Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aktiv Kapital/IND CCJ /AEO - old MBNA Card Debt - Help


LuckY-13
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1344 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon All,

I have joined the site as I am really needing some help on building my credit and may post a few as I have ignored many things in past but building for a better future now.

 

with this in mind I have sourced as much information as possible on an AOE for a company called IND LTD.

I have emailed contact in confirming the debt and to who it it was against.

 

I believe this was an old MBNA account sold to Aktiv Kapital then to IND LTD.

I will update as soon as I have all the details.

 

I have pulled off the report and it shows Aktiv Kapital.

I have no proof of the account information when I was summoned to court to show my outgoings and earnings back in 2015.

I asked for up to date records thinking the courts would help

 

the next thing I knew was the order against my wages for £70.00 per month.

I have since paid £4'4100.00 of a so called debt of £8162.33.

 

Could anyone advise of what I need to ask when I call IND LTD as it seems reading across the internet Aktiv Kapital were very aggressive and forced payments upon people.

 

I have seen no prrof of debt even at court and I agree to having owned an MBNA account many years ago but not to this amount of debt.

 

Any help will be a great help,

LuckY-13

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to the forum.

 

I have moved your topic to the Financial legal Issues forum in view of the AOE Order...please continue to post here to your topic.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you know when the CCJ was attained?

and when you took the card out?

 

was this a default backdoor CCJ at an old address you knew nothing about?

 

can you expand upon the timeline of your story please

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good afternoon dx,

 

The CCJ is not showing anywhere and I am trying to find this information as this is not listed on my credit report.

The card I am thinking this was a very long time ago maybe from 17 years ago!?

 

I wasn't aware of the debt until summoned from the courts at the address I was residing at this would not have been the account address, 

I do remember an MBNA account but I do not remember running up any debts to this amount as my credit limit would not have been so high. I am waiting back on IND to advise dates and confirm the Aktiv Kapital is the debt.

 

Sorry its a long time ago and have buried my head for some time,

 

I have just checked and the email from the courts advise "

 

The case is still live (although due to its age, The judgment should no longer appear on your credit file), And has been receiving payments consistently since may 2015.

 

The case is being administered by County Court at ********** and the Payee is IND LTD.

I have the contact number so I can obtain more information,

 

This is all they advise from the Courts and to contact them if I need to get in touch.

 

Thanks

LuckY-13

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Aktiv Kapital/IND CCJ /AEO - old MBNA Card Debt - Help

so the AEO was in 2015, so the CCJ can't be much older than this.

 

email that court and ask for a copy of the original Claimform and the CCJ itself

 

i will guess you moved at some point in time after taking the card out and didn't inform your creditors

hence ind for their client AK knew they could file everything to an old address  and get away with it?

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes 2015 May was my first payment and agreed the debt is somewhere before this,

 

The Court were very helpful in given me all the information and a statement of the account yet Aktiv  never responded to me with any details when requested these.

 

I will email the court and ask for the above- yes I have moved around a few times since that account had been taken out. So the thinking is they could simply push on when they knew I was not responding ?

 

Will let you know what the courts say as they were pretty quick last time I tried to resolve this issue

 

Thanks again

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although, the CCJ having dropped off the register will not be affecting your credit score at all.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It can't hurt your Credit Score now, but you need to find out all the details as in was likely chock full of unlawful fees to bump the value up.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Brassnecked,

 

Thanks and I think my credit is not affected either, Would i be able to reverse any excess unlawful charges if i cab obtain all the details from courts as I did email them yesterday for the full history as advised by dx100uk.

 

I have paid well over half of this so called debt over the last 5 years and with taking a pay cut to help the business I work for its a bit tight at the moment.

 

LuckY-13

Link to post
Share on other sites

not via the courts..via mbna

sar mbna get all the statements.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You state you have taken a pay cut.......check the AOE Protected earnings here :-

 

https://www.gov.uk/debt-deductions-from-employee-pay/deductions-for-nonpriority-order

 

 

The amount taken by an attachment of earnings is set by the court. They will set a protected minimum amount of income which you must get each month. This is called the protected earnings rate. The attachment will only be taken from earnings above this amount.

Your creditor won’t be able to get an attachment of earnings order if your take home pay is always below the protected earnings rate.

You must inform the creditor straight away if you stop working or change jobs or your income changes.

 

Inform them of a change of circumstances if your income level has dropped...and reduce the AOE.

 

Andy

 

 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LuckY-13 said:

So once I have all the information I can contact MBNA ? and then try to go from there ?

Thanks DX

 

send an sar now.

the more info you gather the better picture we will have

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dx100uk said:

not via the courts..via mbna

sar mbna get all the statements.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning All,

 

Today I have received the email from the Courts in respect the account held with MBNA confirmed. The information reads as :

 

Claimant Claims: Credit Card Account Number ********************* Balance of £6'850.61 as of 31/01/2010. Interest under s69 of the County Court Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from the default date(s) to 21/2011 of £804.81 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of 1.50 and costs.

 

The maths now show as

Amount Claimed £7655.42

Court Fee £190.00

Solicitors Costs £100.00

total £7'945.42

Date of issue 21-July-2011

 

Underneath it then shows

To the Defendant

you have not replied to to the claim form ( I went to the courts to discuss my income )

It is therefore ordered you must pay the claimant £7'692.33 for the debt ( and interest to date of judgment) and £320.00 for costs.

You must pay the claimant the total of £8'012.33 forthwith.

 

I now have the account number for this account and I have written to MBNA which was delivered and proof of delivery obtained with signature.

Would it best be to contact them again as I have no statements in regards to the full account statements and proof of the final account balances as I am 100% sure this was far too high a balance.

 

Thanks everyone

LuckY-13

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The judgment is almost 10 years old LuckY....Im not really sure what you are trying to achieve here as any attempt to mitigate with the original creditors will also be over 10 years...and now statue barred....I would concentrate on the AOE and try to reduce it or check they are stopping the correct amount.....the rest is history.

 

Andy

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court that issued the AOE.

 

You can apply to the court to change the order if you think too much money is being taken out of your wages. You’ll have to pay to change to the order. Check to see if you can get help on GOV.UK.

You’ll need to complete a form called ‘N244’ and explain why you can’t afford the payments. You can find form N244 on GOV.UK.

You’ll have to go to court for a hearing and a judge will decide if they can change the order.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check the deductions are correct first by using the link I posted earlier...if there not you will have to make application as above.....with fee.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have a good relationship with your employer...they may be able to sort it for saving you further expense....but you must check the protected income guide first to see if they are over deducting....before venturing with either of the above.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

Thanks for this, my wages have increased since the AOE so with this in mind I cannot see any change now even with the wage cut this morning we have learnt we will be back on full pay from next month. I guess this has taught me not to ignore as I think the figures will show not over deducting.

just a bitter pill to swallow as I do not remember the debts being so big.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...