Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
    • Send them a letter of claim straightaway. No point hanging around. Given 14 days in the letter of claim and if they haven't paid you by then, issue the claim on day 15. The amount of time is more than adequate for them to get going. Post your draft letter of claim here. A look at. Then log onto the MoneyClaim website and start preparing your claim and post your particulars of claim here for us to have a look at. Don't bluff. No point in it.
    • That's what we thought, but the store manager is inferring that, as the jeweller we used was not a member of the NJA, no one  would give what he said, any credence. The Jeweller we used is in fact, a long established, well respected company, with 2 store and rather than just being a retailer, they craft the most exquisite jewellery inhouse!  I wish my Fiancé would have bought from them rather than H Samuel! Do you think we do need to get another report from and NJA accredited Jeweller ?
    • Really pleased that you won. UKPC know that you have supremacy of contract but still they persist because so many motorists blindly pay them.   Muppets.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with Fast Track claim process please


oris
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1281 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Might be helpful to decipher the defence out here - the handwriting is unclear and English doesn’t appear to be the first language of the person who wrote it:

 

”In respect of the above claim I totally ????? any claim & allogation [sic] brought against myself for funds that have been invested jointly with myself & full receipt by solicitors and investment house have been given.

 

Full disclosure & discreption [sic] & defence has been given by Mr XXXXX on the Claimant’s responce [sic].

 

I do not agre [sic] & advice [sic] that I personally never under ??????? these funds other than intended for.

 

I also do not personally the harassment of my personal responce [sic] at night for (several illegible words) and log this action by the Claimant under crime log XXXXX.

 

Further to the aligations [sic] & Claimant claim on 11/08/2020 ref XXXXX can confirm that no encouragement was given this option to ingest was discussed with no pressure as all was 100% Claimant’s choice. All invested monies have been receipted by legal solicitor & investment co dealing with the investment. Since Claimant requested funds back all updates have been provided to the Claimant with this return. No response received from the Claimant to a recorded delivery letter sent 16/07/2020 with letter dated 15/07/2020.

 

Also due to investment & verbal (altercation?) as why my residential ????? on 18/06/2020 ???? police were called & (several illegible words).

 

No funds have or were taken from the Claimant by any false means or use other than that ????? & soley [sic] for the Claimant’s investment purposes, bearing in mind members of my own family also have their own personal monies invested into this investment themselves. 
 

Never have I ????? or advised the Claimant shall not get his investment monies returned to himself, but as I do not handle the transaction I can only be advised by those parties that received the Claimant’s monies and dealings with his returns.”

 

In summary, not me guv (I’m just the middle man).

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  

Looking at the document  word for word as I try to break it down  (10&11)

In respect  of the above claim no XXXX

 

I totally dispute this claim and allegation brought against myself for funds that have been invested jointly with myself and full receipt by solicitors and investment house have been given

 

Full disclosure and description and defence has been given by Mr xxxxxx on the  claimants response.

 

I do not agree and advise that i personally never used or transferred these funds other than intended for.

 

I also do not personally take harassment at my personal residence late at night for which I had no alternative to call the police and log this action by the claimant under claim log xxxx

 

(12 & 13 )

Further to the allegations &the claimants claim on date xxx ref xxxx I can confirm that no encouragement was given this option to invest was discussed with no pressure at all was 100%claimants choice

 

all invested monies have been receipted  by legal solicitors and investment co. dealing with the investment.

 

since claimant requested funds back all updates have been provided to the claimant with this return.

no response received from the claimant to a recorded delivered letter sent xxxxx with letter dated xxxx

also due to a verbal altercation at my residential property on date xxxx the police was called and claim no xxxx was set up for our (myself and my xxxxxx) protection

 

no funds have or were taken from the claimant by any false means or use other than that purely and soley for the claimants investment purposes , bearing in mind members of mown family also have their own personal monies invested into the investment themselves.

 

Never have I disputed or advised the claimant shall not get his investment monies returned to himself , but as I  do not handle the transactions I can only be advised by those parties that received the claimant monies and dealings with his return    

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The order states the 3 options available.....if you cant agree settlement then you submit a further DQ.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same if nothing changed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...