served on Lowells (letter dated 24/11/20).

 

Today I have received a copy of the directions questionnaire from Lowells and also a letter saying that they have agreed to mediation and suggested that I should agree (and also asked me to put forward an “affordable settlement” arrangement, which may avoid me having to pay more costs being added to my “debt”).

 

 I really can’t understand why they are pursuing a statute-barred debt.

 

What should I do now..

.is there any point in referring them to the FCA or any other body, now they have been informed that the debt is statute-barred?

 

Should I phone them and explain to them in no uncertain terms what the situation is?

 

Many thanks to all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Submit your DQ when you get it and state no to mediation because its statue barred and nothing to mediate over.

Nothing else dont contact anyone.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Unredacted

hidden

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay...so

 

What was the date of your last payment?02/07/2014

 

Default Notice issued was sent 11th June 2015 allowing until 30th June 2015 to rectify arrears

Cause of Action 1st July 2015

 

Claim Issued 29th Oct 2020

 

Period of breach to DN issue 11 months

Period of time from last payment to court claim issue ...6 years 3 months.

Period of time from DN issue to court claim issue ....5 years  10 months

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Still wondering what to do!

 

Here’s a quick summary of the facts so far...

This refers to a Vanquis credit card with a £250 limit.

Due to illness, I stopped paying on 1/7/2014 (which I informed Vanquis).

 

Evidently, a default notice was issued on 11/6/201, very nearly a year later.

 

Lowells have dismissed my “statute barred” defence, stating that the six year period runs from the expiry date of the default notice, which would be six years after 1/7/2015.

 

Having read the statement of account which Lowells provided, at the time of my last payment the outstanding balance was £245.

 

During the period from my last payment to issuing a default notice, a total of approximately £212 in late payment, over limit, billed finance and repayment option plan charges were applied.

After the issuing of the default notice, a further £217 of charges were added.

 

My questions are:

1.Even though I have submitted my defence to the court, do I have any grounds to dispute the charges applied?

2.Are Lowells correct in their statement that the six year statute barred time limit starts from the date of accrued action (1/7/2015)?

 

Any advice very gratefully received.

Many thanks in advance.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1.only with the OC..and it's not ONLY penalty fees following the default, any fixed sum fees are unlawful whenever they were charged and can be worthy of note and the interest at the card rate they caused.

could be mentioned in your WS but thats IF it gets that far.

 

2.as andyorch pointed too the OC took 11mths to register the default, again we've seen lowells run away and discontinue days before it's due in court.

 

what is the status of the claim on MCOL?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your quick reply dx100uk... much appreciated.

As requested, this is the state of proceedings from the MCOL site...

 

A claim was issued against you on 29/10/2020

Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 12/11/2020 at 12:54:51

Your acknowledgment of service was received on 12/11/2020 at 14:05:17

Your defence was submitted on 24/11/2020 at 04:35:00

Your defence was received on 24/11/2020 at 08:05:38

 

That’s all!

Hope this helps...I must say I feel a little out of my depth at the moment!

Once again, very many thanks.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 30/12/2020 at 11:33, gd47 said:

Today I have received a copy of the directions questionnaire from Lowells 

 

it might well be that the courts are still delayed due to xmas/covid etc, but going by the status above

it LOOKS like the claim is stayed so tough luck lowells... it will cost them £255 to raise an N244 and lift the stay now.

 

we've seem this from lowells time and time again before now, they send stuff our early to intimidate and harass, with all this huff n puff on how powerful they are, with offers of settlement cause a defendants defence in their eyes is soooo weak...but actually they do not send it to the court themselves or discontinue just before any hearing to avoid costs.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

open

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you use PDFmerge listed in our upload guide and put all those in one mass multipage PDF

else we'll be here all day downloading single pages

 

you also must redact claim numbers and pers info.

 

posts hidden

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice dx100.

Hopefully everything will work properly now you’ve pointed me in the right direction!

This is what I received in the post this morning…

don’t know if it’s actually from the Court or Lowells ( no return address or indication of sender…I thought the Court correspondence had some information on the envelope).

any advice as to how to proceed would be very gratefully received (and acted on!).

Lowells seem to be very persistent with this!

N244 Granted+N180.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...