Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Erudio debt management


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1254 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Early 90s student loan - SLC. Sold to Erudio . Deferred every year for 23 years.

Then Erudio didn’t send me a referral form the next year.

I rang and they eventually did.

 

The following year I had moved house ,  again no forwarded deferral form came (I had that Royal Mail  forwarding thing in place )

I rang them again and was told I didn’t have an account with them so had no need to defer.  

The man on the phone checked twice and then told me to ring Honors loans to see if I was with them .

I naively thought as it was around 25 years since the first loan was up maybe they had written them all off, I also thought great . 


Fast forward 2 years ish - Erudio start sending me full amount demands (sent onto me by the people at my previous address) and BTW now your loan is not eligible to be written off due to age or longevity as you are in arrears . By then I am furious, upset  and feeling conned.

 

I went to ombudsmen but because I couldn’t prove I made the call (I had free calls at that time and they only kept records of those that incurred a cost - also I had 141’d before I rang them) and erudio couldn’t find their record ... I was therefore not successful.  I clearly remember the call and I absolutely made it.

 So next I did the stupid thing ... They didn’t have my address , they didn’t have my up to date name , they didn’t have any bank account details so I did nothing, didn’t pay anything and seethed. Silence reigned for approx 4 years . 

 

Next I receive a letter to my correct address but still an incorrect (old) name, from both Erudio and Drydensfairfax solicitors asking for a large amount of money and a date by which I must provide this. This date has now just passed. 

 

Do I respond or ignore ?

I can find no links on any of my credit reports to the name I have now and the name they have.  

They do though have my address , I have no idea how, I assume it was from the people who live at my last address).

 

Am I really going to have to make an instalment plan to pay these people who I feel conned me into defaulting on this loan.

I never and still do not earn the amount required to start payments . 


Do I put my hands up and send them a request for the original credit agreement and then open myself up to whatever they do next ? or do I imagine they are still fishing ? As I am sure many others are I am finding this shockingly stressful, both the monetary concerns and just the absolute unfairness of the whole system !!

 

Please advise . 
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What year did you last defer payment?

 

Stay OFF the phone from now on, as you have found out to your cost, unless you have everything in writing you have absolutely no evidence, unless you are able to record your calls?

 

Deferring payment ''could'' be seen as acknowledgement of the deb, so when exactly was this?

 

Have you ever written to them acknowledging this debt at all?

 

 

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep last deferment date please?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so not SB's then

 

is this a letter of claim with a reply pack or just a std threat-o-gram please

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you scan just the letter to PDF please just to be sure

read upload carefully.

 

but safe to say you won't be paying anything

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thst not a letter of claim 

its just a std threat-o-gram that DCA's send out either themselves or get their dogs to do it.

 

erudio are arrows DCA in sheeps clothing

no dca are bailiffs

and have 

zero legal powers on any debt no matter what oy's type.

 

let it run.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well TBH you've blindly been following their lead some of which has done you no favours in a way

but

it's better you understand the complete picture.

 

there are 100's of threads here 

the more you read the stronger we become

thats far better than simply telling you 

so what if they do issue a court claim....as you won't understand why i say that.

 

a dca has no more powers than you or i

anyone can issue a speculative claim against anyone if they think they are owed money

 

the reason why you have that letter is because they don't have your correct address in WRITING from you.

they are hoping it too gets ignored and they might issue a request for northants bulk to raise a claim against you using the last informed address to them or SLC you did in writing

 

hoping for a default undefended rubberstamped judgement where no human is involved and nothing is checked - a roboclaim.

 

having re read above, i revise my advice.

simple write to drydens

 

re dryden ref number

 

please note my correct address as above

 

thankyou.

 

thats it .

 

then let it run until or unless you get a letter of claim with a reply pack.

that is NOT a court claim. but should be replied too.

 

go read a few threads here in this forum you found on CAG.

get upto speed.

 

then comeback with any questions.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should NEVER run away from debt in this new millennia digital age.

 

that includes debts on your credit file even if they should no longer show

before you know it  backdoor ccj will be attained

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 if other details match and this is as a result of say a marriage then yes.

CCJ's are not against an address.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

thanks for your help, I’ve sent the letter.

I am worried though that I won’t know what to ignore and what to not?

 

Will the notice of claim be marked as such ans can I post back on here if I get one? 


Also- how do I know I haven’t had a CCJ already ?

I just can’t quite understand why they would wait this long ?

thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 23/10/2020 at 20:18, dx100uk said:

thst not a letter of claim 

its just a std threat-o-gram that DCA's send out either themselves or get their dogs to do it.

 

erudio are arrows DCA in sheeps clothing

no dca are bailiffs

and have 

zero legal powers on any debt no matter what oy's type.

 

let it run.

 

dx

 

 

On 23/10/2020 at 20:33, dx100uk said:

then let it run until or unless you get a letter of claim with a reply pack.

that is NOT a court claim. but should be replied too.

 

go read a few threads here in this forum you found on CAG.

get upto speed.

 

said it twice now - a letter of claim..click and read

 

fleecers leave things until near SB date so as to wrack up maximum interest they can get on the debt

 

as long as all your debt owner on any debt that you might have used/paid within say the last 7 yrs have in writing been told of your correct and current address, and all of your old addresses are showing on your credit file as linked addresses then you should be ok.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello, I have a letter of claim

now, the amounts I owe against each year don’t look right but I can’t be sure as I don’t have any of the original paperwork . Which template do I use from

the letter of claim thread please? And am I disputing or asking for more details ? 
thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

click letter of claim

follow post 2

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

read all the posts in the CCA link

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...