Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim against me but was not driving


Gustacus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1319 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i am in a very complicated situation right now.

 

On the 3rd of September I sold my car to a friend same day he got it taxed and "insured".

 

Next day he gets into an accident unfortunately bumping into the back of somebody due to a very sudden stop and not being able to brake in time.

 

The  accident was claimed and today my insurance texts me saying a claim has been made now.

(Now I have been trying to get my insurance cancelled/suspended but its not been the easiest)

 

thats fine it will go under his insurance i just need to provide my insurance my friends policy number and insurance company.

 

today he told me he was not insured until the 5th of September a day after the accident that means that accident is not insured well this just got complicated.

 

I was on the phone to my insurance company with the mindset im fine and all I just need to provide details and my friend was going to admit to fault to clear my name.

 

he was driving uninsured at the time this claim is against me meaning the insurance can't go anywhere else.

 

My friend is more than willing to face the consequences of driving uninsured and get my name cleared.

 

if he admits to my insurance he was at fault with no insurance provided evidence of me not being in the car at the time as I was in the office as well as

 

evidence the car was not in my ownership through DVLA 

witnesses of the car accident

 

 will I still be able to get this claim off me - provided my friend admits to fault and faces consequences.

 

Would love advice on this as I have never ever been in a situation like this

Link to post
Share on other sites

simple fact is

- you were not the registered keeper at the time 

- you were not the driver at the time

 

.....nothing to do with you nor your insurance company.?

 

can't ever see why it would be.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you get your friend to write a letter to all parties – including the third party as well as your insurer making it clear that he was driving at the time and it was him who was responsible for the accident.

I expect that your insurer will be rather surprised because they are probably more used to people trying to claim that they were the driver in order to get the benefit of the insurance and this unusually is the other way round.

Get the letter off and let us know what happens. If they still cause problems then we can help you with a next step which may be an affidavit from your friend and also from you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, this is more complicated, as you still had a live Insurance policy for the car and according to the Motor Insurance Database, your Insurers were legally responsible for third party claims. Your Insurers are therefore unable to avoid dealing with the third parties claim.  legislation that covers this is Road Traffic Act. Link below.

 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/part/VI/crossheading/compulsory-insurance-or-security-against-thirdparty-risks/enacted

 

Your friend has made a potentially very expensive mistake, but would have little choice in dealing with this. It may not be just the damage to the car, as some people will go on to say they were injured e.g. whiplash.

 

How does this affect you ? A claim will be recorded against your Insurance even though you were not driving, due to the live Insurance. You will have to argue this with Insurers, showing evidence of how you tried to contact them to cancel the Insurance. It is possible that your Insurers may try to seek a recovery against you, if your friend does not pay them, as by not cancelling the policy, you have allowed your Insurers to still be liable, even though you no longer had control of the car.

 

The MIB (Motor Insurers Bureau) may be worth contacting to discuss this, as they deal with such issues on a regular basis. I would attach a link for MIB, but their website is not working. Their telephone number is 01908 830001

 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ethel Street said:

Have you now formally told your insurer that the policy is to be cancelled from 3rd September?

Answer both your questions. I have a slip from DVLA printed on the 3rd of September where they say their records have been updated and I am no longer in ownership of the car

 

And for the 2nd one im assumimg I cant cancel my insurance anyway as of now because I have this claim on me

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must put in writing to the insurer today confirming that the policy should be cancelled from 3rd September because you sold the vehicle on that date and no longer have any interest in it. Send them a copy of whatever evidence you have that the vehicle was sold. Also if they sent you a Certificate of Insurance by post when you last renewed the policy post it back to them. (Today because it's 7 days from the date you sold the vehicle and there's 7 day deadline for returning the certificate)

 

Don't wait for your friend to write a letter to insurers, you must take action immediately to write to your insurers. A letter from your friend, as suggested in post 3, would also be helpful. I'd ask the friend to give the letter to you so you can be certain your insurers get it and you know what it says.

 

There is no claim under your policy. Only you can make a claim under your policy and you aren't because at the time of the accident you didn't own the vehicle and weren't driving the vehicle. I do not agree with unclebulgaria that this will be recorded as a claim against your policy. The insurer may attempt to do that but they are not entitled to because it is not a claim under your policy. If your insurer has to pay the third party (and the law's not at all clear in cases like this where the vehicle had already been sold) it would be dealt with by what's known as a 'Section 151 claim'. That is not a claim under your policy.

 

This paragraph from a recent seminar on s151 claims is relevant to your situation, although unfortunately it only confirms that the law is unclear. 

 

image.png.1ba0c2e805f48a187506ade53523f193.png

 

https://www.2tg.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/2TG-Guidance-Note-Motor-Insurance-Law-for-Learners-JMD-5.5.2020.pdf

Edited by Ethel Street
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have definite proof of DVLA notification, then you may be Ok.  Follow the advice of Ethel Street, by making sure the Insurers confirm cancellation from 3//9/20.   Then it won't be a claim against your policy and the Insurers may then argue they were not at risk in regard to S.151of RTA.  

 

It will then be down to your friend to deal with the third party directly. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...