Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi again all, below is another email they sent me, I just don't want to get in trouble or things to get worse with this crowd but I am taking your advice here. Anyway advice would be appreciated.   I am contacting you again after having tried to contact you both by email on 03/04/2024 and 10/04/2024, and by telephone on 10/04/2024 and 17/04/2024 to discuss the matter in relation to the regularization of the SOLIDWORKS case against xxx our company.   This is an urgent legal matter. Please contact me at your earliest convenience - +44 2921 920 296.    If we do not recieve a response before 24/04/2024, we will assume that you are not willing to settle this dispute amicably. The case will then be referred back to our client with whom, ultimately, the final decision lies on the enforcement of their intellectual property rights.    Yours sincerel y, Rhys
    • If you do get a letter of Claim and or Pre Action Protocol pack 15. Where there has been non-compliance with a pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction, the court may order that (a) the parties are relieved of the obligation to comply or further comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (b) the proceedings are stayed while particular steps are taken to comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (c) sanctions are to be applied. 16. The court will consider the effect of any non-compliance when deciding whether to impose any sanctions which may include— (a) an order that the party at fault pays the costs of the proceedings, or part of the costs of the other party or parties; (b) an order that the party at fault pay those costs on an indemnity basis; (c) if the party at fault is a claimant who has been awarded a sum of money, an order depriving that party of interest on that sum for a specified period, and/or awarding interest at a lower rate than would otherwise have been awarded; (d) if the party at fault is a defendant, and the claimant has been awarded a sum of money, an order awarding interest on that sum for a specified period at a higher rate, (not exceeding 10% above base rate), than the rate which would otherwise have been awarded. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/pd_pre-action_conduct   .
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Thanks all! My wife was driving at the time (took our daughter to get new school uniform) and I wasn't there so I'm not sure what the signage was actually like, but yes, Parkopedia says 2:30, so it's barely over that. I will check it out with her when she gets home later, I haven't even told her about this yet as she'll probably be quite upset. So - likely my best response at this stage is to just wait it out until a Letter Before Claim arrives?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GDPR rules wife's employer


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1370 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My 6 year old wasn't well the other day had 1 episode of being sick and a mild temperature of 37.5c. Wife let work know who told her its company policy for her to go get a Covid swab. which she did and got the results back as negative 24hours later. We know what is was it was the pizza she had then night before didn't agree with her and her temp was back down to 36.4 not long after. Now her employer is asking what the rest of the house olds Covid swabs were?

 

I never bothered getting tested not that I needed to as I knew it wasn't Covid with her and being sick 9 hours before hand isn't going to show Covid results in that instance. But I work for the NHS and had a Antibody test this week that came back positive anyway as had C19 about 2 months ago.

 

The point being that her work said they need to know for track and trace. So whether I had the test or not I don't see why they would need to know my results? As she came back negative anyway that should be enough. I just feel that surley an employer I don't even know or work for has to know my medical record?

Link to post
Share on other sites

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the links I have just had a quick look but they only seem to refer to an employer you work for rather than say me getting a covid test and my employer wanting to know anyone else in the house what their test results were.

 

It might sound daft that she just has to let them know I didn't get it done or negative results so they know. But she has let them know her test result was negative and it should end there.

 

I don't see why her work place should need to know what my results or anyone else for that matter that doesn't work for them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically they don’t, but without knowing we would potentially insist on 14 days off sick (containment). I’m sure you know the results are not what you would class as accurate, so we will not take risks. Her employer is only protecting its workforce. If an employer is seen to be the source of an outbreak they can be shutdown for deep cleaning and directors could be fined. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A company cannot insist that any employee takes the test, unless there is such a requirement in the contract of employment that the employee has agreed to or the test is a legal requirement within legislation passed.  Of course they can cite public health grounds, government policy, but what is the exact legal requirement for the test.

 

And of course the company has no authority over third parties.

 

Just tell Wife to advise that others in household have not been tested after this recent scare. The company will then check guidance and perhaps your Wife stays off work for 14 days as a precaution.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand about protecting the work force but her work said she needed to send proof in by forwarding the text message onto them showing she was tested and what the result was. They also asked if I or anyone in the house was tested and what our results were for "track and trace" purposes.

 

Now I wasn't tested anyway but I work for the NHS my ward manager wasn't bothered about me being tested and my wife came back negative after 24 hours anyway.

 

I understand her work needing to inform those she's worked with that she's getting tested and they then have the option to have a test themselves which in theory they should have done. I just don't understand why they need to know my results if there is any it's not even relevent to them?

 

It would be upto me to tell my ward manager and between me and my company?

 

I'm not fussed in the sense I just told my wife to let them know I didn't get tested but how far do you go with Covid19 that even an employer you don't work for needs to know my business?

 

This isn't just aimed at me this is a general question of how far do you go if for example I was round a mates house they got the "virus symptoms" they let there employer know and get tested and tell their boss the results the boss then says what was your mates results.

 

Who has access to what information?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The organisation I work for advises that staff who have symptoms leading to a CV-19 test,  should request that the people they live with should also get tested and they would ask for details of the tests.  But they cannot insist on tests and certainly would have no rights to any third parties information. ( But there is the issue of disciplinary attendance procedures, which should be considered ) 

 

And you have different test arrangements, with some unable to travel to testing centres, having to wait 2 days to receive the test in the post and even if they send it back on the day the test is received, they don't get the result back for 3/4 days. Whereas those who travel to a test site, appear to get the result the next day.  Therefore more work days are lost, when people have postal arranged testing.

 

If you work for the NHS you will have no choice in the matter as your conditions of employment will no doubt require testing and you have to provide the result information.  You may also have to request the people who live with you to have tests done and if they agree to have tests, to share the information with your NHS managers.  I would think that if you failed to ask the people who lived with you to have tests and if you failed to share the information, there could be consequences.  

 

People working outside of the health sector or in jobs, where there is no contractual or legal requirements to have tests and share information, will be in a different position.  Then it would be a voluntary action to have tests and share any information.  BUT if the employers was to take any disciplinary actions in regards to attendance,  then the employee would be in a position of wanting to share information, if this was helpful to them. For those in this situation, always obtain advice via Union reps if a member or seek legal advice from a Solicitor that handles employment disputes if not a Union member.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely "track and trace" isn't the company's concern is it?  (I am perhaps mistaken, but I'm assuming track and trace is carried out by the NHS or some other public authority and it is their responsibility to do the tracking and tracing - not an individual's employer?)

 

I wouldn't want to cause your wife any bother with her employer, but if I were her and my employer asked me what my spouse's results were I'd say "I don't know.  He/she says it's none of my, or your, business."

 

As I say, I wouldn't want your wife to get into trouble over this, but I don't see that her employer is entitled to know your virus status or that of anyone else in your household.   It's up to you how far you take this.

 

NB - Is there a legal requirement on employers to do this?  I don't know - there may be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...