Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • From Dan Bloom on Twitter lst night.   'So in summary: Sept 21: SAGE calls for 2-3 week lockdown. PM refuses.   Oct 13: Keir Starmer calls for 2-3 week lockdown. Govt source brands him a “shameless opportunist”.   Oct 30: Government scientists say it’s now too late for a 2-3 week lockdown and it’ll have to be longer.'   And it's been announced to the Mail and the Times, not to Parliament. That's an odd way to run a country.
    • Thank you for the reply - I'm half expecting them to either drop the whole thing or to spring the "We had to tell the court that you don't want to pay so we're going to restart proceedings" idea given the language in the consent order that I signed with them. Going to read up and prepare to defend in case they fancy playing that game. It'd be nice if they would actually play by the rules for once...
    • Hi, I'm not sure if I'm asking this in the correct forum.   Ill try to be brief   - last October I contacted a h2b company that said I was eligible for up to £200 off every window and door. I agreed to a company to come and quote.   The quote was given, the windows and doors installed. The initial installation was incomplete however the people installing said for them to be paid for their part I needed to sign both a form that said what was left and that they had done their part. This form was actually an agreement to release the funds from the finance company. I disputed this.   Fensa came to inspect my property finding multiple errors (improper sealing) in addition to those I found (chipped and damaged beading, poor finish and damage to an internal door and blind). The company returned to fix the issues Fensa identified.    I compiled a very hefty report and sent to the window company complaints team with pictures showing the faults. They did apologise and have attempted to remedy some of the issue.   I asked for a price breakdown in December to check exactly what each item cost. This was done as I had agreed to have sills in addition to the windows and i received capping boards instead (i didnt need capping boards).   The price breakdown shows no indication of any saving made as promised by the h2b company. When i highlighted this to the window company they said what they had provided was all they were giving me. I complained again and was given an explanation stating that they gave me a different saving that was larger than would have been offered by the h2b company in the first place. This was not indicated to me at point of sale.   Being that it has been a year I am wondering if I should contact the financial ombudsman about this. I feel as though I have been miss old this product and the company has been dishonest and unhelpful.   Any advice would be great.
    • Hi everyone,    They started sending threats:   Wednesday:    We have been instructed to proceed formally on this claim in 7 days in respect of the balance due to Photo Studio Group unless discharged or an arrangement made. This will result in a formal Letter Before Claim and Court Proceedings.    Thursday :    It's not too late to stop legal action. Settle the £1182.89 due to Photo Studio Group.    Friday 8:23am :   The £1182.89 due to Photo Studio Group is overdue we are now instructed to proceed with a formal Letter Before Claim.    Friday 6:28pm:   We are now considering whether to issue Court proceedings to recover £1182.89 owed to Photo Studio Group.        
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

1st Central - are they breaking any data protection laws?


Recommended Posts

Hi all

Just want some opinion on this matter.

 

I've regrettable insured with 1st Central 3 months ago and on 2 separate occasions being asked for proof of details which I think they are over stepping their boundaries in terms of privacy. 

 

1st time round they requested usually stuff like DVLC check code, driving licence, NCB and V5 That was fair enough

 

the latest request for a bank statement showing the card I paid the policy with; I don't understand what influence that has to the policy. They also want proof of home address (council tax statement or utility statement) which I would think a scanned driving licence I give them 1st time round was sufficient. I really don't think they are using my data to valid my insurance policy anymore.

 

I'm generally cautious of my online presence. Nowhere in their policy do they mention data protection and how is my data stored/managed.

 

Frankly I don't really trust them as I know they use very aggressive cookies on their website to track IP addresses, device names etc. I've never been asked to submit proof of personal details to this level before by any insurance company; Is this the norm now how insurance company operate?

 

Another point is they given me 2 choices; either email it (not particularly safe) or post them which is at my cost every time I post to meet their constant request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi NK,

 

Just to give some balance to this, I've had 3 cases where fraudsters have tried to insure 3 different cars using my bank account. The charges went through on my bank account but were flagged up as suspicious and they asked me to confirm if I'd made the transactions.

 

They want to check it was really YOU that paid for the insurance with YOUR bank or credit card account, as well as proof of your address. 

 

Instead of being suspicious about their need for data, you could view this as their attempt to check they're using your money to insure your own car.

 

Use email if you want to save on postage but send the proof documents by post for security.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Slick132

Maybe I would also think like you if they asked me in the beginning and not 3 months into the policy 🙂.

 

Regardless of their need for data is genuine or not there's a definite ignorance of data security here by lack of defined policy on this matter. We all read companies getting hacked or misplaced customer data which is one potential reason why you found fraudsters having access to your bank details in the first place. Again no mention on data protection by 1st central on this matter so they could be selling my data to dodgy third parties using unencrypted channels without my consent for all I know. What happened to GDPR here? 

 

I can see why banks steps in with checks as they are legally bounded by it and it hits their bottomline. Just not convinced why 1st Central would stand into this "policing" role.

 

Going back to the genuine need of the data, logically there 3 possible outcomes when I submit the requested information:

1) policy continues, no problem.

2) changes to the policy: £50 plus whatever increase due to new information

3) cancel policy: £75 deducted, remaining policy refunded. 

 

Either way they have profited from "someone's" account. I'm not sure they would care where the money came from once the bank have authorised it.

 

Maybe there's some new law that insurance companies have to do more with due diligence and/or the frauds are hurting this finances somehow. Hence why I asked if this is going to be the new norm? Are other insurance companies also requesting this level of data?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

@MigsterThanks for the link to the privacy policy.

 

The story continues unfortunately:  

 

I posted the requested info and had it tracked & signed via Post Office (3rd Sep). Email 1st Central the tracking number straight after. Expected a confirmation within 5 working days as per their policy to state whether everything is accepted or not.

 

Heard nothing but 1 month later (01 Oct) I got an email saying "Unfortunately we are unable to locate the item you have sent to us in the post. We have tried to complete a track and trace on the Royal mail website to confirm it was signed for using the reference number you have provided but the site does not appear to be working at this time and will not carry out the search on your reference number."

 

I went on the Royal Mail website and the tracking detail works fine; I just email them a screen shot of this stating it was signed and delivered 1 month ago so now I'm questioning whether they are saying the Royal Mail did not fulfil their service to deliver the mail or they have lost/mishandled my private data in their process (which brings back the original question in the title). The usual threat of policy cancellation after 10 calendar days if I don't sent them the information.

 

From the start I refused to email my personal data via un unencrypted email hence I posted it which was the option they suggested I do.  I think I've done everything within reason and complied to all their request but they keep asking for something different every month with continuous threats to cancel my policy.

 

Will appreciate any advise and how best to deal with this as it's getting tiring with no clear indication when they will be satisfied.  

The final option is to cancel the policy myself but I don't see why I have to take the financial penalty for it.  

Many Thanks.

 

Edited by nightkid
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...