Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
    • That's an idea on Maquarie. On being accountable, you also have to blame Ofwat and possibly the Environment Agency although they've been badly defunded. I put the Frost article up for balance.  
    • I agree HB, but there were no laws broken - its perfectly legal to fleece the UK and its infrastructure - and labour were little better than the Tories Perhaps an option would be to ban the aussie investment fund from the UKs markets
    • surprised you gave that frost article the light of day HB Long been the case that no further evidence of his wing-nutishness needed. Heck he even railed against the rubbish grate deal he largely created
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Frankie vs Lloyds


frankiefrankie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6237 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well I got a phone call today from the branch - she says that they don;t deal with DPA requests, and it will have to be sent to Andover??

 

She says I'll hear from them in the next few days to acknowledge reciept of the letter, but has anyone else heard this from Lloyds TSB?

 

Frankie.xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing wrong with sending your first letter to your branch and then they will forward it on to the right department.Just stick to the time limit you set :)

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

if you only have a week to go then send them a short reminder ..stating they only have until XX date to comply with your SAR .. as soon as the 40 days are up then start the process for non compliance

 

I would not phone them but always keep your corrospondence to letter / email .By phoning them you are just showing them you are nervous or impatient and this can lead to problems for you in the future .. just have patience and stick to the time limits you set and while your waiting read around this forum as much as you can

 

keep us posted :)

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I managed finally to get the statements online. I still haven't received my paper statements, but the charges on the online statements add up to £1897!! Writing up my prelim request for repayment today to send tomorrow!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OK I received the usual standard bumf sod off letter today. I know I'm 2 days ahead of schedule, but can I send my LBA now, or do I have to wait until the 14 days has elapsed even though they have confirmed they're not willing to refund me? Please help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Good luck Frankiefrankie! Am currently at same stage as you on behalf of my Dad. Will be filing MCOL early next week.

.·:*¨

:-) ¨*:·. Blueberrys .·:*¨:) ¨*:·.

 

We are all in the gutter but some of us are looking at the STARS****

:roll:

 

If I've helped please click my scales !

:p THANX!!!

 

HalifaX PLC ***WON 24.11.06 - REFUNDED £666.94 after MCOL***

 

First Direct ***WON - REPAID IN FULL 3.11.06!!!***

 

Barclays ***WON - REPAID IN FULL 31.10.06!!!***

 

Lloyds TSB (Dad's) ***WON***14.05.07

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I need help. Been away for a few days and there's a letter fro Lloyds here (I did MCOL on Friday 23rd) saying they;ll refund me £750 out of the £2300. They say they'll credit my account in the next few days. Looked today and low and behold - there it is. There is nothing in the letter stating that I accept the money in full settlement, so what do I do now?

 

Do I send Lloyds an acceptance letter stating that I am still after the remainder? How do I change my claim with MCOL? Please help!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Frankie

There is a choice of letters in the link below to send them:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejection-settlement-offer.html

 

I wouldn't change the amount on MCOL, but I'm not sure whether you need to notify the Court or not, sorry:confused:

Have they acknowledged your claim yet?

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, as Barty said there's no need to amend the value of your claim. I'd send a short note to the court to inform them that the defendent has made a part-payment, something like this -

Court Manager

**** County Court

Address

 

[date]

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

[You] -v- Lloyds TSB Bank Plc

Claim No:*******

 

I refer to the claim as detailed above, in which I am the Claimant.

 

I wish to notify the court that on [date] I received payment in the sum of £750 from the Defendent as a part-payment in respect of this claim.

 

I have sent a letter to the Defendent accepting this sum on the clear understanding that it is a part-payment only, and that this claim will continue to be pursued to a hearing, or alternitively untill such time as a satisfactory settlement is reached.

 

Yours faithfully

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So last week I sent letters to Lloyds and MCOL detailing the £750 received and that I am still climing the remainder.

 

Today I received a letter from MCOL stating that Lloyds have filed an acknowledgment of service and now have 28 days to file a defense.

 

What do I do now? Do I wait for them to file their defence?

 

Frankie.xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Yes wait for them to enter a defence. When they have, you will receive a copy of it, and an Allocation Questionnaire to fill in, these couple of links should help you fill in it:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/57708-draft-order-allocation-questionnaires.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

 

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Presumably its the standard 9 point "service charge" defence then, yes? Nothing to worry about, your claim is progressing exactly how it should.

 

Use the links Barty provided for you for help with the AQ. The new strategy (draft order) is definately preferable, but only if you understand its requirements.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...