Jump to content


credit card claim struck out.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 303 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, if a terminated credit card claim has been struck out by the court, appealed and lost (ie still struck out) - is the balance therefore zero?

Can a 2nd claim for the same card (terminated>6yrs ago) be presented against me for a different amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No striking out a claim does not render the amount to nil...the debt remains. Second claims...possible.....if its assigned to a new DCA and the amount of claim differs along with the particulars.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, bit more info i should have stated.

 

The claim was started within the 6 years stat limitation.

the hearing was after 6 years had expired and so was the strike out.

 

It is now 8 years past default notice, and i have not heard anything since strike out for 1.5 years.

surely another claim for the same terminated account is time barred, even if they change the amount to a lesser amount.

 

the issue is the oc bank has written to me stating i am due a refund of wrongly taken charges and interest FROM 2011 and have applied the refund to the os balance, which is with the purchaser company who was struck out.

 

The oc say they have informed the purchaser of the revised balance, which means the claim against me by the purchaser was for the wrong balance.

 

surely this does not mean they could use this balance for a new claim 8 years later?

 

this smells like a trick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the payment is not by you so does not reset the time bar.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

un-en doesn't mean its written off but SB'd passing does..

and no why should you get the money??

 

they are notional charges that weren't paid by you anyway in the 1st place as there is was outstanding balance greater than the refund.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...