Jump to content


Smart Parking/CST Law ANPR PCN Letter Of Claim - Matalan Car Park - wrong reg - Medtia Square Oldham Manchester


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 362 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I find it more than annoying that CST appear to think that they can issue LBC's on the instruction of Debt Recovery who are an unlicensed debt collector and then have the cheek to add £15 to the account when there is no contract between the driver and the solicitor for such a charge especially as £60 has already been added and that has been adjudged unlawful in Court on many occasions. 

 

So I would be inclined to include EB's initial opening gambit  viz 

 

"You state that I should consider this to be a letter before action or letter before claim.

Unfortunately for you I cannot accept this shoddily thrown together piece of tripe to be a LBA as it fails miserably to come anywhere near a lba as required under the revised Civil Procedure Regulations and so would expect a court to summarily dismiss any claim later made by you or your client on that basis."  

               

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plus be in no doubt that any resulting claim would be defended robustly and vigorously, if they were to choose to proceed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

IF a claim is issued the points made about who is the client will certainly come back to bite the solicitors.

Credit Style, trading as CST law are governed by the FCA in the majority of their activates so this begs the question as to whether they have bought a regulated debt?

 

We know the answer to that so clearly they will have a problem unless Ms Jerk McGerk turns up in person ( see rights of audience).

 

Smart certainly aren't and don't seem to learn from their past mistakes so don't be upset if they don't drop the matter once they get their copy of whatever you do send to the useless solicitors.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok and thank you very much for all the time, effort and input you have all given me. 

 

You are all genius's!!

 

I am going to get on and type the letter back to them, so exciting!! 

 

I'll let you all know what happens next, if anything........

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers details are always available in file properties/info. of .doc .docx files

hidden 

use pdf only.

carefully read our upload guide

 

 

dx 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks bloody magnificent to me!

 

When you send it get a free certificate of posting from the post office.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much FTMDave, I wish I could take credit!!

I just wanted to make sure I had the context right.

 

You peeps on here are bloody marvelous.

 

Will post it tomorrow and will make sure I get the certificate of posting 👍😊🥳

 

I hope they leave me alone after this 😓

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...