Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi slick!    On 22 July they said they would refund me £74.07 Theres no DD in place as my membership was a once off payment in November last year.  Hi Dx,    I paid through PayPal last year as a one off payment. 
    • I'm trying to understand it all but I certainly tend to agree with my colleague @dx100uk that it looks as if you may have been taken for a ride. You found an advertisement for a bag on an online sales site. Instead of going through the established procedure of that site, which presumably allows them to recover a commission from the seller you started dealing directly with the seller who is an unknown person to you and of course that allowed the seller to avoid paying the commission. At whose suggestion was it that you went off-site? You then pay by PayPal but instead of logging it with PayPal as a payment for a purchased item, you tell PayPal that it was actually simply a gift or transaction between friends and family. This also allowed the seller to avoid paying a PayPal fee on the money. At whose suggestion was it that you paid in this way?       I don't say that you definitely have been scammed, but it doesn't look very good. This is how it might have happened: after you agreed to take the transaction off-site, so you lost the protection of the established system – and the seller avoided the commission and also avoided the sales site knowing that they had sold their item, you then agreed to pay the seller some money – but not for a purchase – simply as a gift. This has two consequences. Firstly, the seller avoids a PayPal fee and secondly, because PayPal has been misled as to the purpose of the payment, you lose the protection of PayPal if it turns out that you've been scammed or there is some other problem with the transaction. The seller then apparently sent you the parcel and they sent you pictures of a package with your address on it. Separately they sent you a Hermes tracking number – but there is no evidence that the package was actually posted to your address. The seller might simply have taken a picture with your address and sent that to you by way of reassurance – and then changed the label and posted the parcel to themselves but sent you a tracking number which is inaccessible to you and in respect of which you will be prevented from getting any information. All you've seen is a parcel with your address on it. All you've been given is a tracking number which satisfied you for a while until the parcel did not arrive and then when you started to make enquiries, you found that you were unable to access any details referring to the tracking number. Of course the tracking number says that the item was delivered – because maybe it was – but in that case it was delivered to the address on the parcel which might have been the seller's own address – or the address of a friend. I don't want to say that this is definitely how it happened, but it is a plausible scenario. Of course Hermes is an awful lot of parcels – but on the other hand I expect that most of the parcel is that going to Hermes hands are delivered successfully. We only get the bad stories on this forum. I can imagine that Hermes rate of successful deliveries is better than 97% because otherwise people wouldn't simply just hate them, they would go out of business.   We can help you bring a complaint against Hermes if you want. However, on the basis of what you say, the odds are stacked against you but it would be useful to try and find out the address which was associated with tracking number. As far as your apparent willingness to travel hundred and 50 miles to ask for your money back, don't bother. If you did actually go there, are you sure that the seller actually lives at the address that you have been given? What evidence do you have that? Of course if you found that the seller didn't reside at that address then it is slamdunk that you have been scammed. But then what are you going to do? You can try to inform the police but of course it won't get you anywhere. You can inform the sales website – but they will say that you brought it on yourself because you agreed to go off-site. You can inform PayPal – that they will say that because you sent the money which was calculated to avoid their fees, you have lost the protection. If you travelled the 150 miles and found that the seller did reside at that address, do you really think that they are going to hand your money over to you? If they are acting dishonestly then they will simply say that it is nothing to do with them, that they addressed it all correctly and they don't understand what has happened and that this is simply Hermes up to their old tricks. What are you going to do? You simply risk getting into a very nasty argument and depending on how bad it went, you might even find that the police are called and I'm afraid that they would be looking at you – not the seller. Maybe you can answer the questions that I've post above as to who it is who initiated the various ways of doing business.    
    • The legal campaign's going well then. The recount in Wisconsin gave Trump more votes but Biden even more, at a cost of $3m. And a donor to the organisation bringing the failed cases is suing to get his $2.5m back.   https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/28/joe-biden-gains-votes-in-wisconsin-county-after-trump-ordered-recount
    • Yes Unicorn feed tax again, can't sue the keeper for more than the Original Charge, so any additional Debt Collection fees aka the £60 they add is abuse,iof process as per HHJ Harvey at Lewes county Court What lookedinfroinfo is indicating is that the main signage on entry and dotted around is merely an " Invitation to Treat", not the offer, the Offer and Acceptance occurs at the payment machine, so wording there is key.
  • Our picks

Just Cash Flow PLC business bank personal guarantee Court Claim.


Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Just an update - N181 all done and filed - SAR returned 

main thing that JCF plc are relying on - is that the business contract itself is the personal guarantee, however 

 

in contract-

execution section 7.1  clearly state -DOGI (deed of guarantee and indemnity) to be signed in wet ink and legal advice document from solicitor returned

execution section 7.2 clearly states - debenture to be signed in wet ink and returned.

 

neither of these were done as i told my broker that i would not personally guarantee or raise debenture (have emails to prove)- and the SAR prove these documents dont exist. The SAR also proves the lending report states DOGI and debenture must be obtained and 'is ok by client' (lies)

 

so they are seeking to rely on the business contract itself creating the guarantee and indemnity  -as they dont have the contract referenced DOGI or debenture, as they were never presented, done or signed and SAR proves this.

 

now my argument is - if the contract itself creates the guarantee and indemnity then why are these clauses and documents listed, stated and required in the contract detail. because if the contract is the guarantee and indemnity , there is no need to reference or list as documents to obtain (ie there is no need for them) and they are clutching at straws.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it doesn't

no signed PG ...judge will throw it out.

not seen one go any otherway here.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But the way they have wrote the contract- which the agreed and confirmed in SAR is a standard non negotiated document 

states 

party 1 - borrower Ltd busines

party 2 - Mrs xxx (guarantor )

party 3- Mr xxxx (guarantor ) 

 

so they are saying this narrative is enough - 

when I am saying it’s irrelevant as our intention as per contract law - was not to personally guarantee - as we have correspondence to prove we asked not to, and they didn’t provide the Dogi and debentures as they normally do when a guarantee is required . So I’m relying not just of the missing docs but English contract law of - offer acceptance, And Intention of parties etc 

 

and just to note I have dealt with this Co before - same exact loan product different company - now paid off 

And there was a dogi and debenture Attached that time - so Then and us both know this time these parts were omitted in this instance at our request 

 

but also to note -

one of the alleged ‘guarantors’ has not signed in a personal capacity - their copy missing as per SAR - also 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Andyorch changed the title to Lloyds business bank personal guarantee Court Claim.

ive had a general form or judgement or order - im confused

 

its says

upon reading the claimants application

IT IS ORDERED THAT

The claim be transferred to the county court at xxxxxxx(my local court) for the application to be listed for hearing (on notice) and served

 

no ive not had any application paperwork served on me or anything and this order was made without a hearing.

 

then received 10 days later a notice of transfer of proceeding -to all parties

As a result of an order made on the xx of sept this claim has been transferred to the county court of xxxxx (my local court)

 

so what the hell has the claimant applied for ?

a move of court nearer them which was denied, or something else

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like a std N157 to me.

they applied for nothing

cases are always transferred to your local court you put on the N181.

the claim is thus naturally proceeding as it should.

 

have you a date yet?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

N154 Notice of allocation to fast track .....N157 is Small Claims Track......but there should be no need for any application after DQs submitted...I surmise that this may be an application for Summary judgment /Strike out of your defence.

 

I would contact your court and ask for a copy of the claimants application in connection to the Notice of General form of Judgment/Order.

There are time constraints in which you have time to respond to their application.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s fast track - no confirmation of allocation, case management anything - it will be months and months 

 

so

Confused as to why they made an application and I got An n24 

 

im more intrigued , what did they apply for ? 
they’ve made an application for something 

 

I’m on hold to court now to find out 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 20/08/2020 at 12:42, Andyorch said:

Just Cash Flow PLC

so trying to force things through by SJ negating anyone carefully looking at any enforceability issues in the paperwork they do/not have....crafty just like all the UAE claims. 

 

did the same at PAPLOC stage too.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • dx100uk changed the title to Just Cash Flow PLC business bank personal guarantee Court Claim.

Yes - just got off phone to court -

theyve applied for summary judgment

 

money claims ordered it needed a hearing at local court - spoken to local court , they said doesn’t matter what other judge said 

their judge will look at it and decide if it needs a hearing or not 

 

I’m so angry with this one I put on a bullet point defence and I have a massive strong defence to be submitted upon allocation and witness at stage etc 

that the judge now will not see before making a decision on whether to allow summary judgement - 

 

please tell me they don’t give them out easily and most of the time allow a hearing instead 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Andyorch said:

There are time constraints in which you have time to respond to their application.

 

Andy

 

1 hour ago, MOSS 41 said:

the judge now will not see before making a decision on whether to allow summary judgement - 

 

 

object to it then..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They haven’t served me the application or any documents at all 

 

I only know this because I rang the court 

 

protocols don’t apply To  them apparently 

 

 

they haven’t followed any rules -

just pressure all time 

but I have a defence and I’m entitled to have my time in court with it 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, MOSS 41 said:

ive had a general form or judgement or order - im confused

 

its says

upon reading the claimants application

IT IS ORDERED THAT

The claim be transferred to the county court at xxxxxxx(my local court) for the application to be listed for hearing (on notice) and served

 

no ive not had any application paperwork served on me or anything and this order was made without a hearing.

 

then received 10 days later a notice of transfer of proceeding -to all parties

As a result of an order made on the xx of sept this claim has been transferred to the county court of xxxxx (my local court)

 

so what the hell has the claimant applied for ?

a move of court nearer them which was denied, or something else

it will tell you on this doc how to object i think

you have 7 days i think too.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - it was , didn’t say what application for 

 

how can I object if have no knowledge of what application they have done , just that ordered to be listed for hearing - seven days up yesterday according to latest post 

 

I’m happy

to have a hearing , just don’t want judgment without a hearing 

 

I just want the opportunity to defend myself - 

Money claims judge ordered a hearing - that’s fine 

but local court saying ,

doesn’t matter it’s what our judge says -

that’s what worries me 

 

why do I have to be on speed dial to court because the claimant ignore all

procedures and protocols 

 

the application should have been served with their evidence to me 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have been served a copy of the application and their witness statement in support of said application.....thats Northampton's error...have you requested a copy as I advised in post # 39 ?

 

You will need a copy to respond with your witness statement in response...and there will be a hearing....summary judgment applications cant be dealt with without a hearing.

 

You will be allowed to submit your statement and evidence in objection you normally file this within 7 days of the hearing.

 

Come back when you have copies of their N244 and statement.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have raised a complaint with CCMCC and cc'd in my local court for the case file , that CPR 23.4 was breached by the claimant (another breach)

(not serving me the application)

and the court failed to serve me the application meaning i lost my right to set aside, vary or stay.

 

also requesting a copy of the application and their evidence.- as ive still no idea what they have done or written.

 

its so frustrating the claimant, just tries to side step me all the time (keep me in the dark)

and i know the costs they will put forward will be ridiculous 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the reason they went for the application (still not yet seen) is because I put in a small bullet point defence on this one - knowing. I had plenty of time in the future to give ‘ full’ legal agreement and defence with evidence , the bullet  points

1.contest the validity of the personal guarantee 

2. Submissions made to claimant have failed  to provide a copy of personal guarantee which they seek to rely upon

3. material concerns in respect of the initial loan agreement and the way it was handled by claimant 

4. it is my intention to raise these concerns with the court so I am fully aware of legal remedies available to me. 
5. I consider there is sufficient evidence that my case meets the requirement of an unfair relationship (consumer credit act) 

 

 

I have lots of lots of evidence to completely elaborate the above with references to Specific areas of law and case law - emails, lending reports, prior dealings with the company, variations and release of securities  and amounts , missing deed of guarantee and indemnity , no consideration, missing items from prescribed method of acceptance and on and on and on........

 

Will I  have a chance to present And submit this  all this evidence before a hearing for application of summary judgment , or should I file an n244 application to Amend defence Giving full defence right at the offset? Attached to defence form?
 

due to the short notice and 7 day window to set aside (which I missed as not served on me til much later - I have complained to court)  - it means the claimant  applied asking for no hearing and serving no notice on purpose !

 

however order and  notice of allocation to my local court for an application hearing( on notice and served) has been made 

does that mean the judge disagreed to hear without hearing and me being served and has ordered a hearing on which I must be given notice and served 

 

Denying their request to decide without hearing and serving me notice (sneaky buggers) 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps post a copy of your defence verbatim here ....if it is anything like your bullet points above then I doubt it was CPR compliant ....hence their application for SJ/SO.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noted - I didn’t write it , I paid someone else to do it !!    Livid !

 

how can I control the situation ?

debt specialist who would apparently do it all for me - Said keep it brief , we do the rest later - cost a lot too !

 

whats my next step- ask for amendment of defence ?

 

Thanks for response - how is it not cpr compliant,

how can I sort this ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post a copy here.....and I will explain why it's possibly not complient....

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, i have spoken to barrister, who reiterated what you said, its no defence and  not answering anything, so i need to apply and pay for application an amended defence (i have constructed the amended defence with his help)

 

so do i fill in the whole defence docs again N9b attaching my new defence pages 

 

with the application notice as a covering document?

 

is there a template on here on how to fill out amended defence application and draft order i am asking for .

 

its a good legal defence made with barristers help, they should allow this amendment if i explain the circumstances right?

(i understand i might have to pay costs to the other side because of application due to bad defence-how much would this be?)

 

on to the other case with these savage beasts, trial  listed march 2021, this is the one where signed copies of my husbands personal guarantee doesnt exist- CPR 31.14 done and SAR, they dont hold one.

and the document, containing thee terms and details to create a guarantee in my name is missing again SAR and CPR 31.14 done, they dont exist.

 

should i do an unless order- provide these documents or have case stayed struck out, or does that rock the boat?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No...no applications at the moment re amended defence...or unless orders....your defence has been accepted by MCOL. You need to deal with drafting a statement in response to their application for SJ and treat this as a separate entity.If you dont deal with this correctly its irrelevant what your initial or proposed new defence states because it wont get to normal trial.

 

Have you now got copies of their N244 and statement ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No- I asked ccmcc, that said as it’s been transferred you have to wait for them to send you an application we didn’t have to copy you in,

 

I’m so confused , barrister said I must put in application for amended or it will be struck out as a bad defence - a witness statement will not replace your defence - which should have been correct in the first place 

 

I’m trying to get copy of n244 , no one is doing it

 

how about I send a letter asking for permission to enter an amended defence to claimant ? If so , would I include the defence so they could decide wether to continue with the hearing or not ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore me was on a small screen

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...