Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6231 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

AQ is Allocation Questionaire. YB might be disputing the charges because your schedule of charges doesn't add up to the figure they have, I know this happened with caro's case and she asked them for a breakdown of what they had for the charges. It might be a good idea for you to read through her thread which is now in the 'Successes' section. It might enlighten you to what to do or what will happen next.

 

Sarah.

Yorkshire Bank

Started Process 19th Sept 2006.

All Stages Followed.

Next Step Court!

Hearing Date 7th June 2007.

WON!!!!! 6th June 2007 :D

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Example Step-By-Step Instructions

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

zebby dog what is a AQ? Sorry im new to all this. I've check the MCOL website and it says that YB have disputed the chages. Will I recieve a letter to go to court? And Im sorry for stressing; but what are the chances that they will turn up at court??

TA

 

The AQ is basically a court form you fill in and send off.This helps to decide at which court your case is to be heard and which track ( small claims,fast track etc and the time it will take to be dealt with in court) There is a template in the library on how to fill this in.As for them turning up in court, its not likely.They havent done yet,but be prepared for them to take it to the wire and dont be put off by any of their threats it is all bull and bluster.

 

 

 

 

If I have helped please click the scales bottom right:wink:

;) If this helps please click the scales bottom left
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just recieved a response from Kirstie Ross who is the YB solicitor. And she has signed the defence saying that I have operated by bank in such a way which has incurred the charges.. blah blah

Is this standard procedure, It just seems so official..

Does anyone know what I need to expect next or where on this site I can look..

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zebby dog; this AQ form, is this something that I should be completing now..?

I haven't recieved a court date yet, just un sure of the stages...

 

 

No you just have to wait for the court to send it to you.this will happen when their 28 days to settle or defend expire.It will have a date on it by which you MUST return it to the court, make sure you send it back promptly;)

;) If this helps please click the scales bottom left
Link to post
Share on other sites

Any more news Martin?

 

 

Sorry Westwell.. I didnt see ur reply.. Just received my AQ.

Im unsure about what info will help to complete the form accurately.

Also im thinking of going on a short trip and wondered whether it is possible to postponed the AQ for a month. I see on the form that there is a ticky box to delay it for a month.

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look in bank templates library for allocation questionnaires a guide to completion here's a link

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

 

you can't delay the AQ there's a return date on it which you must comply with, the tick box you mention is to apply for a months stay to try and settle so it only delays the hearing date

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look in bank templates library for allocation questionnaires a guide to completion here's a link

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

 

you can't delay the AQ there's a return date on it which you must comply with, the tick box you mention is to apply for a months stay to try and settle so it only delays the hearing date

 

Im completing the AQ now, it is asking about witnesses. Can I call my girlfriend as a witness to my financial situation? What have most people done?

Also can i put that im on holiday for 2 weeks with regards to the hearing dates?

Link to post
Share on other sites

also the form has a section G.. other information.

Do i need to write anything in this box.. sorry everyone im clueless..

 

I am respectfully requesting that my claim be allocated to the small claims track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument.

 

Also say you expect the case to last no longer than 1 hour

;) If this helps please click the scales bottom left
Link to post
Share on other sites

Zebby not sure what to write in the G section further information. Do you have any ideas. Also from reading Caro's thread i was wondering how I go about claiming interest to todays date, rather than to the date that I have calculated in my last schedule of charges.

Not sure if I have spoken / written gobbledeegook,,,:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

its getting nerve wracking now... thanks Zebby i have completed section G now with ur help. I have another question being that my claim is just over £1,500 i have to pay a £100 fee to the courts. Can I attach a chque to the form, and who do I make the cheque payable to?

Thanku in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I attach a chque to the form
,Yes
and who do I make the cheque payable to?

HMCS (Her Majesty's Court Service)

 

 

Section G:

The Claimant proposes the attached draft order for directions, for the courts due consideration. If ordered, the Claimant believes these directions will allow the overriding objective's to be furthered in that they will fully identify the most fundemental issues in dispute (as detailed below), and allow them to be assessed so that this claim may proceed justly and expediously.

- The crux upon which this claim rests is the true cost incurred by the Defendent as a result of the contractual breach from which its charges arise. If the Defendent cannot substantiate the cost of each charge as proportionate to its loss incurred, it has charged contractual penalties contrary to the UTCCR 1999 and common law principles establised since the early 1900's.

- In the event that the Defendents charges were accepted as being a fee for a service (which is denied), examination of its true costs is required to determine whether the price is reasonable as required by the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.

As the law relating to contractual penalties is long established, the Claimant believes the outstanding issues to be of fact. Accordingly, the Claimant respectfully requests that the claim be allocated to the small claims track, and estimates that the hearing of the claim should last no longer than one hour.

 

 

And then attach a copy of the Draft Order. You don't have to do this if you don't want to.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Michael i have already written on the form;

'I am respectfully requesting that my claim be allocated to the small claims track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument.I expect the case to last no longer than 1 hour.'

 

Do I add your paragraphs to to the form.. what is the draft order? is that something I have to complete?

Im sorry, I have no idea...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I add your paragraphs to to the form..

All but the last para, which repeats itself.

 

what is the draft order?

Read post#3 here;

New strategy for Allocation Questionaires

 

 

is that something I have to complete?

You don't have to comply with it until the judge agrees to issue it as a Direction Order. He might not.
Link to post
Share on other sites

And there is a template; draft order, which i think that I should complete and attach to the AQ questionnaire
.

You don't 'complete' it just attach a copy of the order to the AQ

And also submit your info on a separate sheet with the form..

If you mean the info the Draft Order requires you to do, then no, not until the judege agrees to it and orders you to submit the info.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...