Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • MPs are pushing authorities to respond to allegations of potential fraud at certain banks, whereby it’s claimed home repossession documents weren’t actually signed by the authorised signatory View the full article
    • Thanks Dx. Amended defence set out below. Does it look right now?   1. By agreement between the defendant and Halifax on or around the 3/3/2015 (the agreement) Halifax agreed to loan the defendant monies.     2.The defendant did not pay instalments as they fell due.     3.The agreement was terminated following a service of a default notice.     4.The agreement was assigned to the claimant.     5.The claimant therefore claims 1. 4.5k 2. Costs    Defence   1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.     2. The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017. It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.     3. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is accepted that I have had financial dealings with Halifax in the past. However I do not recall entering into any financial agreement with Halifax on or around 03/03/2015 and have sought verification from the claimant who has not complied with my request for further information.     4. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am not aware of any payment terms for the stated agreement.     5. Paragraph 3 is denied. It is denied that Cabot Financial served any Default notice on the Defendant pursuant to s87 Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Claimant is required to prove that a compliant Default Notice was served upon the Defendant. The Claimant is required to prove that the any Default notice relied upon complied with the requirements of s88(4A) Consumer Credit Act 1974 and that the notice was in the prescribed form as required by The Consumer Credit Enforcement Default and Termination Notice Regulations 1983.   6. Paragraph 4 is denied as I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served by either the claimant or the original creditor.     7. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant; the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of credit agreement / assignment / balance / breach requested by CPR 31.14, and remains in default of my section 77 request, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:   a. Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and   b. Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and   c. Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim     8. On receipt of this claim I requested by way of Royal Mail on 13/10/20 a CPR 31.14 request from the claimant’s solicitors and a section 77 requests to the Claimant, for copies of the documents referred to within the Claimant’s particulars to establish what the claim is for. To date the Claimant has failed to comply with my section 77 request and their solicitors, Mortimer Clarke, have refused my CPR 31.14 request.     9. As per Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.     10. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82 A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974     11. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.  
    • I'm generally convinced that there is at least 2 users on MSE that's in my thread that has friends or family or even themselves that have similar line of work to MB or Gladstone.   I don't mind different opinions but they're just throwing out playground insults to me for using that letter saying I'm stupid, prat, idiot etc etc for doing it and not including in the letter without prejudice so it can't be used against me in court. I think I'll leave MSE and just stick with CAG and pep in this case.    
    • Fraudsters are using the details of firms we authorise to try to convince people that they work for a genuine, authorised firm. Find out more about this ‘clone firm’. View the full article
    • not sure what happened to the statint sheet...looks like you over wrote cells.   so they have already litigated over this debt ?
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Refund for Cancelled Ticket

Recommended Posts

I purchased a return ticket from LCA to LON in October 2019, the return date to LCA was set as June 2020. 

However Lufthansa cancelled the flight due to the pandemic. 


They did not allow me to partake in the voucher programme however they did issue me with correspondence stating they cancelled the flight and that I would be refunded.


Needless to say that I was not, so I complained and complained and was ignored.

I passed the matter to SOP the German arbitration agency that I was informed I had to complain through. 

SOP wrote back to me informing me that Lufthansa had agreed without claim that they would refund the ticket half that was unused some €265. 


I received a token refund of the taxes by Lufthansa but not the price of the ticket subsequently I have been ignored by SOP and Lufthansa. 

I then filed a chargeback/dispute with AMEX who took over a month and stated that Lufthansa's terms and conditions meant that they did not have to refund the ticket.  


However the airline cancelled the ticket.


I am somewhat at a loss how to proceed at this point, I was very surprised with the response from Amex over the dispute (although I haven't received the letter yet).  I have formally complained to Amex this evening.  


How do I enforce the arbitration award?  Can I continue to complain against Amex and ultimately the Ombudsman? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi yellowplum, a few questions here


  • When was your cancellation notified to you, under or over 2 weeks before the flight? If under you can claim for EC261 comp, but it will likely be over because LH know what they are doing.
  • Did they not offer any alternative flights? Only a flat out refund? Might help if you paste the correspondence you received from LH.
  • How much did you pay in total and how much was offered back?



Link to post
Share on other sites

Lufthansa originally offered everyone a voucher and the ability to rebook any flight anywhere pay the difference no fees to change anything.  When I phoned to do this they told me that I had used half the ticket and they didn't know what to do.  I was told that I couldn't change the ticket only stick to the same location. 


I was offered the choice of a full refund at the time or change the ticket. I opted for neither and left it.  It was only then that Lufthansa then subsequently emailed to state the flight had been cancelled and offered a refund. 


I've uploaded the ticket original confirmation and the cancellation email I received.   The original ticket was €749.56 and I was offered the half that was unused which they calculated to be €265.54.



Gmail - Booking details _ Departure_ 09 November 2019 _ LCA-LHR.pdf Gmail - Cancellation Confirmation.pdf Gmail - Conciliation procedure F 133136_20.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, well you are lucky. They cancelled your flight on the 25th May and your flight was on the 3rd of June, this means that you are covered by EC261 as your flight was cancelled with less than 2 weeks notice.


Your flights is 2020 miles so it qualifies for medium haul flight. Therefore Lufhtanse owes you 800 EUROS!



You will need to claim compensation directly from Lufthansa citing the articles that they are violating. Your claim will then be bulletproof:


I'm highliting the relevant bits in RED.


Article 5


1. In case of cancellation of a flight, the passengers concerned shall:

(a) be offered assistance by the operating air carrier in accordance with Article 8; and

(b) be offered assistance by the operating air carrier in accordance with Article 9(1)(a) and 9(2), as well as, in event of re-routing when the reasonably expected time of departure of the new flight is at least the day after the departure as it was planned for the cancelled flight, the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c); and

(c) have the right to compensation by the operating air carrier in accordance with Article 7, unless:

(i) they are informed of the cancellation at least two weeks before the scheduled time of departure; or

(ii) they are informed of the cancellation between two weeks and seven days before the scheduled time of departure and are offered re-routing, allowing them to depart no more than two hours before the scheduled time of departure and to reach their final destination less than four hours after the scheduled time of arrival; or   [Kyosanto: From your email it looks like you were NOT offered re-routing, thus the airline violated article 5.1.c.ii]

(iii) they are informed of the cancellation less than seven days before the scheduled time of departure and are offered re-routing, allowing them to depart no more than one hour before the scheduled time of departure and to reach their final destination less than two hours after the scheduled time of arrival.

2. When passengers are informed of the cancellation, an explanation shall be given concerning possible alternative transport.

3. An operating air carrier shall not be obliged to pay compensation in accordance with Article 7, if it can prove that the cancellation is caused by extraordinary circumstances which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken. [Kyosanto: LH might try and pull this card BUT DO NOT LET THEM, as the corona pandemic was known WELL PRIOR to June 2020 and they had ample time to provide you with alternatives, which they did not] 

4. The burden of proof concerning the questions as to whether and when the passenger has been informed of the cancellation of the flight shall rest with the operating air carrier.



Article 7

Right to compensation

1. Where reference is made to this Article, passengers shall receive compensation amounting to:

(a) EUR 250 for all flights of 1500 kilometres or less;

(b) EUR 400 for all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres, and for all other flights between 1500 and 3500 kilometres;

(c) EUR 600 for all flights not falling under (a) or (b).

In determining the distance, the basis shall be the last destination at which the denial of boarding or cancellation will delay the passenger's arrival after the scheduled time.

2. When passengers are offered re-routing to their final destination on an alternative flight pursuant to Article 8, the arrival time of which does not exceed the scheduled arrival time of the flight originally booked

(a) by two hours, in respect of all flights of 1500 kilometres or less; or

(b) by three hours, in respect of all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres and for all other flights between 1500 and 3500 kilometres; or

(c) by four hours, in respect of all flights not falling under (a) or (b),

the operating air carrier may reduce the compensation provided for in paragraph 1 by 50 %.

3. The compensation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be paid in cash, by electronic bank transfer, bank orders or bank cheques or, with the signed agreement of the passenger, in travel vouchers and/or other services.

4. The distances given in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be measured by the great circle route method.  [Use my link above]


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick reply, for clarity I presume this is including and regardless of the refund to the portion of my ticket that I attempted to claim from them, it is either or scenario.


Also do I have to go back to SOP to claim against Lufthansa?  What do you suggest is the best course of action to take now that SOP have decreed that Lufthansa should refund me and I tried to claim from Amex but they didn't uphold the charge back for the ticket?


Does Covid not impact on them giving out compensation also?

Edited by yellowplum
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, this is an EC261 claim, so you go to the airline directly and you have to state that in according to article 5 and 7 you are claiming for 400 euros per passengers. No need to go through anyone else. This won't be Amex because it's not a refund on your unused ticket, it's a compensation that you are due from the airline.


However I believe you MIGHT be entitled to both the 253 euro refund AND the 800 euro compensation. Those are 2 separate processes from each other so I would pursue each of them separately. You can tell Lufthansa that you accept the refund but also are making an EC261 claim for the cancellation.


Regarding the refund itself I believe that the 253 euro calculation from LH is actually correct. Your away flight is in booking class H, which is a high paying tier of economy. Where as your return is in class K which is deep discount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I will give it a go with Lufthansa on what you suggest.  Just one question here, if they don't response/decline what is the course of action to further the complaint and claim for the compensation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help. I'll put in a claim against them, see what happens as you suggest I doubt it will be a walk in the park. It is just another avenue, to be honest their entire attitude has been not to engage - lets see what happens - happily come back and provide updates.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...