Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Can you explain a little bit more about the delivery please. Somebody sent them to you – was it a retailer who sold them to you? If you have to claim against Hermes then if you declared only a £300 value then this is probably what you will have to settle for. You pay £95 shipping costs – that is extraordinarily high for Hermes. Can you explain why it was so expensive.   Have you made a formal claim to Hermes? And have they responded?
    • I'm sorry there are a few typos in my post - a hangover from injuries I had at the time being discussed. I did try to tidy it up straight away but wasn't allowed to repost after editing it.
    • You posted in a solid block of text and it's rather difficult to read. Please will you make sure that your posts future are properly spaced and punctuated and that way people will find it easier to give you the help and support you need.
    • I arranged the delivery of a set of drum kit wood shells with hermes, I booked directly online. They have told me the item is lost 70x50x55 cm box???   They asked me to fill in a claim form which I have done i declared a value of £300 for the parts sent and paid for extra cover. I had recently purchased the whole drum kit for £650 and shipping costs of £95.00 to get them to me.    After investigating the cost of replacing the shells, not a direct equivalent but similar, it will cost around £450.00 with delivery.   I want to get compensation over the £300, is that possible, i have informed them of the total loss with delivery costs, prior to shipping with Hermes as £745.   I am more than happy to go to the small claims court for the difference but would it be dismissed,   Should I go for the full cost of the loss or the cost of replacement shells only I have all the receipts for the drums and shipping costs prior to hermes losing my items.   I still have the remaining parts that a pretty much worthless now, unless i get a new set of drum shells.   Its probably going to to take ages, I've written to CEO of Hermes about my complaint as well just to cover all bases. Next stop will be the small claims court as i read they pull delay tactics and low offers.   They really didnt care and also didn't seem surprised when i spoke to a service agent.
    • Hi all I used to be a member here a few years ago when I went through a bad time - husband and I had bad health, both lost jobs etc, we got the usual helpful and sympathetic response from the bank.   With the help of CAG I did my best to fight back and found that some debts were legally unenforceable as well as the usual defective defaults and everyting else the banks were doing wrong. We're going back to about 2009/10.   With HSBC they refused to provide a SAR/CCA because I wouldn't provide a signature that matched their records. I remember I took the advice from CAG at the time NOT to sign.  in any case, due to my injury I was unable to do anything except scrawl. I told them that I didn't think the SAR required a signature and in abny case I couldn't. In short they refused to cooperate, there as a series of letters but they cited the DPA, at which point I pointed out that they were sending me demands, statements and theatening letters but only now were they saying they had to verify my ID (at that point, the bank said that they wouldn't send any more statements/demands etc until my Id could be confirmed (seriously, you couldn't make it up). I also pointed out that the guidance from the ICO was that if they were responding to the address they has on record and was the usual contact address, they could assume it was their customer writing to them. I even complained to the ICO who, as usual took the bank's side.   Eventually, I said to the bank that if they were unable to give me details of the alledged debt then I was unable to consider their demands and verify the situation and I wouldn't correspond with them any more and they could go to court if they liked. But, if they did lodge court papers, and sent the statements etc I'd immediately complain to the ICO that they hadn't verfied my ID acording to their own procedures (something the ICO had agreed was required), and I'd bring it to teh attention of teh court that they had deliberately not sent me the data to allow it to be resolved one way or teh other. If they didn't send the stuff through discovery, I'd lodge an embarassed defence and ask for it to be struck out as I had been asking for the records for 6 months or more.  I didn't hear any more from them, that was in March 2011.   In Nov 2015 I got a letter from Hoist Portfolio Holdings 2 Ltd that they has been assigned the rights from MKDP LLP and giving bottom Robinson Way's address. I hadn't heard of MKDP before and simply ignored it. I certainly wasn't aware it had be assigned to them in the first place.   A few days ago, I got a letter from Hoist again asking for payment. I intended to ignore it except for a letter I got from the Bank this morning.   The letter is the same one that has been mention on here very recently, a refund from the bank for £25 because they had determined I hadn't recived the correct level of service (no sh*t Sherlock!) The account number is NOT my currect account. It MAY be my credit card, but I seem to remeber they were rolled into one. I don't seem to have any correspondence about the CC, and I destroyed all paper documents a few months ago. All I have is scanned copies of letters (which may not be a complete record, but should be).   I received a letter in Nov 2017 from PRA about another CC saying the debt has been assigned to them (no letter of assignment from the creditor) and in Jan 2018 an 'Annual Statment'. Since then, nothing.   I've made a point of ignoring these kind of letters and demands in the past belieivng they were SB and eventually the data would be destoyed. After a few years of actually being able to relax, I'm now worried that the aggro is all going to start up again with this HSBC and other accounts.   Now, the questions. it is/was my understanding that the debts became Statute Barred a few years ago and they couldn't be enforced. The CC default was issued Feb 2009. A month later a Final Demand was issued for both current AC and CC giving a combined total. (that total is similar to the one sought by Hoist which gives my currect AC number).   So, are these accounts SB? If they are SB and the bank has desposed of them by assignment to someone, why do they still have my name and enough details of my correspondence to determine they didn't behave correctly? Does the DPA not require them to destroy data after 6 years?   On the same DPA note, it seems that this account is simply being passed around from one **** bag bottome feeder to another (maybe teh same one under different names), again, why is data still being processed after 6 years? Am I doomed to be persistely pursued by these scumbags until I die? Or am I worng? Are they able to process data as long as they like, even when there has been no contact for years?              
  • Our picks

PE ANPR PCN - overstay - appeal failed - Wigmore Shopping Centre, Luton, LU2 9TA


Recommended Posts

Hello.

Recently I parked in a private car park attached to a parade of shops/restaurants in Wigmore, Luton, operated by Private Eye.

It had signs saying about 2 hours maximum stay. Stupidly, I thought this was to deter people from parking there as there are offices close by, or to deter people from shopping for too long (big Asda over the road).

 

I had a reservation at a restaurant on site. I parked for 2 hours 14 minutes.

 

When I appealed I attached all my restaurant orders.

I was with my little girl and a friend.

We actually finished up at 2 hours, but by the time I had taken her to the toilet and got her in the car and then drove out it was 14 minutes over.

 

I thought with this evidence, the fact that I was at the restaurant, would mean I was ok.

Who knew restaurants had time limits????

This was at lunchtime also.

 

I just don't know what to do next.

I feel it is really unfair.

I was supporting a local business.

It was 14 minutes.

 

If I pay within 14 days it is £60, if not £100.

But they have completely shut me down.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

please complete the relevant  section of post 1 here

 

 

first thing to remember it is nothing to do with the restaurant.

they didn't nor do employ PE to issue speculative invoices and don't owe the land anyway.

 

shame you appealed as you've now removed your protection under POFA and shot yourself in the foot as they now know you were the driver.

 

there is a grace period of 10min, there is no maximum 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, don't feel you're stumped because PE refused your appeal.  That was always going to happen.  PE and similar companies never, ever accept appeals - ever.

 

In your appeal did you admit to being the driver?

 

It would be useful if you give us the exact address of the car park.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't remember if I said I was the driver or not.

Probably not in the exact words, but by saying I was at the restaurant, as that was my appeal I guess I did.

 

 

1 Date of the infringement 08/09/20

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 11/09/20
 

[scan up BOTHSIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide]

 

3 Date received 12/09/20
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes. A photo of my car leaving the car park, and a close up of my reg plate, stamped with date and time
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Yes. I can't access my appeal, but said I was in the restaurant, along with copies of my online orders (due to Covid protocol), and said with a small child can take 10 minutes to get them in the car, walk to car etc.
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Thank you for your correspondence in relation to the Parking Charge incurred on 08 September 2020 at 14:47, at Wigmore Park District Centre, Luton car park.

 

We are writing to advise you that your recent appeal has been unsuccessful and that you have now reached the end of our internal appeals procedure.

 

This site is a maximum stay car park, as per the terms and conditions as detailed on the signage.

Your appeal has been rejected on the basis that the maximum time allowed was exceeded.

 

Please be advised:  There is an independent appeals service (POPLA) which is available to motorists who have had an appeal rejected by a British Parking Association Approved Operator.

 

Contact information and further information can be found enclosed. See also www.popla.co.uk

 

 As a gesture of goodwill, we have extended the discount period for a further 14 days from the date of this correspondence.

 

If you appeal to POPLA and your appeal is unsuccessful you will not be able to pay the discounted amount in settlement of the Parking Charge, you will be liable to pay the full amount.

 

If you have already paid the reduced amount, the Parking Charge will be increased to the full amount and you will be liable to pay this increase.

 

 By law we are also required to inform you that Ombudsman Services (www.ombudsman-services.org/) provides an alternative dispute resolution service that would be competent to deal with your appeal.

 

However, we have not chosen to participate in their alternative dispute resolution service.

As such should you wish to appeal then you must do so to POPLA, as explained above.

 

A payment can be made by telephoning our offices on 0330 555 4444 or by visiting www.parkingeye.co.uk or by posting a cheque or postal order to ParkingEye Ltd, PO Box 117, Blyth, NE24 9EJ. Yours faithfully, ParkingEye Team

 

7 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Wigmore Shopping Centre, Wigmore Park Centre, Luton LU2 9TA

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • dx100uk changed the title to PE ANPR PCN - overstay - appeal failed - Wigmore Shopping Centre, Luton, LU2 9TA

If you've never been in this position before, it's understandable to think that appealing is a good idea.  You were a genuine customer, you were there with a small child, etc.

 

However, as you can imagine we see a load of cases every week, and the PPCs never accept appeals (from the standard reply I bet they never even read yours).  Even worse, the motorist generally writes something like "I parked in ..." and outs themselves as the driver, whereas previously the PPC only knew who the keeper of the car was, not who was driving.

 

But none of this is fatal!

 

As dx says, there is a minimum ten minutes' grace period.  So the fleecers are after you for overstaying FOUR MINUTES.  An extra four minutes is completely understandable when you have a small child and the necessity of taking personal hygiene very seriously in the times of COVID

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Have never had a parking fine. Really annoys me as would prefer to pay for parking after the event rather than risk any fine. 

 

I appreciate your response. What should I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

See what others suggest too, but I would think that now you should do nothing - regarding PE at least.

 

Over the next few months they will send you various letters that are meant to be threatening, and probably get debt collectors to do the same, no doubt pretending the amount has increased to try to frighten you and then maybe offering a discount to attempt to con you.  All hot air from paper tigers that can be safely ignored.

 

However, if they ever send you a formal Letter Before Action it'll be time to reply and give them both barrels.

 

If Wigmore is near to you it would be useful if you could go and get photos of the signage.  Also get on to the council to see if they have planning permission for their signs.  Actions like this begin to build up a case to undermine PE's rubbish.

 

Oh, and it's not a fine, it's just an invoice from a private company, big difference. 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

let them play

you get lots of scary letters from various people trying to fleece you into paying, including adding unicorn food tax because you haven't

just read the red bits below for how to deal with those powerless muppets.

 

if you ever get a letter of claim.

comeback here.

 

in the meantime the more threads you read in this forum the better.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. How can I see if they have planning permission for their signs? It is £60 to pay now, rising to £100. I REALLY don't want to pay £100. I am part furloughed so money is tight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

who said you'll by ever paying anything.....

 

your local council webportal should have a planning section.

 

signs, ANPR cameras, and the  poles they are on.

 

dx

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. 

My husband thinks I should just pay. I think we have had enough stress this year (various not just Covid), and I think threatening letters, or anything saying about court might tip him over the edge.

I am on the nervous side of leaving it, but just feels very unfair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

Have you read other threads here about Parking Lie as we call them? Loads of people have been threatened and a few have even gone to court but almost no one has paid. Have a look at our Successes thread for people who have beaten them.

 

The threatening letters are just hamster bedding. Would you pay me £100 if I wrote to you? That's about how much power PE have.

 

 

HB

  • Like 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they threaten baliffs as an example, do they send them round? If they threaten court, how likely is it to happen? Appreciate could also ask how long is a piece of string, but the thought of going to court or dealing with that is a bit overwhelming.

 

Will take a look at that thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BAILIFFS can never be involved in anything until you've lost a court case.

 

Stop watching mostly fake tv programmes that have ZERO bearing on a speculative invoice which is not a fine

  • Like 2

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you can pay £60 that you don't owe to a bunch of conmen and have an easy life.

 

Or you can fight them and yes, you will have to put a certain amount of work in.

 

As a campaigning consumer site we would prefer you did the latter!  But it's up to you.

 

The only effort with the future letters is the opening of them.  They're just standard nonsense of which PE send out hundreds every week, hoping to scare the naive.

 

There are 263 successes on the thread HB posted.  That is a vast underestimate as in all 263 cases there was a specific moment to point to when the PPC was beaten.  In many other cases the PPC just gave up but the thread wasn't included.

 

Reasons why PE's claim is rubbish

   - they don't own this land, if you had really done something you shouldn't have with your car it's the landowner who should pursue you, unless they have a contract with PE allowing to issue court claims which they nearly always haven't

   - PE hardly ever bother with planning permission, making their signs illegal

   - the signs are pants, when you pull in there's nothing stated about having to pay £60 for overstaying and they state "only for shopping on site" (so you can't go to the barber's or have a meal then?!!)

   - it's very unlikely that the original planning permission for the car park stated a limit of two hours, personally I'm allergic to shopping but even I could spend two hours there given the range of shops, the eateries, the barber's, the bookies, the pub, etc.

   - if a grace period of 10 minutes is OK in normal times for an adult, 14 minutes is quite reasonable when you have a small child and the three of you had to deep wash your hands before you left (with that queue for the bathroom too ;-)).

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am up that way tomorrow, so will take photos of the signs and post them here. Struggled to see if they had planning permission. Did loads of searches, but the council website, is not easy to find things.

 

Thank you so much

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, most parking companies tend not to bother with getting planning permission.

One reason is that once they have found a company stupid enough to agree to their plan to prevent a few motorists from parking when they shouldn't, they want to get started straight away.

 

Councils often take several weeks before they come to a decision and if they don't agree to the proposals it may take several more weeks before the Council finally agree and when they do agree, it is usually stipulated that motorists can stay park there for. four hours.

 

So being held up for possibly weeks and then not being able to cut the time allowed to park down to 90 minutes makes it difficult for them to earn the kind of rip off figures they like to achieve. So much easier to avoid asking the Council in the first place.

 

Of course this does mean that they are in breach of their Code of Practice which they need to be able to gain access to your DVLA data and also they have breached your GDPR by getting your data from the DVLA.

But why should they worry when the majority of people pay up anyway.

 

You are dealing with out and out crooks who knowingly break the Law time and time again and people out of fear or a desire for a quiet life pay up despite the fact that no money is owed. The lack of planning permission means that their signs should not be there and without the planning permission no contract can be formed between the motorists and the crooks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I went and took a photo of the sign today, so my arguments so far are;

 

Getting penalised for 4 minutes over when using the restaurant.

 

The sign talks about shopping. I wasn't shopping.

 

Sign.pdf

Edited by FTMDave
Image pasted to thread now converted to PDF
Link to post
Share on other sites

who knows that and it makes no odds anyway.

 

hope you got clear photos of the others and the small print.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, JKA_needshelp said:

Struggled to see if they had planning permission. Did loads of searches, but the council website, is not easy to find things.

 

You could e-mail or phone the appropriate council office.  Ask them

   - if PE have PP for the signs, poles & cameras, and

   - if they can show you the original PP for the Wigmore Shopping Centre.  Bet it didn't have a limit of two hours!

 

I've converted your photo to PDF so only registered Caggers can see it, best to keep the fleecers guessing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

from about post 18.

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good grief dx, is there no end to your encyclopedic knowledge  :yo:

 

Brilliant, so no planning permission then.

 

I see in this case PE threatened court and then ran away.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was 2019, and they only had PP up until 2018, so since then they could have of course had PP.

 

Do we know what happened with that person after they were threatened with court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...