Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • she ignores moorcroft totally a negative PP balance cant appear on her credit file.  
    • just has an email about claim 1 - trial 7 days away     their solicitor- 'heres some further disclosure, your broker says you agreed to pg ' so just pay up and lets avoid cout!     cue list of emails between two people , with no one else cc'd or copied in   i said unless xx and xx have provided a witness st and are going to be cross examined at court, this is inadmissable hearsay (its never been disclosed) weve never seen or heard of any of it. (to note this was not presented as supplementary, paginated etc so obv was meant for my eyes only and hasnt been sent to court)   they may have had a lovely conversation, but where are we involved or proof this has been sent or included to us (it hasnt)   so bugger off
    • Hi Guys, just a quick update,     I now have all the information VCS hold on me and photos to show I was not in the fuel station as they claim. The date of the 14/02 has passed for their threat to take me to court how long should i expect to wait to hear from them?   Also should i include in my appeal that the fact they couldn't issue me 2 x PCN's had this happened in a car park (as by their own charter you are allowed a 10 minute grace period)   how can they do it on a private road, and as it is a private road when i asked them for a breakdown of the costs incurred that lead them to the figure of £100 they quoted to me the case of Bevis v parking eye to justify the amount, however i feel this is not relevant as this event took place in a car park. cheers
    • I think this needs to be settled in a court of law and I don't think any other method is at all acceptable. It needs to be open, transparent and beyond doubt.   As you have had a possible disclosure I think it is reasonable to to write them and inform them  the disclosure they have made is incomplete and so therefore they are still in breach of their strategy obligations. that you are extending your time before you issue proceedings buy a further 7-days but after that you will definitely be issuing proceedings and there won't be any further discussion. I think you have to take this approach in order to show the judge that you have been doing everything you can to be reasonable and to be co-operative even though they have failed in their duty.              
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Currys - 2018 iPad gone faulty - can I claim under Consumer Rights Act?

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 193 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi, I’m looking for some advice before approaching the retailer about this in case anyone has similar experience and advice...


I bought an iPad Pro from Dixons at Heathrow airport  in July 2018, and it has just stopped working. Tried restoring it using different computers, cables etc, all the things that Apple advise, and based on an online search it sounds like it’s a hardware issue (it’s an “error 4013” issue that can be software related, but if the steps I’ve already taken don’t work, it’s down to hardware)


As it’s out of warranty, Apple have quoted me a flat £350 for a repair - which sounds outrageous if it turns out to be a simple fix, at least to me! I took it to a local Apple specialist instead, but they have just come back to say they can’t fix it and that I should look into claiming against the Consumer Rights Act.

From what I’ve read this states that goods must be 'fit for purpose' AND 'last a reasonable length of time' - so do you think that just over 2 years would qualify? The iPad has been looked after really well, and has always had a protective case and screen protector on (I’m paranoid about expensive electronics and don’t take any chances!) There’s no visible damage at all.


I’m not sure how to go about this, and how difficult Dixons/ Currys are likely to be, and would like to go in to the process well prepared as I’m sure they will do their best to reject any claim... and I don’t want to waste my time or theirs if this is a non-starter.


Any advice would be much appreciated - thanks in advance!



Link to post
Share on other sites

Any item you buy has to be in satisfactory condition and remain that way for a reasonable period of time.

I agree with you that an iPad bought in 2018 should still be working.  However you have had at least 2 years use from it and so you should not expect to receive a new replacement or a full refund.

If the reasonable life expectation of the item is,say,6 years, then you have enjoyed one third of its value and you could only expect a refund of two thirds its value or two thirds the cost of repairs.


Of course you could try for more but be prepared to settle for that.


Dixon's/Currys will spend far more than the value you are seeking to defeat you and deprive you of your consumer rights


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much - sounds like it is worth a try.

I wouldn’t expect a full refund or new replacement as you say, but I do feel that an iPad shouldn’t become a brick after 2 years and 1 month when I haven’t damaged it!


Does anyone know the best way to start the process to minimise all the inevitable “no” responses and escalations?!

And has anyone had success with anything like this?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • dx100uk changed the title to Currys - 2018 iPad gone faulty - can I claim under Consumer Rights Act?

Have you approached dixons about this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have slightly retitled your thread

and moved it to the currys forum.


have a read of a few threads here:



have you a faulty report from apple on this already that you can use ?






please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both - so far I haven’t approached Dixons/ Currys yet as I wasn’t sure of the best and most direct way to get to someone who can/ will help.


I’ve been through a diagnosis with Apple by phone, which resulted in “ok, you’ve done everything you can without sending it in” and the recommendation to take or send it in, with the repair quote being a flat £350 (refundable if they can’t repair it, but this seems really steep). I only got that cost verbally, rather than via email - so should I request an email stating this, and then forward that to Currys to give them the option of looking into arranging a repair?


I would rather not pay £350 upfront with no guarantee of getting anything back...

Edited by Holly24
Link to post
Share on other sites

You should certainly have approached the supplier as your first step.  Of course they will knock you back but you need to get that on paper and their reasons why and maybe a quote for repairs.

If you get their own quote for repairs then you won't need to get anything else.


Also you need to get the Apple quote in writing

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...