Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep   Matt Hancock United Nations job offer withdrawn WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Anti-poverty campaigners protested over his role in blocking vaccines for developing world  
    • I hope you noticed that your posts have had to be restructured first of all my my site team colleague and then your second post by myself. Please can you present your posts properly spaced and punctuated. It's extreme difficult for people to follow when they are in solid blocks of text – especially when people using small screen such as telephones. Thank you. Please stand by for a fuller reply later
    • So far the declared value is confirmed and documemted the first Claim got agreed and they kept delaying saying the refund will show 5-7 days for BACS but that not true!   I VE been chaising this since 28th september, told on 2nd October I needed to send my bank details again as they seemed they got it wrong but not my fault yet they had it since 2nd October! Thats over 2 weeks! I   GET Money via bank bacs and from Europe and recently in 3 Days and in the UK its same day and instant!   They re messing me about and nothing else!   For contents its a Marshall  speaker small Bluetooth one value 127.99   And 2nd parcel stolen last week and an empty bag delivered yesterday for Marshall Headphones value 121.99 all sold via verifiable links and invoices and all fully covered to its value, and payment all proven as well as refunds.   The first claim was agreed but still no payment   2nd Claim had to file it yesterday and he re the empty bag!
    • Yes it will be straightforward – but you may as well give us better information so we can check that everything is in a row. What was in the parcels? When were they sent? Was the value correctly declared? I understand you had insurance.   Have you been formerly declined compensation? If so then what was the reason given?   Also, you need to spend some time reading up on the Hermes threads on this sub- forum so that you understand the way it goes. It is pretty well always the same. It's essential that you understand the steps and so it is essential that you do the reading. In addition to answering the questions above, please confirm that you have done the reading or the you will be doing it.
    • In order for an NTK to be compliant it has to comply with PoFA. If it is not compliant then the keeper cannot be held liable for the PCN.    I have included the wording from S8 though  s9 is identical in the part I have copied below. You will see that at the beginning  "The Notice  'must' " which in Law means the wording  is to be stictly observed   (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;   (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full;   (c)state that a notice to driver relating to the specified period of parking has been given and repeat the information in that notice as required by paragraph 7(2)(b), (c) and (f);   (d)if the unpaid parking charges specified in that notice to driver as required by paragraph 7(2)(c) have been paid in part, specify the amount that remains unpaid, as at a time which is— (i)specified in the notice to keeper, and   (ii)no later than the end of the day before the day on which the notice is either sent by post or, as the case may be, handed to or left at a current address for service for the keeper (see sub-paragraph (4));   (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper—   (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges; or   (ii)if the keeper was not the driver of the vehicle, to notify the creditor of the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and to pass the notice on to the driver;   (f)warn the keeper that if, at the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to keeper is given—   (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges (as specified under paragraph (c) or (d)) has not been paid in full, and   (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver,   the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid;   (g)inform the keeper of any discount offered for prompt payment and the arrangements for the resolution of disputes or complaints that are available;   (h)identify the creditor and specify how and to whom payment or notification to the creditor may be made;   (i)specify the date on which the notice is sent (if it is sent by post) or given (in any other case).   If you compare that with the NTK you were sent you will see that your one does not include  "   (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) "   Your NTK also states that if you don't pay the £100 that you will be liable for debt collection charges up to £60. this contradicts section 4 of PoFA where it covers the right of the parking crooks to pursue motorists   [5] (5)The maximum sum which may be recovered from the keeper by virtue of the right conferred by this paragraph is the amount specified in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(c) or (d) or, as the case may be, 9(2)(d) (less any payments towards the unpaid parking charges which are received after the time so specified).   So their NTK is non compliant in two places.    In any event Ambreen is wrong to declare that if they cannot pursue the keeper than they can assume that the keeper was the driver. The court will not entertain that idea -VCS need to provide strict proof that the keeper is the driver.   So despite Ambreen claiming that they can proceed against the keeper she is wrong. [17,18 and !9 of her WS].   They quote Parking Eye v Beavis   [22] which is irrelevant since that was a free car park and yours is a residential parking space covered by a lease which VCS cannot overturn.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

PRA and Old Cap1 Card Debt - Now A Letter Of Claim


finaldj
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 420 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks for opening the thread.

 

It's been a while since I updated this. So just a catch up.

 

I had a number of debts some are still outstanding and just gone into default and handed over to LCS who as been trying to contact me.

 

PRA group has 2 debts and had them since last year although they have only been emailing me they decided to start writing to me.

 

The 2.5k debt I'm just getting emails at the moment.

 

The capital one debt they threatend litigation in writing so I shot off a CCA request last week and they've come back with some information.

 

A copy of the original agreement which has my first address on where I lived in 2010 and a list of statements dating back to 2010 - 2015 ending in 2015 when I got into debt with the card.

 

They have given me 10 days to respond so at this stage should I offer a form of affordable month payments?

 

The total debt is £1100

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no scan up their supposed CCa response

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've taken out my name and address and blanked where my name was on the digital signature.

 

The other stuff they sent was statements on what was spent on the card from 2010-2015.

 

Which seems to tally up on stuff I recognise using the card for.

 

I followed the guide thanks

 

CCa return.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats not an enforceable CCA return as there are pages of T&C's referred too on the 1st sheet that they've not sent.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm interesting

the right to cancel box should be part of the CCA that you signed and they cant omit it..

 

i wonder if them say its not invalidates the whole agreement.

as its not part of the prescribed terms and it should be under the act.

 

cap1 have you screwed up here for arrows...that's a shame.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really? So the bit that says "additional information" this does not form part your credit agreement should form part of it?

 

OR have I missed something? it looks legit to me but you'll know better.

 

What should I do I this stage?

the statement they have sent shows what has been spent on the card so look pretty legit would be hard to argue?

 

Should I just ignore them,

 

Offer an affordable payment

 

or

 

Wait and see if they take it to court and stand my ground there?

 

I appreciate the help

 

The right to cancel as shown in the PDF document is there but it's on an additional piece of paper should this look different?

 

Does everything else I've shown look legit?

 

Edited by finaldj
Link to post
Share on other sites

docs already merged to your CCA response pdf above.

 

it the wording that puzzles me..

this information does not form part of the CCA...but it must under the act

and must be on and within the 4 corners of the agreement you signed,,, its not  .

 

what any statements say is immaterial. Throw the morality card out the window.

 

pers i think arrows are flying a kite.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having dealt with PRA, I’d just ignore it, as long as they have your current address. Unless of course they send a letter before action.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi London,

 

I got a letter from PRA group on the 5th June stating that they bought the account on the 23/5/2019 and have been trying to resolve the matter since then.


Further down the letter it states that they have now passed the account to the investigation and litigation department to look at your outstanding debt and possible Litigation recovery.


They gave me 30 days to contact them to resolve the matter or they would consider the next stage in putting me on notice for court proceedings.


So I shot off a CCA request hence the top posts you've seen.

 

The letter is signed their legal team/solicitor

 

They have given me 10 days to respond to the CCA request they sent.

 

DX100,

 

I'm not familiar with the terms you use "pers i think arrows are flying a kite"

am I right in thinking it's not a proper T&C agreement they have sent?

 

it has my old address on it when I first took the card out and have moved another 2 addresses since then.


Do I hang fire at this point and just ignore them or get in contact now and offer some form of monthly payments?

Do you think at this stage they will probably start with court proceedings as per the letter dated 5th June or is that some made up scare tactics letter?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

99% of dca letters dont say WILL anything

read them properly 

 

not sure why you keep wanting to be fleeced by powerless dca's.................

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with @dx100uk.

 

It’s all hot air, until if /when you get a letter before action. Put it to the back of your mind and make sure you open all your mail.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've had a pack delivered today from Intrum 8 months later responding further to my CCA request.

They've included something similar to the last CCA request as above

I'll upload some of the documentation tomorrow to cast your eyes on if you can please.

I won't post all the credit agreement as it's 22 pages but I''ll show the relevant bits.

 

2 things I'm wondering

if a company produces a CCA are they more then likely to take court action?

if just ignored knowing they have this as evidence?

 

The other

I've had a company sell a loan on but with interest

it was double

are they allowed to sell on the interest along with the original loan amount?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

1.depends on the enforceability of the CCA return.

 

2. as for int, if that's what you signed up too ..

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ll just give you my experience. I’ve had many CCA requests back, and I still never paid them a penny. Not one of them took court action. They are all statute barred long ago. 
 

In fact the only DCA’s that took action against me were one’s Who I didn’t keep updated with my current address, and were able to gain a default judgment without my knowledge.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply back London.

 

Just to follow up on PRA group and the threat of court they have sent me a letter today "Letter before claim"

 

they've sent a pack with the letter that has some tick boxes that say things like, "I owe the debt" "I owe part of the debt" "I don't know whether I owe the debt"

 

They have given me 30 days notice and they've also sent a financial sheet to fill in.

 

The tick box form says I have 30 days to fill in the returns form if I dont it could result in court proceedings

 

This is a new kind of letter I have seen from a debt company is this something I need to take action on now or continue to ignore?

 

if need be I can upload picture of the written letter?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by finaldj
Link to post
Share on other sites

click letter of claim and read up!

 

whats the debt type and the OC?

 

have they complied with a CCa request yet?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX100

 

The debt is related to a capital one CC for just over 1k

 

 the other day I posted up copies of the CCA they sent back, you had a look at them?

 

I have had a look at the link for before claim.

 

As above they sent documentation already for the CCA and the letter they have sent today has a letter attached detailing the debt how much it is with zero interest and fees. there is also the PAP form and a financial sheet.

 

other than the CCA requested documents they sent last week it's just the above letters today.

 

The link of letter before claim states they should have sent copies of everything inc the default notice they sent?

 

do I still dispute the debt at this point or offer a form a payment now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you read and follow post 2 of the link andyorch posted

but ofcourse omitting the CCa request again and mention of it in the list of required documentation along with anything else they have already supplied

 

you could mention that the CCA return is not fully compliant with your prevoius CCa request

but not give the game away as to what is missing upon its prescribed terms.(no right to cancellation box etc )

 

dx

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I will be sending off the LBA forms on Monday.

 

Just wanted to double check to make sure I'm getting this right I read on another forum that someone else posted about a LBA that when they ask for further documentation this is what they should ask for

 

  • A Copy of the written contract for the debt
  • A full statement of account, including details of all interest and charges on the outstanding balance of the debt explaining how theyve been calculated, and any payments already made towards the debt.
  • A calculation of interest claimed
  • The annual or daily rate of interest
  • A description of the nature and amount of any administration charges included in the debt.
  • A copy of Notice(s) of assignment(s)
  • A copy of the Default Notice

The bits I showed you DX100 didn't have any of that just a copy of statements and some odd looking credit agreement so should I ask for the above listed as per the other forums suggestion?

 

If I do suggest the CCA didn't have all information do I need to do a new CCA letter and send it in with the LBA or can I just write in the box provided?

 

the LBA also asks for my name, date and signiture do I still stick to not putting my signiture down? just print my name still?

 

If this did end up in court and I lost how does this usually go in terms of asking me for the whole amount in say 30 days notice or do the courts likely agree to a payment plan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you follow post 2 in that related thread............

 

all of that list and what to do regarding cca request is already there...

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry but i know you too well.:pound:

that's why i specifically pointed it out earlier.

 

you always make silly schoolboy errors.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...