Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ghost_monkey Vs EGG some questions


ghost_monkey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6260 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi everyone

 

Have worked out Egg own me £134.00 in charges for going over limit based on info online ( only gone over in last year so could get all info that way rather than data request).

So i've sent them I letter outlining charges and requesting refund and they have replyed with standard no we are no paying letter.

I am now a bit concerned as owe £4000 on credit card and looking at threads here looks like they will counterclaim and i cant afford to pay that all yet. Have claims with Barclays and Capital one going through and this is the smallest amount, so was wondering how much of a fight it will be

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been reading a lot about this and it seems that if Egg tried to close your account and make you pay the outstanding balance, this would be indeed breaking the code of conduct so you could apeal against it (if it did happen... and I am not saying they would). Althouh you may not be able to stop them closing/freezing your account, you would legally have to come to some sort of mutual payment agreement, where you agreed to pay a certain amount back each month and no-longer had the facilities of the credit card.

 

There would be consumer outrage if you ended up in strife for no fault of your own other than trying to claim yor own money back.

 

This is my opinion based on various info I have read up on, as I too am trying to claim from egg.

 

best of luck... :-)

Moodle

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

help please

Sent letter to Egg saying charges unfair etc and how much i expected to be refunded.

Egg have sent a letter back offering to pay the £200.00 now however they have also included this paragraph at the end of the letter

" it is our view that our relationship with you as a customer has broken down and we will be writing to you shortly to teminate your agreement. Any amounts due at this point will need to be paid to Egg, and you will need to make appropriate arrangements with us."

So are they going to close my account whether I take the money or not?, is this legal?, and will it effect my credit rating?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi have settled this with egg a while ago but unlike other two claims against Barclays and capital when settled did not cross out confidentuality clause so was wondering if i should report anything on this site or just leave it at that

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are hardly likely to ask for it back if you break the confidentuality clause. I would write a letter to the court just to clarify that you did not accept their terms...

 

something like this... edit it to suit you:

 

Claim Number: ********

Claimant: ghost_monkey

Defendant: Egg Banking plc

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

I recently won my case by default and entered the judgement requesting immediate payment. I wish to confirm that I have now received a full settlement.

 

In the correspondence from Egg it states that the judgement I obtained is a full and final settlement of my claim and that payment is made with no admission of liability and is subject to my agreement not to court publicity, or disclose or refer to any third arty the background of this matter. The defendant also states I must keep the terms of this settlement strictly private and confidential. I wish to inform the court that I accept the sum of £*,***.00 as a settlement although I do not agree to the defendant’s added terms.

 

 

Your Faithfully

 

 

ghost_monkey

 

Either send it to the court who dealt with your claim... if it had gone that far... or alter it slightly and send it to the bank. It just covers your back... not that you probably need to, but it seems to be the general consensus.

 

Hope this helps... :-)

 

maxine

:-)

Moodle

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot see how reporting an outcome under a nom-de-plume can breach any confidentiality clause.

 

I don't think ghost_monkey meant it like that Mistermind... I think the offer with conditions has threw him/her a bit and that he/she wasn't sure what to do.

 

:-)

Moodle

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...