Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CEL ANPR PCN PAPLOC now Claimform - Morrisons, Butterfly Walk Car Park Denmark Hill Camberwell, London SE5 8RW - paid-did not enter Reg No - POPLA rejected appeal


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 386 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Wish I had found this place sooner as have obviously stuck my foot in it proceeding with appeals, hoping I might be able to get some advice anyhow.

 

I received a parking ticket for the car park outside of Morrisons in Camberwell, London, as I didn't think parking was that technical, I ignored the signage, proceeded into Morrisons, got change, came back out, put £2 in the machine and thought nothing of it. I then spent £10 in store to redeem my parking charge and went about life thinking nothing more about it.

 

I then received a £100 as it turns out you need to input your registration number, I obviously didn't keep my parking ticket so evidently I'm shafted.

 

I appealed via the CE website, stating the above, which was rejected, and then again to POPLA which has again been rejected (this time showing my bank statement with an £8 charge at Morrisons).

 

Citezens advice say I could go to small claims over the ticket, but with a lack of evidence and no response from Morrisons I'm a bit buggered.

 

Does any one have any advice on how I should proceed, or should I pay the £100 and never frequent a car park of this nature again?

 

Just very crappy timing to have had to Pay £102 to go to Morrisons.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

DM

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • FTMDave changed the title to CEL PCN - Morrisons, Camberwell, London - POPLA rejected appeal

I've changed the thread title as it's not a fine, and it's important to know the difference when taking on these fleecers.

 

You have a great chance of seeing off CEL.

 

So you haven't kept the parking ticket.  What about a receipt from Morrisons, is there anywhere where £10 - £2 parking charge paid = £8 is shown?

 

In supermarket cases we generally advise to get on to the supermarket head office, show you were a genuine customer and demand they cancel the fleecers' invoice.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for correctly labelling my post, apologies, first time on the site.

 

Alas no, I have no documentation stating I purchased a ticket, my only hope would be getting the CCTV from Morrisons. I could follow up to see if they could confirm my purchase? Bank statement shows nothing except "£8 at a Morrisons"

 

Unfortunately the only response I got back from Morrisons, was a 'sorry it's nothing to do with us email'. Which was charming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the Forum.

Don't be too despondent, there is more than one way to skin a cat and these parking companies usually make more mistakes than motorists which is bad news for them.

 

You paid so they would have had your money in the machine without a corresponding registration number at the end of the day. 

Even if you didn't enter the reg. number, they still have to comply with several Laws and Regulations before they manage to form a contract with motorists.

 

As they are more concerned with ripping off motorists than complying with Laws, they are usually pretty easily beaten.

 

To help us come up with all the reasons why they shouldn't get a penny from you could you please complete the questions below.

 

Could you please post up the PCN you received.

I don't expect you will have the next one which is the Notice to Keeper as your appeal would probably have shown that you were the driver, but if you have, please post that up also.

 

Photographs of the signs are really a must, especially the one at the entrance and the blurb on the ticket machine

 as well as signage around the car park -ones that have different rules than the entrance ones are great.

 

Also these parking crooks rarely bother to get permission from the Council to erect their signs and cameras'

This means that the signs should not be there and so cannot offer a contract with the motorist.

 

Most Councils have a website for their planning department which often just require the postcode to be inserted in the search area.

Do not be surprised if nothing relevant appears.

 

.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the errors all, and your help.

 

1 Date of the infringement 2 July 2020
 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]  02/07/2020
 

[scan up BOTHSIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide]

 

3 Date received  2 weeks later?
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]  N
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?  Have contacted Morrisons about the incident, there should be CCTV, if it hasn't been deleted
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]  Y

 

It was filled out online, appeal was rejected as I had no evidence to support my claim, beside payment to Morrisons on my bank statement.
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up  Y...Appeal rejected.
 

7 Who is the parking company? Civil Enforcement
 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Morrisons, Butterfly walk, Camberwell, London, SE5 8RW
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Further appealed via POPLA which was again rejected
 

 

DM-PCNs.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to CEL ANPR PCN - Morrisons, Butterfly Walk Car Park Denmark Hill Camberwell, London SE5 8RW - paid-did not enter Reg No - POPLA rejected appeal

 

Sorry-I should have reminded you to delete all your private details.

Wow you do move fast on getting things done. 

 

It seems like there must be a fault with the machine that allows you to pay without your registration number.

 

Thanks for the photos-they are a big help.

 

First is the sign at the entrance has no rules on it which means that the rules in the car park do not have to be observed as the entrance sign is an invitation to treat not offering you a contract.

The rules are too small to be enforceable on some of their notices at least.

 

Lastly but the most important is that the signs are from ABC parking Solutions, but it is CEL who appear to be asking for money. They cannot do that-it is ABC's signage.

 

Write to DVLA and ask who sent for your information.

If it was CEL, the DVLA have breached your GDPR and tell them that and ask for an explanation as this is not the first time they have been caught out by CEL. 

 

I have not found ABC on either BPA or IPC member lists....

 

Do not let CEL know as if they take you to Court in their name they lose. 

 

I am surprised that Morrisons are not cancelling the ticket anyway. You paid.

You complained quickly.

I guess you would have had to show your ticket to them to get the reduction?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought that Morrisons would have accepted that as you paid £2 less that you must have had a ticket regardless of the reg. number being missing.

In the Stikkies at the top of the Private Motoring section is a template that you can use for the DVLA though you may have to improvise when it comes to the breach of GDPR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for help all,

 

Morrisons again came back and said, 'it's a private car park, so nothing to do with us.' I've emailed back asking about proof of purchase or CCTV data, but with no response yet.

 

Also messaged the DVLA on data requests. As mentioned on the demonstration letter, it says the .gsi email address isn't active any more I've instead gone directly to @ dvla.gov.uk and received an automated response that it had been received, so will let you know what they say.

 

All the best

Link to post
Share on other sites

how did you pay for your shopping?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesnt maters shows you used morrisons.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have online banking list your transactions for around that date   it should show the money spent there with date, screen dump it and keep a file.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, this is what I sent through to the second appeal, alas to no resolution.

 

Hoping on Morrisons actually helping out, otherwise the data request from the DVLA is sort of my last option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop falling for their rubbish...

the issue here is you appealed

never appeal.

 

removes your protection under pofa as you ID'd the driver..

then they are like a dog with a bone.

 

simply ignore them now until/unless they send a letter of claim.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DVLA is nowhere near your last option.

 

First of all you paid, so you owe them nothing.

Also to charge you £100+ for not entering your reg number is of secondary importance and so the charge would be considered a penalty.

 

Also their entrance signs are not enough to offer motorists a contract.

Equally their T&Cs are too small.

Did you manage to check that they had planning permission for their signage and cameras? 

 

You gave the impression that Morrrison were the ones who counted the money in the cash machine.

If so then their claim that it is a private car park and nothing to do with them is dubious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a few signage applications, but haven't found the cameras yet.

 

This is the only application I've found that specifically references the Car Park so far:

https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications-old/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9532383&activeTab=summary

Link to post
Share on other sites

cracking research yewneik...wish all people were like you that come here!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, seems I've been absolutely fleeced on this one.

 

Have spoken to the manager of Morrisons, all transaction records are scrubbed after 28 days, as is CCTV footage. So no way to verify my purchase.

 

They also wash their hands of any responsibility, stating even their bosses get tickets and they can't get out of it.

 

All CCTV outside the store is owned by the car park. So possibility I could request it under GDPR, but almost certain they won't have a camera on the pay and display machine.

 

Signage on entrance to the car park does not show Terms and conditions, but does state see other signage for T&C's. so 50/50 on that avenue.

 

Signage in the car park does state Civil Enforcement will handle the follow up, so the idea of an incorrect company coming after me is also out the window.

 

Parking meters do not state the terms and conditions, but it irritatingly does say enter your registration number. Not sure if I've got anything with that.

 

Attached images of parking meter.

 

Other than this I think I'm royally stuffed,

 

Unless anyone can see a way around it I'm just going to stump up as I have a feeling these guys are very happy to go to small claims court or call up the bailiffs.

 

Thanks for all your help anyway.

 

DM

Morrisons_Denmarkhill_Ticketmachine.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...