Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Obviously the real proof will come when the contract is revealed. In the meantime you could write to the DVLA asking who applied for your data back in 2017. And show them the signage where both companies are listed and ask in view of who asked for your details, did the right one apply and what is their view on both companies showing on the sign. Is this legal and explain that you are in the middle of a Court case and they may be called.
    • dear simple simon. with ref claim xxxxxx on xxxx date you sent me proof of the signs at the time of you issuing the parking charge notices listed in your particulars of claim of the above court claim    these signs are not in the name of the claimant stated on the claimform ref above....   should you wish to continue with the said claim , i give notice this file will form part of my evidence should you wish to proceed and waste court time.   just musing
    • Applications for Summary Judgment are not awarded on who did or didn't do what......they cant get a default judgment on either as you have submitted a defence...they could get Summary Judgment.   Summary judgment is only awarded in the follow circumstances...   ·        A claim or issue or a defence to a claim or issue has no real prospect of success and ·        There is no other compelling reason for a trial. (CPR 24.2)   Summary judgment a Quick guide.docx
    • What I’ve read elsewhere (and from being in touch with someone who has won using the above argument - but who also notes that others have lost using the same argument- it seems to be dependent upon the court/judge) is that it is possible to win BUT I’m not entirely certain if it holds actual legal weight.    @dx100uk write a letter you say? To DBL or VCS?   something like this??;   I am writing in respect to the above noted County Court Claim issued by your legal team in connection to three separate Parking Charge Notices (PCNs) issued to vehicle registration mark XXXXXX. I was the named keeper of the vehicle at the time of the PCN issue but do not claim liability.   I wish you to note the following; whilst you may ‘think’ that you have adequate grounds to make this claim, the simple facts are that you have absolutely no right (in law??) and the evidence I have uncovered as a direct result of your claim, along with the evidence and wording contained in the communications you sent to me (dated XX August 2017) irrefutably show that you (Vehicle Control Services) have absolutely no claim in law.   Please be aware that should continue to pursue this claim not only will you incur your own costs but also costs that I will be claiming against you for bringing this unfounded and malicious claim which bears no legal weight whatsoever and is in breach of the IPC Code of Conduct (Versions 5 and 6).  Subsequently, I will be reporting you to the ICO for improper use of KADOE and to the IPC for breach of the Code of Conduct.   Yours faithfully,     Scans coming later.... 
    • Always looking for plan b -    the defence is short and poor and not laid out in the correct format - because I didn’t do it    but the points are the same just brief ,    would they have tried for summary judgement if I laid out a bigger defence - yes , they already put on allocation they would apply for one ☝️ n both claims -    they didn’t on claim one as I had a long defence , they did on claim 2 as defence small So did what they said they would do  -    they effectively want my defence struck out , to get a judgement by default , as there chances of winning in court are slim    maybe I include photocopy of that form and say they always were going to apply for this, they did not get to this point by my poor defence , I don’t have to bear their costs 
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Tax credit fraud- compliance interview


Recommended Posts

Still not heard anything, the woman I spoke to with the interview was lovely.

She just said it’s more than likely il just have to pay the amount back.

Fingers crossed that’s all it is. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I've replied now but please bear in mind that we're all volunteers here so people get here when they can. Also, weekends are quieter here but we do what we can.   HB

Sorry, thank you!!  

A solicitor would be the last person you want for this. It's not an interview under caution, the worst that will happen is that they will take around 8% of your future award, going forward. That's it!

This is the letter 

 

“Provisional tax credits statement for 06/04/2019 to 06/04/2019

it says for that period child tax - £24.29

then it says 

thank you for telling us about your recent change of circumstances. This change means that tax credits were not due after 06/04/2019 and we have to review the amount of tax credits paid to you for the period 06/04/2019 to 06/04/2019.

please complete and sign and return the tax credits declaration form we sent you by 32/07/2020.
 

 
Amount to be paid 
£24.29
payments already made to you  £8001.48
Amount of overpayment from earlier years £888.66

Amount due from you 
£8865.85 

Upto April 2019

from this award period £8865.85
of this £888.66 already been collected 
£3330.54 already been collected back from later awards

£8865.85 still to be confirmed as overpaid.


it doesn’t make sense to me.
What are the dates about and why are they both the same?
I’m guessing I will receive more letters about the other dates? 
Link to post
Share on other sites

scan the letter to PDF

read upload carefully 

we need to see all of it please

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you not follow what i posted please

one multipage PDF only 

don't use file hosting sites they are full of virus.

 

and please stop hitting QUOTE

just type

it makes a thread twice as large as what it need to do 

just type

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you two are simply the blind leading the blind and each stressing each other out unnecessarily ..:bounce:

you can use photos in a PDF use the sites listed pdf merge and pdf shrink 

if you cant do i'll do it for you later.

 

they are not interested in other years else they'd have asked already

10'000 get exactly the same letters everyday

all you'll be asked to do is pay a reasonable small sum from benefits going forward thats all.

 

there are numeous threads here already of people that stressed for nothing with proof of outcome

 

one even said they'd spent more time unnecessarily stressing about everything that they knew from day one it was wrong but stressed about doing nothing rather than doing something then...:crazy:

 

why not just get on with life and not stress ...stress is no excuse i said.. they laughed and said yea that's me..i spend all day on facebook looking for things to stress out about even if i don't have any of my own issues to do it over......:noidea:

 

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...