Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court Claim Against Hermes raised - damaged goods ***Settled in Full at Mediation***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1156 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well this is where you decide if you want to spend the extra money pushing the case forward – but if you don't then you lose everything now. So assuming that you want to go ahead, you complete the form. You tell them that you want it held at your local court because you are a private individual and they are a business.

Then probably you should agree to mediation.

Once you sent this off, start reading around the forum about people's mediation experience – and in particular have just had a report today that somebody has been gagged – prevented from talking about their mediation experience. I feel certain that this is Hermes who have imposed this as part of the settlement agreement. Mind you, the claimant got pretty well everything they were looking for – so it was simply Hermes testing and testing and making trouble.

Please read up all the various mediation stories on the sub- forum. There are some very useful information – but this new attempt by Hermes to gag people from reporting on how the mediation went is new.

We would suggest that you resist this then you tell Hermes that if they insist on gagging you at mediation then you will go to court and they won't be able to gag you when you get the judgement which will do them far more damage than simply reporting back on how a mediation went.

It seems to me that Hermes are getting backed into a corner. They are very stupid company

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have already filled in the questionnaire and asked for it to be in a court near me. Sent it off a week or so ago. The questionnaire they have filled in and sent today - this is where I have seen they have agreed to mediation and requested the hearing to be near them. There was no mention of gagging?

 

I assume from your above post this post I just need to read about mediation...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it happens – then it will happen at the mediation negotiation where personal they will try to knock you down to reduce the value of the claim. They will try to withhold your court expenses and at the end they will try to say that they will pay the money on condition that you agree not to say anything about the mediation process that you have been through.

It's up to you whether you want to stand your ground and tell them no on all counts and that you will go to court – or if you want to compromise either on the gagging agreement or even on the amount of money that you are seeking.
I think they have no grounds for forcing you to do anything. I think your position is very comfortable

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Court Claim Against Hermes raised - damaged goods
  • 5 weeks later...

Thank you for the update. Well done.

What a nuisance they are to make such a song and dance about a relatively small sum.

If you get a moment maybe you'd be kind enough to give us a reasonable blow by blow account of the mediation process. You might have read the accounts from other people – if you fancy doing the same kind of thing it would be helpful.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • BankFodder changed the title to Court Claim Against Hermes raised - damaged goods **WON**

Ok.

 

Got a phone call asking for me to layout what had happened. I had prepared a list of bullets so just read them and summed up at the end. Got a call back to basically say they agreed to pay - there wasn't any too or fro. I guess they realised it was silly taking this to court after all!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

No pressure from Hermes to reduce your claim?

No pressure from the mediator's compromise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Court Claim Against Hermes raised - damaged goods ***Settled in Full at Mediation***
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...