Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The time has come to "crush" lloyds..


HSBCrusher
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5163 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello folks here in lloyds.

 

I have been wanting to sort out my lloyds accounts for some time, but some website has been taking up my time....:rolleyes:

 

Anyway, they have provided me with some extra motivation today. A dd was due yesterday, I paid in more than enough to cover it in cash, when the branch opened that very morning. It was made clear what the money was for, thats OK said the cashier.

 

Letter came today.

 

Returned the dd due to lack of funds! Yep, as I did not manage to pay it in at midnight, (as the branch opens at 9.30 :rolleyes: ) they returned the dd.

How is it possible to pay in money at midnight I ask you?

Had a delightful conversation with an idiot on the phone (not all bank workers are idiots by the way, but this one was). I said, OK, if my mortgage goes out on the last day of the month, as I get paid on the last day of the month, would that be returned?

No.

Berks! :mad:

 

Statements all ready, spreadheets ready, first letter ready.

I will be claiming for a current account, and a credit card.

 

Crusher is coming Lloyds... coming to crush you!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Go crush em crush!! You'll probably find Lloyds are a bit tougher to beat than HSBC though - you may even need the plunger;)

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best of Luck Crush!! I'm sure you will have no problem beating Lloyds...Happy New Year!!

 

R22

Prelim Sent 30/10/2006

LBA sent 13/11/2006

Court Claim submitted via Moneyclaim 06/12/2006

Claim deemed served on 11/12/2006

No acknowledgement by 25/12/2006 (14 Days)

Entered Judgement by Default 28/12/2006

Issued Warrent 15/01/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just registering my interest (compounded Contractual of course) !!;)

 

Have a Great New Year !! :D

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Crusher

We have exchanged views last couple of days

 

Some of my observations regarding past posts and your present battle with LTSB.

with reference to Citi shall we not assume there is at least 1 trojan in each of the banks threads?

Giving this would it be an idea to disguise amounts,location,name, up and until serving court papers?

I am about to launch LSTB claim can I pm you with a request for your view as the claim has a twist?

You have followed and commented on the member with the 55k claim should he not be advised to keep really sensitive and ground breaking data to select view?

Just my thoughts -C

LSTB (business) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) received 10th Dec prelim + Contractual interest claim sent 10th Jan07 £5k + change

Received partial reduction mount of £5,563 against loan & overdraft of £18k i.e. 30% reduction. Next step PPI's & managed loans. Jan 07

 

LSTB (Girlfriend) prelim sent 10th Jan07 1st account £670

Received partial refund into account of £457 9th Feb, sent rejection letter. donated 5% 10th Feb

LSTB (Girlfriend) prelim sent 10th Jan 07 £1,450

HSBC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 27th DEC (approx £3000)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I didn't say before but my LBA went in more than 14 days ago, so it's time for mcol.

Here we go again.:)

 

I will get it sorted out tonight.

 

On your comments C...

 

yep, I agree, really confidential stuff is best kept under wraps.... but really most of the information is out there already. I would always advise that users do not use real names as user names.

And yes, I know that bank workers do come on here and look. But I do think this works both ways. If they see that a claimant knows his/her stuff inside out, they know that perhaps a "tough cookie" might just as well get settled sooner rather than later.:D

 

Did you pm me by the way?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everybody. This is the absolute first time that I have ever joined in a forum so hope I get it right but I am so furious about Llloyds heavy handidness over the years and their exorbitant charges. I was finally driven to action by the success of the chap featured in The Mail this week who sent in the baliffs to his local bank - power to the people! Have found the info on this website really useful. Luckily I have all my statements but it has taken me two days of filing to sort them out and was stunned to see the amount I have put in the pockets of Lloyds. As I have nothing to lose by starting action, I am fired up and ready to go!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent! Welcome to our forum!

 

Be sure to really read up well, as lloyds are not the easiest. There are links in my signature if you need them.

 

You will get your money back if you put in a little bit of work..:D

 

Crusher:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its amazing how quick lloyds will issue their charges and no matter how logical or obvious your argument is they will just charge first.

 

This proves it is automated.

 

The one that sent me over the edge was about a year ago I organised a holiday for me and some friends.

I made the payment on my credit card and then the friends give me back the money (in the form of a cheque) which I put into my account.

Now I waited 3 days for the cheque to clear, thent went onto my bank account website, and instructed the bank to make a payment to my credit card.

Now in fairness I should have checked that the cheque hadnt yet cleared, (there must have been some more minutes that they can get extra interest from keeping it from me uncleared) anyway I didnt notice the difference between account balance and available balance.

 

But this is the thing that really got me.. I had waited 3 days but it was not quite there, apparantly if you dont deposit a cheque early enough in the day then that day does not count in the clearing process, and then this bugged me even more, the ammount that I instructed them to pay was the exact same ammount as the cheque, so to me it seemed completely obvious that the funds were going to be there, it was just a couple of hours out of time. GGRRRRR!!!! needless to say they bounced the cheque and I went overdrawn!!!

 

I could not believe they treated me like this, I tried to complain to them but whats the point.

 

Anyway good luck with your claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny.

I was going to do my mcol last night, its way overdue. It was so late in the evening though, I decided to to it today.

Good job I put it off one more day, I got a letter with a refund in full, the charges and interest charged on those charges! :-D There was no other interest included as I requested, but as I see it this is as far as I can push it. If I now proceed to court I will effectively just be fighting for the interest, this would cost me the mcol fee etc etc. Best leave it here.

I checked the bank, it's in there already!

 

Now, on with the credit card....... :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good work Crusher.;) Same just happened to me in my second LTSB claim. I was late filing MCOL and they paid just before I did!

 

Do you mind me asking how much the claim was for?

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...