Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Just Cash Flow PLC business bank personal guarantee Court Claim.


MOSS 41
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 980 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

They asked for summary judgement without hearing - which they didn’t get - a hearing was ordered , does that mean the court isn’t convinced on the face of it , enough to grant the judgment ?

 

i can write a witness statement - do I write a witness statement directly in response to the points they raise - 

rather than when I defend the case as a whole which would me much longer and comprehensive witness Statement on all points 

 

or do a long one here (application hearing)  , with covering skeleton argument sheet ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 284
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Not particularly...all applications for SJ/SO require a hearing..its something that cant really be judged without a hearing....put that down to lack of experience or ignorance to try to save £155.00 ...whichever.

 

Yes you do draft a statement in response...as I have already advised..which must be submitted not less than 7 days pre hearing.

You can use the basis of your proposed defence above...if there are any important points they have decided to conveniently leave out....but its far better to be directed by the points of their statement and what they will be relying on...it must be formatted same as theirs and finished with a statement of truth.

 

Witness statements do not require a Skeleton Argument.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou - 

 

i shall do as advised , any tips or tricks to make sure summary judgement avoided 

 

for instance , I read judges don’t like to award judgments when edit complex matters are involved etc , so that would a clear point to provide evidence on - with the falsified debenture affecting execution etc 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Allegedly ......Well thats something for you to address within your statement backed up by evidence by way of exhibits...I have had to edit your previous post referring to this amongst other remarks please refrain from making these statements within your posts and putting the forum at potential risk of liable remarks.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

so i have manged to get the unilateral notice removed against my property, as i did a UN4 and said they cannot provide evidence of a personal guarantee, they obviously couldnt and didnt , so the notice was removed by the land registry

 

They are just now 17/11/2020 gone a re registered the exact same unilateral notice again!!

so i have finished doing yet another UN4, to remove yet again.

 

How do i stop them repeatedly doing this without merit? i spoke to the land registry who said nothing they could do, as they are just a registration service and register anything that gets sent.

 

This is unfair and an abuse of the land registry charges system.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How much is the court fee for submitting the  UN4 ?  Perhaps consider issuing them a court claim to reclaim your fees and inconvienience.

 

https://www.irwinmitchell.com/news-and-insights/newsletters/im-on-the-money/im-on-the-money-issue-two/unilateral-notices-exploding-the-myths

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Un4 are free to do - anyone can register an interest in the property , and its just as easy to remove if its not valid

 

but i have to remortgage within next six months and they cause issues, so i suppose my 'damaged' would be going on a variable rate mortgage instead of a deal as i wont be able to remortgage with this 'charge' if they keep repeatedly applying it.

 

I just want them to stop, they have failed to validate but land registry have nothing in place to stop these behaviours which just seems wrong. like a cease and desist etc , but these people are still trying to bully me into paying by any means possible. even though they dont have the guarantees/paperwork to win in court, im happy to get to court 

 

as s4 of Statute of Frauds 1677 personal guarantees must be in writing and signed - which they dont have

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Cancellation of a unilateral notice is when the owner of the estate of which the unilateral charge is registered against applies to the Land Registry for the notice to be cancelled. This is a completely free process and can be done through the use of the form UN4 to apply for cancellation. When the Land Registry receives the UN4 form, it notifies the individual who is making the claim. This beneficiary is then given fifteen working days to respond to the application, if they would like to object to it. If there is no response within the cancellation period, the notice is cancelled. If there is an objection for removal of the notice, and the parties are unable to reach a mutual agreement, the Adjudicator of the Land Registry is referred for these cases.

 

Quote

However, unilateral notices have a very minimal effect; this is because the unilateral charge on the charges register protects only the most important interest in any property which is ranked by the most important being first registered as a notice.

 

https://www.propertyblawg.com/conveyancing/unilateral-notice-in-property-law-what-is-it-and-when-does-it-apply/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

on another note by 17 dec i need to do a disclosure statement/form- assuming its the actual court one with boxes to fill in

 

which ive never done before , as a defendant what do i write on it? because its all really about what paperwork the claimant does or doesnt hold?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Disclosure list in Fast Track claims is the N265 see CPR 31.6

 

A form of disclosure that requires a party to disclose documents:
 
On which it relies.
That adversely affect its or another party's case, or support another party's case.
That it is required to disclose by a relevant practice direction.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-n265-list-of-documents-standard-disclosure

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part31

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok- I’m relying on the fact the opposition doesn’t have documentation , so what do I fill In? 
 

just tick boxes that I have emails, phone records , covering date xxxxx to date xxxxx?

 

then if they want anything they can ask for a copy ? - I mean the Emails are between me and them really 

 

and a couple from a loan broker 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can only disclose documents/emails that you have specifically referred to within your defence /witness statement which you intend rely on.....it's a very small section on the n265 for the defendant to complete ...just after the signature if memory serves.  It's mostly designed for the claimant.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So I did and served my disclosure yesterday -

Just listed everything in date order I hold , long complete list so I can rely on any of it in my witness statement, 

 

I did not get served the other sides disclosure until today (one day late) and as they seem to use snail mail - I would assume court received it a day late too

 

 

anyhow - considering they are ‘legal professionals’ 

 

they didn’t declare half the the phonecalls they already sent 

The phone calls they did declare were irrelevant and talking about Benign things and another company 

 

also listed a phone call between me and them and it’s not my phone number 

 

the attached list was headed with a different court case reference to n265 

The attached list was a list of items held for another court case for another company - not relevant to the case at all

the date of the loan agreement is wrong that they rely on 

 

they make reference to a social media post held (looked it up , it was sharing a car garages business page for an Aston martin 🤣🤣🤣- what is the relevance not my car or anything to do with me )

 

they haven’t declared a statement of account - if they are claiming money , don’t they need to provide a statement of amount outstanding ?or reference it in their claim and witness statement 

 

its the most unprofessional thing I’ve seen 

 

 

do I point out there mistakes by asking for 

 

1) copy of loan agreement dated ..6/11/2019... (the wrong date) as a copy doesn’t exist On that date 
2)copy of phone all to number that isn’t mine 

3) ask why another companies disclosure list and reference is required in the paperwork etc 

 

 

or save all this for later in the court room 

as if you don’t declare it it’s inadmissible as evidence 

 

i.e they won’t be able to use loan agreement paperwork as they didn’t declare one dated on the correct date 

 

 

do courts overlook major errors like this ?

Edited by MOSS 41
Link to post
Share on other sites

No they dont ...so you simply refute the errors within your witness statement.Try to hold off submitting your statement until the very last moment and hopefully after you receive theirs.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok- I don’t do anything to the last day via email - i rang the court it it’s acceptable to do all my serving by email, 

 

however other side for some unknown reason using snail mail, so I’m not getting served or served late with their documents - as per orders 

 

im going to attach a formal letter asking for what things I want from disclosure in a list (in the seven day window and serve today)

 

I’m tempted to write two opening paragraphs , one stating purpose of cpr and disclosure and ask why they have included other referenced court case documents (lots of them)irrelevant and against the protocol - and proportionate costs 

 

And ask why full Disclosure hasn’t been done as many phone calls and documents they have been served with aren’t listed (they have just picked and chosen certain things which is against disclosure ) 

 

and then serve copy of the court too - for a record of there continuing bad practice and non compliance of cpr which is still continuing 

 

what do you think ?

 

also they will have 7 days to ask me for my documents - it’s Xmas , it’s lockdown, they use snail mail , if they do meet 7 day deadline (they date stuff a week old before they type it) ,to ask- if I don’t receive this request in post for two weeks ie don’t get served it in 7 days 

it will make me late on an order and they would do this on purpose by using snail mail instead of email 
 

shall I include paragraph. In letter highlighting that they continue to serve me late , taking no account over postal systems of delays at this time of year due to Covid and Xmas - so I’ve made a note of it for court docs 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

And ask why full Disclosure hasn’t been done as many phone calls and documents they have been served with aren’t listed (they have just picked and chosen certain things which is against disclosure ) 

 

They are only going to disclose what they consider important to their claim and which their particulars /statement refer to.Things that you may consider important may be irrelevant as far as the claimant is concerned......keep it simple dont over complicate this stage by asking for all and the kitchen sink.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I only need to ask for a couple of things as have everything else - they have not disclosed items (if they hold how or have ever held) documents they refer to in their particulars of claim - or the loan agreement itself - on which they rely

 

But list loads of items that relate to another court case with that court case reference attached and nothing to do with this case 

 

so does that mean the loan agreement they hold and mention on particulars of claim but haven’t disclosed is inadmissible 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

so does that mean the loan agreement they hold and mention on particulars of claim but haven’t disclosed is inadmissible 

 

Afraid so....unfortunately for them...unless of course the Court Directs its disclosure ......without an agreement they have no claim.

 

See CPR Practice Direction 16.

 

7.3 Where a claim is based upon a written agreement:

(1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing, 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t know if they have served the agreement with particulars of claim - because when they served Me my copy of court claim none were attached - 

 

now only one small documents is listed on disclosure (which I already hold and is not enforceable as per my barrister)  and the other agreement not listed (well and agreement is listed with a completely incorrect date many months and days later I.e they have disclosed an agreement dated xxxxx, not the one mentioned in the particulars of claim

 

it’s been a recurring problem with them , that they don’t serve me properly and on time 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well claims cant be served with attached from MCOL...its physically impossible.......

 

Hence CPR PD 16 above.....

 

and the original(s) should be available at the hearing, 

 

But if its not even listed on the N265......its irrelevant whether they have or not.......it cant be relied upon...end of.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have listed the correct two agreements In my disclosure - as I hold them , can they rely on my disclosure to include them when they haven’t listed them ?

 

it’s actually essential for me to do so (disclose them as 1) they exist and 2) they don’t hold a personal signature or all three parties signing the tripartite agreement , and not a personal guarantee under statute of frauds as per my barrister advice 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

 have listed the correct two agreements In my disclosure - as I hold them , can they rely on my disclosure to include them when they haven’t listed them ?

 

Yes they can......you have partially helped them plead their claim...but as you say if they are unenforceable for whatever reason it again becomes irrelevant......unless a judge disagrees with your argument.

 

I personally wouldn't have disclosed them...no agreement is easier to argue than a defective one

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok- they sent me copies of the agreement in letter before action

 

just haven’t attached to particulars of claim or listed in disclosure - I know they have them , so  can’t deny they exist - they just haven’t disclosed at all for whatever reason - but know they will refer to the agreement in court 

disclosed or not 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They may refer to it but they can't disclose or rely on it...as it's not on the N265.......it then becomes here say and a court won't adjudge on verbal evidence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...