Announcements
-
-
Tweets
-
-
Posts
-
Thanks dx. While I understand that the CPR request must only refer to the Particulars of Claim, if the OP was challenged in the way you say could he not just whip out the previous letters he received where the accusations against him are very, very specific? Maybe the solution is to make the CPR request mirror the general PoC. Maybe ask for - which goods the claimant is referring to and which balance of the price the defendant retained for himself in PoC 1 Whilst the defendant was employed by the claimant the defendant sold goods belonging to the claimant receiving full price and purporting to account therefor but only accounting for part thereof and retaining the balance for his own benefit - a breakdown of how the figure of £526.95 was arrived at including the date, time and amount of each alleged selling of goods - copies of, or links to, any evidence in any form they possess of the alleged selling of goods. Apologies if I'm making a pig's ear out of this, I know very little about CPR especially in a complex case like this, and am thinking out loud. I think it would be a good idea if the OP would post a draft of what he proposes to send and we can then fine tune it. -
By AardvarkManipulator · Posted
Her name is Amanda Bell, she's having a drink with him on his Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/Guy.Alexander.Bell He got caught out a while back on a Google review from an "Amanda XXXXXXX" and that was her maiden name before she married him, he quickly edited that review. There's another load of reviews on YELL and I'd bet my house they're all fake, certainly the one from Amanda will be. -
I don't think it makes much odds now. The tactic of waiting for OPS' WS was so you could counter their lies in your own WS. But as you've sent your WS to the court that's it, the WS is finished. You might as well send yours to OPS now. If OPS mess you around by not providing their WS they are digging their own grave!
-
Good Afternoon guys! Name of the Claimant: National Car Parks Limited Claimants Solicitors: BW Legal Date of issue: 27th October 2020 Date for AOS: 5th November (AOS was completed on 10th November) Date to submit Defence: 29th November (This is a Sunday so: 27th November) What is the claim for: 1.The Claim is for the sum of £189 being the contractual charge due from the Defendant in respect of a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) for a contractual breach which occurred on 05/11/2018 in the private car park/land at Lincoln Brayford Street Lincoln LN5 7BJ in relation to a ******** registration mark *** ****. 2.The PCN was issued as the Defendant failed to comply with the terms and conditions, as displayed. 3.Despite demands, the charge remains unpaid. The Claim also includes Statutory Interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum (a daily rate of £O.04) from 05/11/2018 to 26/10/2020 being an amount of 29. The Claim also includes £60.00 recovery costs as set out in the Terms and Conditions and in the ATA AoS Code of Practice." What is the value of the claim? Amount Claimed: £189 Court Fees: £25 Legal Rep Fees: £50 Total Amount: £264 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A little more information from me: This alleged offense occurred two years ago and the vehicle in question was a hire car, hired by my small company. I'm genuinely unable to recall the event. I did drive that particular vehicle most of the time. I do not recall if I informed them I was driver at that point (I may have done to avoid damaging the company as these sorts of letters fall on my desk) or if the hire company informed them that I was the named driver. I realise that I've left it quite late to do my defence, I've been reading the forums and pondering what to put for some time. I feel like a defence of "I don't know" sounds ridiculous but I also would rather take my chances playing their game and potentially ending up in court. I cannot imagine they would want to get to that point for the expenses they will incur for £264 or less. Happy to be corrected on this if wrong? Any tips and advice is gratefully received? Thank you. -
By BankFodder · Posted
Do we know this for a fact please? How do we know? Have you any idea what her name is? Mind you it's dated 2013. Is this anything to do with Harvill Shaw?
-
-
Our picks
-
***Hermes and mediation hints ***
BankFodder posted a topic in Postal and Delivery Services,
Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003-
- 1 reply
Picked By
BankFodder, -
-
Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help
waz70 posted a topic in NatWest Bank,
Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786-
- 30 replies
Picked By
waz70, -
-
Hermes lost parcel. **WON**
murraynt posted a topic in Postal and Delivery Services,
Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/-
- 49 replies
-
-
@247homerescue broke glass oven door
Mazzh posted a topic in General Consumer Issues,
Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391-
- 49 replies
Picked By
Mazzh, -
-
CRS Chasing for payment after Photo Studio scam 2 years later
-
Recently Browsing 0 Caggers
No registered users viewing this page.
-
Have we helped you ...?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now