Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Axa taking other party to court


swanseafan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1309 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My former insurance company Axa, is taking the other party to court to reclaim their outlay 

This will be in My name because legally the claim has to be in my name?

Axa said it was 50/50 claim, so Axa paid me out.

 

Can this be done in my name without my permission?

Axa said it was 50/50 why are Axa going after the other driver? i thought Axa would pay me, the other party paid by their insurance company? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you refuse 

they cant do that without your permission.

 

arent arguing over hire car costs are they?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can ask you to help them.

 

The reason for doing this is that the accident was between two private citizens with the Insurance companies covering the risk.  The Insurance company need your assistance to claim directly against the other driver, as the other drivers Insurance are not paying the claim.  Each Insurers pays 50% of the claim costs.  

 

If you don't help the Insurers, I am not sure what they can do about this, as you are no longer a customer of theirs.

 

Perhaps ask whether they will cover your costs. e.g. time. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

i can claim for my excess and loss of earnings as i was self employed and cost for hire of van,

solicitors have asked for uninsured losses, if losses are not included in claim i cant recover them at later date the letter states.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dx100uk said:

no you refuse 

they cant do that without your permission.

 

arent arguing over hire car costs are they?

 

 

Do they need the insured's permission?  Won't the insured have agreed for the insurer to have conduct of any claims and to assist in any court case(s)?

 

I don't understand why the OP is reluctant to assist their former insurer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

not if they want to make the OP the named claimant no!!

let them take the other party to court themselves!!

the op can be a witness then..

 

one bitten...read this thread..

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if this is a claim for all losses including your uninsured losses I am not sure why you would not be assisting. The court claim in your name as you are the party looking to recover losses as a result of the accident. The Insurers or their legal people will do all of the work.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

So if this is a claim for all losses including your uninsured losses I am not sure why you would not be assisting. The court claim in your name as you are the party looking to recover losses as a result of the accident. The Insurers or their legal people will do all of the work.

 

This is what I don't understand.  Why wouldn't the OP co-operate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, dx100uk said:

not if they want to make the OP the named claimant no!!

let them take the other party to court themselves!!

the op can be a witness then..

 

one bitten...read this thread..

 

 

 

 

Surely the insurer's are operating on behalf of their insured?  The insurers have made some sort of payout to the OP, and the OP ought to be assisting them in recovering it?

 

(Apologies if I've missed something obvious - I may have done! - but it seems pretty clear to me...)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes but let the insurers raise the claim then not use a member of joe public as the claimant...

if the case is lost, do you really think the insurers will pay the costs against a joe public as claimant?

 

not saying dont assist which is why i said they can appear as a witness, 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter states this.

Whilst it will be a claim for what my insurers have paid out, legally the claim has to be in my name? as i was the owner of the vehicle.

why cant Axa just take the other insurance company/other party to court.

A van hit my van on a single track, the other party was going too fast and couldnt stop in time, my insurance company said right away 50/50, lose your NCB and insurance goes up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I remember correctly from when I was a law student 40 years ago, your insurance would be able to sue the third party in it's own right if something called the doctrine of subrogation(?) applied.  This means that the insurance company would be using "subrogation" to itself enforce your legal rights against the third party.

 

But if subrogation does not apply, then the third party would have to be sued by you in your own name because the insurance company has no other legal rights it can enforce against the third party.

 

I'm assuming that in your case any claim against your third party cannot be subrogated by your insurer?

 

(Whether all this which I think I can remember from 40 years ago still applies I don't know!  I'm sure unclebulgaria or dx100 do).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest that you contact AXA and discuss this with them.

 

Believe what @Manxman in exile has just posted sounds familiarly correct and AXA will be able to answer this.

 

Better to get it from the horses mouth ( AXA), rather than continue a debate on here.  AXA may be able to provide more information. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah - ask AXA.  You don't want to rely on 40 year old shaky memories from me!

 

Try asking something like:  "Why do you need to bring the claim against the third party in my name?  Doesn't the contract of insurance between us work in such a way that after you've made a payout to me, any legal rights I may have against the third party transfer to you, and you, Axa, can sue them in your own name?"

 

You mentioned "uninsured losses" in #4 (and unclebulgaria did in #7) and it may be that AXA are telling you that for you to recover those from the third party (because those losses are not covered by AXA) that you (or AXA?) need to sue the third party in your own name.  Do you follow?  If that's the case, you probably want them to go ahead for you...

 

It does sound a bit strange and perhaps not what you would expect to be happening - especially if 50:50.  You need to ask AXA for a full explanation as to why they need to proceed this way.  Ask what happens if you don't consent.  If they can't give you any answers that make sense, come back here.

 

See what others say about my suggested question to AXA.

 

IMPORTANT - Ask them the question dx100 asks.  If the claim is brought in your name but the claim is lost, who picks up both sides costs?  (I think it has to be between AXA and the third party insurers, but ask to be sure).

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 15/08/2020 at 14:37, dx100uk said:

yes but let the insurers raise the claim then not use a member of joe public as the claimant...

if the case is lost, do you really think the insurers will pay the costs against a joe public as claimant?

 

not saying dont assist which is why i said they can appear as a witness, 

 

It's not just a random Joe Public though, it's their own customer. 

 

I would imagine the OP agreed in the insurance T&Cs to allow the insurers to bring a claim in his/her name and to cooperate with them. 

 

At the end of the day, if the OP wants his excess, load of earnings and hire back then just go along with it. 

 

The insurance company will cover the legal fees if the case loses. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...