Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 20 million quid on just the brokering fee for a crappy deal with the UK public hocked to pay more for PPE - which was probably useless with better and cheaper per item with no 20 million quid fee - available from alibaba Stinks of corruption to me.  
    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
    • That's an idea on Maquarie. On being accountable, you also have to blame Ofwat and possibly the Environment Agency although they've been badly defunded. I put the Frost article up for balance.  
    • I agree HB, but there were no laws broken - its perfectly legal to fleece the UK and its infrastructure - and labour were little better than the Tories Perhaps an option would be to ban the aussie investment fund from the UKs markets
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JNC v. The Black Horse, that is Lloyds TSB


JNC
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6294 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have looked with interest at this site over the last couple of months, thinking is it really worth it.

 

But with just over £150 is to be debited from my account tonight, for this months charges I thought yes lets go for it.

 

I have summarised my charges from 1 July 2002 (where internet banking starts) and I have been charged over £ 2,600 in that time, plus overdraft interest.

 

I have now prepared a schedule of these charges.

 

When I received notification about this months charges, I wrote to them to see if there was anything they were prepared to do for me. I mentioned that there are firms who will take your claim on a no win no fee basis and go back 6 years. Today I received a letter saying sorry that I was unhappy, blah blah blah.

 

So with the templates now copied, the ink drying on my schedule of charges - Let battle commence, as I try to sleigh the black horse.

 

Before I send of the first letter (not bothering with the one to ask for details for the last 6 years - as I will be more than happy if I recover the charges from 1 July 2002) I have a couple of queries.

 

1. When I send the letter and schedule do I include interest, not the interest I have been charged but the additional interest the charges have incurred - so many days @ x%

 

2. Is it best to send the letter recorded delivery.

 

3. What is the best address to send my letters too.

 

Any help or encouragement would be very much appreciated.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the first letter asking for a full refund it states the amount I am claiming + interest.

 

Is this interest figure the one that is calculated as been accrued on the charges on a daily basis since they were charged to my account.

 

Please someone give me a shove to get this action started.

 

I look forward to hearing from you all

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are 2 instances of interest you can claim:

 

1.When you go overdrawn the bank will charge you interest, perfectly lawfully.

 

However, if part of your overdraft is made up of penalty fees, they are also charging you interest on these too and it is this interest which you are entitled to claim back, but it's tricky to separate out from the total interest figure.

 

Vampiress has a spreadsheet, (the advanced one), in the bank templates library, which attempts to calculate this

 

It's quite complex and unless your claim is large may not amount to that much, so for simplicity's sake, some people don't bother

 

This is the interest referred to in the preliminary and LBA letters.

 

2. Section 69 8% interest on your claim, but only when you submit a claim at court. Don't add this interest before moneyclaim

 

 

1. When I send the letter and schedule do I include interest, not the interest I have been charged but the additional interest the charges have incurred - so many days @ x% No, see above.

 

2. Is it best to send the letter recorded delivery. Only if you want peace of mind. 1st class is fine .If you go to the PO, you can get a free Certificate Of Postage.

3. What is the best address to send my letters too.

See sticky for contacts at the top of the Lloyd's forum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Michael

 

Thank you for that advice, the charges I have incurred are £ 2,650.

 

To be honest I do not have the time to try and calculate the interest as per the complex schedule, so I will leave it. - This will not jepodise my claim in any way will it.

 

I will ceck for the address as you mentioned and the letter will be sent first class tommorow.

 

I am getting quite excited now.

 

Cheers

 

ps I will keep you all up to date as things progress

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

LBA deadline is uo on Wednesday, 17 January.

 

Recieved a letter yesterday, sorry you are still unhappy, etc.

But as a goodwill gesture, as it would cost this if it goes any further they have offered me £750 (which will be in my account in the next few days).

 

I am not happy with this and want to go to the next stage and file with moneyclaim.

 

But do I

a) reject their offer and see if they will increase it (more time wasted)

 

b) keep the £750 and just go ahead and file my claim online, with £750 been received on account.

 

c) reject the £750 and continue with my claim in the full amount

 

Cheers

 

ps. the £750 would be more than welcome at this time of year

Link to post
Share on other sites

LBA deadline is uo on Wednesday, 17 January.

 

Recieved a letter yesterday, sorry you are still unhappy, etc.

But as a goodwill gesture, as it would cost this if it goes any further they have offered me £750 (which will be in my account in the next few days).

 

I am not happy with this and want to go to the next stage and file with moneyclaim.

 

But do I

a) reject their offer and see if they will increase it (more time wasted)

 

b) keep the £750 and just go ahead and file my claim online, with £750 been received on account.

 

c) reject the £750 and continue with my claim in the full amount

 

Cheers

 

ps. the £750 would be more than welcome at this time of year

 

Send the template letter for rejection of settlement. You accept the offer as part payment, they may well recind the offer. You will need to file your claim after the LBA deadline is up. If they do credit you with the cash ensure you claim interest on it upto the date they paid the money into your account.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejection-settlement-offer.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the template letter for rejection of settlement. You accept the offer as part payment, they may well recind the offer. You will need to file your claim after the LBA deadline is up. If they do credit you with the cash ensure you claim interest on it upto the date they paid the money into your account.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejection-settlement-offer.html

 

Thanks for that, do I need to amend that letter as it is not an offer of settlement, but a goodwill gesture.

 

This £750 goodwill gesture seems to be a new thing they are trying to get people to drop their cases before they really start.

 

I have read through other threads and this £750 goodwill approach seems to be raising different responses.

 

Cheers anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, do I need to amend that letter as it is not an offer of settlement, but a goodwill gesture.

 

This £750 goodwill gesture seems to be a new thing they are trying to get people to drop their cases before they really start.

 

I have read through other threads and this £750 goodwill approach seems to be raising different responses.

 

Cheers anyway

 

 

Its the same thing but yes amend the terminology.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're lucky I have total rejection all the way through this claim and have never had a offer made to me at all.

 

But still stick to what the mods and site helpers say and you will not go wrong.

Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I rejected thier goodwill offer, but the money has still benn credited to my account. So in my letter I have accepted it as a paymeny on account.

 

As the offer was made only a couple of days before the LBA deadline expired, as a goodwill gesture I gave them a further 7 days to settle in full.

 

The new deadline is at the end of this week, so I am now amending my schedule to incorporate the payment received on account and also to add the additional charges incurred since I started my action. I assume you are allowed to do this.

 

I will keep you posted of any developments

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am now amending my schedule to incorporate the payment received on account and also to add the additional charges incurred since I started my action. I assume you are allowed to do this.

 

Can anyone confirm this, also what happens to charges incurred during the court process can these be reclaimed at any time.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...