Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1300 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A few days ago I was caught attempting to leave a large supermarket with a trolley of unpaid goods. I also did this a few days previously but didn’t get caught. I was stopped by security and my world fell apart. I’ve been going through a breakdown recently. Not an excuse I know. The shame and remorse I’m feeling are incomprehensible. The police were called and because this was a first offence I was given a recorded warning and they were very kind and told me to put it behind me and move on. What I didn’t share was that I carried this out a few days earlier. I am beside myself with worry as the store kept my store card (used for scanning shopping). I am very concerned that they will look at past visits which I’m sure will be recorded by my store card and view cctv and see previous shoplifting occurring. I’ve recently been out on antidepressants and have started attending counselling. The question I have is can the store chase me for precious shoplifting by reporting me to the police if they go back and view cctv given they have my name and times I’ve visited the store. Are they likely to do this? This has been one massive wakeup call. I have so much to loose from this. I have a job which requires a clean police record and I love my job. I am sick with worry. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few days ago I was caught attempting to leave a large supermarket with a trolley of unpaid goods.

I also did this a few days previously but didn’t get caught.

 

I was stopped by security and my world fell apart.

I’ve been going through a breakdown recently.

Not an excuse I know.

The shame and remorse I’m feeling are incomprehensible.

 

The police were called and because this was a first offence I was given a recorded warning and they were very kind and told me to put it behind me and move on. What I didn’t share was that I carried this out a few days earlier.

 

I am beside myself with worry as the store kept my store card (used for scanning shopping).

I am very concerned that they will look at past visits which I’m sure will be recorded by my store card and view cctv and see previous shoplifting occurring.

 

I’ve recently been out on antidepressants and have started attending counselling.

 

The question I have is can the store chase me for precious shoplifting by reporting me to the police if they go back and view cctv given they have my name and times I’ve visited the store. Are they likely to do this?

 

This has been one massive wakeup call.

I have so much to loose from this.

I have a job which requires a clean police record and I love my job.

I am sick with worry. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me again.

 

Well, it sounds as if this has been enough of a shock for you to stop the shoplifting now.

 

I think you should discuss this with your counsellor and your GP next time you see them, to try and get to the bottom of what made you do it.

 

It's highly unlikely that the store will do anything retrospectively, the main thing is for you to make sure you pay for your shopping. If possible, you could go to a different supermarket where you don't feel as if they know you.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never ever will.

To be honest when looking back I don’t recognise myself over the last few months.

 

Do you therefore think it is unlikely for more to come of this?

I’m just incredibly concerned store will investigate further and pass on to police and my warning could be upgraded to a higher level charge? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are no instances of stores doing this .

 

go have a chat with you GP etc.

always worth it.

 

one thing worth mentioning.

 

you will get scary letter from an org called RLP or it might be DWF.

you TOTALLY IGNORE THEM.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply.

I really appreciate you taking the time to reply.

I’m really struggling with the shame and remorse of it all.

I don’t recognise myself for what I’ve done.

 

I appreciate your reassuring me that the store are unlikely to take it any further.

I think my thoughts have been going to crazy places about what could happen if they check my store card for when I was last there and then view cctv to see previous incident. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they will not waste hours of staff time reviewing CCTV card use etc.

to what end, they find you have gotten a few more items..not worth it.

 

i didn't say they were unlikely ...they won't, there are no examples of this ever.

 

they are not even slightly interested in domestic shoppers with the odd few items

they concentrate on organised gangs and serial career shoplifters only.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no the supermarket don't contact the fleecers.

 

their head office would have stupidly signed up all their stores to these powerless and useless services .

 

use our search top right

and type it RLP and read up.

much better than endless single point questions.

 

it will answer everything for you 

but i will underline again.

you DO NOT EVER CONTACT THEM.

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...