Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CEL MNPR PCN Claimform - CAR PARK AT 2 LINTON ROAD, BARKING , IG11 8HG due on Wednesday :(


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1271 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello , I hope you can help please,

 

My partner drove my car to meet some clients at a pub,

as there was no parking, he decided to park elsewhere,

unfortunately this happened to be a private land,

 

We received a PCN details below, but He (Partner ) decided to ignore as he only stayed for 18 mins ,

to be honest we can't remember if there was a photo evidence or ticket.

Claim amount is now £261.25 , PLEASE HELP .... :( 

 

 

For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture]

(must be received within 14 days from the Incident)

 

please answer the following questions.

 

1 Date of the infringement Give answer here : 18/06/2019  18:46:02   TO 18/06/2019 19:04:29
 

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Give answer here : 21/06/2019
 

[scan up BOTHSIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide

 

3 Date received Give answer here : So sorry ..  Can't remember
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Give answer here: Mentioned on the back page under APPEALS
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Give answer here : I haven't got any PHOTO, not sure if they sent it, I logged on there site to check but i see is the balance to pay
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Give answer here : I haven't responded to them at all , It's been ignored 
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here
 

7 Who is the parking company? Give answer here : CIVIL ENFORCEMENT LTD

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Give answer here : CAR PARK AT 2 LINTON ROAD, BARKING , IG11 8HG
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Give answer here : POPLA (Parking on private land appeals )
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

please complete post 1 in the above

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to CEL ANPR PCN Claimform - CAR PARK AT 2 LINTON ROAD, BARKING , IG11 8HG due on Wednesday :(

Name of the Claimant : CIVIL ENFORCEMENT LTD

 

Claimants Solicitors: Says .signed by S. Wilson Head of Legal (Claimant's Legal Representative )

 

Date of issue – 28 Aug 2020

 

Date for AOS -  think this is 15/09/2020  but i havent done anything yet ! ..

 

Date to submit Defence -   : 29/09/2020

 

What is the claim for – 

 

1.Claim for monies relating to a parking charge for parking in a private car park managed by the Claimant in breach of the terms + conditions (T + Cs ).

 

2.Drivers are allowed to park in accordance with the T + Cs of use.

ANPR Cameras and /or manual patrols are used to monitor vehicles entering + exiting the site.

 

Debt + Damages claimed the sum of 170.00 .

Violation date 18/06/2019. Time in: 18:46 , Time out : 19:04,

PCN REF : XXXXXXX , Car reg : XXXXXX, Car park : Dreams Hotel.

 

Total due - 170.00 

 

The claimant claims the sum of 186.25 for monies relating to a parking charge per the above

including 16.25 interest pursuant to S.69 of the county courts Act 1984 Rate 8.00% pa from dates above to 27/08/20 same rate to judgement or (sooner ) payment daily rate to judgement -0.04

 

Total debt and interest due 186.25

+court fee £25

+legal rep £50

 

What is the value of the claim? £261.25

 

PCN AND LETTER OF KEEPER LIABILITY.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to CEL MNPR PCN Claimform - CAR PARK AT 2 LINTON ROAD, BARKING , IG11 8HG due on Wednesday :(

thread tidied.

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked.
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.

 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aww you are an ANGEL !! Thank you so much !!

 

I have visited the MCOL website but it is presently down .. I am getting this notification 

Sorry, the service is unavailable

We're busy releasing updates. Please try again later.

If you need contact details, go to GOV.UK and enter the name of the service.

 

I have had a look CPR 31:14 request , Can i just ask , what if they have the photos @ agreements ? will i lose the case and get a CCJ ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i will guess as there is no in/out photos that this is a local guy that is either employed by CEL or is a local that gets a backhander for taking photos and dubbing people in that supposedly have parked on private land and broken some imaginary contract by entering the land

 

cel are one of the worst PPC for making fatal mistakes that blow themselves out the water.

one of the common ones has already revealed themselves on your claimform..they are not using a solicitor, but some bloke in the office one desk closer to the bog that wears a different colour skirt to the rest.

ther will be other mistake we will spot.

 

now you questions 

you are obviously very green.

you need to get yourself upto speed

 

get reading:

https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:3134625398&q=CEL &oq=CEL &gs_l=partner-generic.12...28286.28286.1.29895.1.1.0.0.0.0.58.58.1.1.0.csems%2Cnrl%3D13...0.0jj1...1.34.partner-generic..14.1.66.TuZ12NDect8

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep trying MCOL, you have to do Acnowledgement of Service, by today 4pm  otherwise might end up default CCJ. DX or another team member will clarify.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

MCOL is only one way of responding to a claim. 
(AOS, DEFENCE, N180 ETC)
.
If you are having problems logging in, or would prefer not to use MCOL
you can fax, email or post your response to the Court instead. 

If you send your response by e mail 
please send it to [email protected] and ensure you quote “Claim number xxx xxx response” and quote the claim number in the subject field. 
.
 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To answer your question

 

1] I cannot recall where any of the paking companies have managed to get all their ducks in a row especially all the regulations they need to be able to produce a contract between them and the motorist. The most likely one they fall down on is not having planning permission for their signage from the local Council Town and Country [Advertisements] Regulations 2007.

 

2] even if they do take you to Court and you lose [pretty unlikely when defended and highly unlikely when strongly defended] you have 30 days to pay the charge decided by the  Court and that squashes the CCJ and nothing appears on your credit record.

 

It is important to get the CPR 31.14 off to CEL quickly so that if they bother to reply you can use them when you come to write your Witness Statement. If they don't bother, you can then say in your WS that you believe they do not have the necessary permissions to offer the motorist a contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much all , I am so  happy and appreciate your immediate support as i thought we had left it tooo late to the last minute !

 

Also thanks for keeping my worries at peace .. lol

 

Managed to log on to MCOL , and filled out as advised, it was also submitted before 4pm  ,  next is the CPR 31.14 , Will surely keep you abreast ..

Link to post
Share on other sites

do not miss your defence filing date no matter what

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Good day all, 

I filled my defence to the court after sending the CPR31.14 Request to the claimant.

 

The court responded early last week with a Notice of Proposed Allocation to the Small Claims Track, which they consider the case suitabley

 

. I was then advised to complete box C1 should i not deem the case fit for the Small Claim questionnaire (Form N180) and return to the court and the other party by 2nd of Nov,2020

 

Also, a letter came from the claimant towards the end of last week titled:

1)Right of access request relating to PCN.............  

2) Old PCN notices

3) Letter before Action- Claim for Debt

4) How to pay

5) Information sheet

6) Reply form- 30 days grace to return filled form

7)Press summery- reference to old cases won

8)Claim form- Reference only

 

No reference was made whatsoever regarding the CPR31.14 request. 

 

Your views, opinions and advise will be much appreciated as usual.

 

Thank you all! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What defence did you file?

And have you returned the n180 yet?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all responses.

 

My Defence:

 

''1)The Claimant has failed to show, upon request under CPR 31.14, any authority or agency to enter into contracts with the public by way of an assignment from the proprietor to do the same and to make civil claims in their own name.

 

The defendant does not believe that the claimant has locus standi in this matter as they have failed to produce a contract between themselves and the landowner that assigns the right to enter into contracts with the public and to make civil claims in their own name.


2)In any case no contract exists between the claimant and the defendant due to the paucity of the signage at the site that offers the supposed contract.''

 

Please note that have until 2nd of November,2020  to agree to the small claim and notify the court and the claimant as i'm yet to return the N180

 

Should i agree to the small claims track as i have limited time to respond...... Please advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done 

n180

use this 

far more professional than copying

three copies 

 

1 to the court

1 to their solicitors

1 for your file

 

no to mediation

1 witness you

yes to small claim

 

the rest is obv

 

do NOT include your phone/sig nor email on the fleecers copy

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you not been reading up here since you came here...

cag is self help too!!

 

it's imperative you understand what to do as the claim progresses and what's to come and how to react.

 

100's of like threads here 

 

use our search top right 

 

PCN claimform 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 15/09/2020 at 02:34, dx100uk said:

i will guess as there is no in/out photos that this is a local guy that is either employed by CEL or is a local that gets a backhander for taking photos and dubbing people in that supposedly have parked on private land and broken some imaginary contract by entering the land

 

cel are one of the worst PPC for making fatal mistakes that blow themselves out the water.

one of the common ones has already revealed themselves on your claimform..they are not using a solicitor, but some bloke in the office one desk closer to the bog that wears a different colour skirt to the rest.

ther will be other mistake we will spot.

 

now you questions 

you are obviously very green.

you need to get yourself upto speed

 

get reading:

https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:3134625398&q=CEL &oq=CEL &gs_l=partner-generic.12...28286.28286.1.29895.1.1.0.0.0.0.58.58.1.1.0.csems%2Cnrl%3D13...0.0jj1...1.34.partner-generic..14.1.66.TuZ12NDect8

 

 

you've been here +7 weeks and i can't see you've read one other relevant thread after my post above on 15th sept

use the link above get reading and get yourself upto speed .

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I would like to thank you all for your help so far on this matter. I have been reading some relevant thread on here as rightly suggested to get myself up to speed.

 

One thing is certainly clear, and that is NO to mediation. I have got to put the form N180 in the post first class tomorrow money to meet Monday's deadline.

I haven't really found a clear answer to one or two things:

1) Can i change the hearing venue to my preferred county court?

2) What's my reason for considering the case not suitable for the small claims tack and what alternative?

 

I'm really sorry to be a nuisance but this has got to be posted tomorrow morning and i'm running out of time.

 

I am really counting on your advise please

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 28/10/2020 at 00:04, dx100uk said:

well done 

n180

use this 

far more professional than copying

three copies 

 

1 to the court

1 to their solicitors

1 for your file

 

no to mediation

1 witness you

yes to small claim

 

the rest is obv

 

do NOT include your phone/sig nor email on the fleecers copy

 

 

i'll repeat my post of earlier as some of your last post answers are wrong...

 

1 in your post ---you put down YOUR local court - as you are the defendant it is always moved to the court you put there

2. in your post above...as i said above YES to small claims track. 

 

print out 3 blank N180's ----fill them in

 

do NOT include your phone/sig nor email on the fleecers copy

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...