Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot - Old Lloyds TSB Credit Card


vivian.
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1128 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On 3 February 2003 I opened a credit card account with Lloyds TSB.

 

In May 2009 I defaulted and the proverbial hit the fan and the debt was passed to Cabot.

 

Any PPI was investigated by the Citizen’s Advice Bureau back in 2009 and all was found to be above board.

 

I have since that time continued to pay £1 every month to Cabot without sending any details of my income mainly because my circumstances never changed.

 

Recently I have received a letter from Cabot Financial.

They’re considering legal action as they require an update about my situation.

If they do not hear from me within 28 days my account will be placed with their solicitors whereby they will send me a “Letter Before Action” and subsequently a court claim will be issued against me. It details all the threats of a CCJ and the outcome from obtaining that would bring, including a warrant of control – enforcement agents (bailiffs) will visit me at home for the money or remove goods.

 

I am unemployed but not claiming benefits.

Do not own any property or goods of any substantial value, only a second hand bicycle and this computer bought in 2012.

 

I’m not too concerned about a CCJ and I’d rather get this done and dusted after all these years of waiting for such a letter from Cabot.

The debt today stands at £9500.00

 

Perhaps the next step should be send a SAR to Lloyds and a CPR 31.14 to Cabot…. And await the claim form.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you should have sent the fleecers a CCA request the moment they bough the debt

instead of blindly paying a powerless DCA and running the Statute Barred date to infinity.

 

do it now.

 

and read their letters carefully

doesn't say WILL anything 

 

see the red bits below about DCA's 

if you can't see them.

tell me..

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

must send a letter of claim first via the 2015 pre action protocol...

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

thank you.

 

sent Lloyds a SAR request and Cabot a CCA on 5 November 2020.

 

It all took some time but briefly, I received a letter from Cabot at the end of January.  It said they were unable to obtain the CCA from Lloyds, the original lender, but if this information becomes available to them later, the will  complete my request and send me the relevant information.  Cabot go on to say that until they can supply the information requested, my account is unenforceable, and they are not permitted to obtain a CCJ against me.

 

Cabot sent me another letter a few days later with an offer of a 75% discount to help me clear the balance and be free of this account.

 

Lloyds responded with a huge amount of paperwork 3 inches thick.  In the bundle, under the heading "The information attached has been provided by our Credit Card Department", contains 3 sheets of information I'd like you to look at for me.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fleeced blind for 10yrs

 

stop paying ... .no cca=no pay on any debt

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

read upload carefully

use the websites listed there 

pdfruducer, pdf merger.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what you hold is immaterial

it's what cabot produce..

now you know what exists..

 

if/when cabot send you something you'll instantly realise it is obviously a FAKE

and it will be believe you me, they'll raid their filing cabinet, cut n paste your details onto it and send it out.

it will not look anything like what you hold.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

Thank you for your helpful comments….

 

So having looked around at some of the other threads, and reading up on enforceable CCA v unenforceable CCA

 

Am I right in thinking:-

 

A CCA can be a reconstituted (cut n paste) version provided it contains all the same information, as though it were the original CCA with all the terms of the agreement, other than implied terms and prescribed terms applied at the time, for example: stating the credit limit; stating the rate of any interest on the credit to be provided; stating how the debtor is to make the repayments etc, etc, and be legible.

 

However, for Cabot to take me to court, wouldn’t they need the original CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 30/10/2020 at 16:24, vivian. said:

On 3 February 2003 I opened a credit card account with Lloyds TSB.

your debt is pre the CCA 2006 changes

it is not retrospective

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why gulp?

 

are you not understanding what you have so carefully read up on above......?

 

those changes re being allowed to file a recon agreement DO NOT APPLY to your agreement...

its PRE the changes that allows a recon.....(CCA 2006..effective from Apr 2007)

 

so they must send a copy of the actual original agreement you signed.

 

not a  chance :pound:

 

why do you think lloyds sold it on ...think about it....

they themselves could have crushed you in court..but they didn't...i wonder why....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...