Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Possible Issue With Sky Q After End of Contract


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1387 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I went from Virgin Media to Sky Q earlier this year as I wasn't a great fan of Tivo and was keen to try Sky Q.

 

When it was installed, I was offered the chance to replace my aging (ten year old) dish which I accepted.

 

In the last few days, I've come to the conclusion that Sky Q isn't for me and that I'd ideally like to downgrade it at the end of my contract to go back to using my old Sky+ HD box, which I still have.   Much to my surprise, I subsequently found out that the LNB on my dish would not be compatible as Q uses a special "wide band" LNB and the older boxes do not.

 

I contacted Sky to confirm this, which they did.   They also told me that there would be nothing they could do and that if I wanted to continue using my dish with my older box then I would have to pay to get it re-fitted myself which, after some investigation, would cost me at least £150 pounds.

 

The issue of future compatibility wasn't mentioned anywhere in the literature or the official Sky Q contract, but the Sky employee I was talking to agreed that it could present a problem and said that he would pass it "up the ladder" to see if the wording could be changed to better explain it to prevent any future problems - all the while telling me there was nothing they could do for me specifically.

 

I understand that I'm getting the service I paid for, which I have no issue with.   I understand that I'm only loaning the equipment and that it has to be returned at the end of the contract.   That I also have no problem with.   The contract also states that the dish becomes mine at the point of installation as well, which is also fine.

 

Basically, Sky have provided the service stated in the contract.

 

My problem with this is that Sky must clearly know that many people use, and still use, older boxes.   They still sell viewing cards for these older boxes, so that in itself should be enough to prove that they are aware of the compatibility issues between the two pieces of hardware.

 

Should there not have been even a small advisory akin to "Customers please note: Sky Q dishes are not compatible with older hardware" ?

 

By choosing to omit this information,  it not only prevented me from making an informed decision at installation, as I could have apparently asked for what's called a "Hybrid LNB" which would be compatible with older hardware, but it will also leave me significantly out of pocket at the end of the contract.

 

Is there anything in this ?.  Can I challenge this in any capacity ?.   Ideally, I'd like them to let me out of the Sky Q contract so I can downgrade to the Sky+ HD box I own, but I accept this will likely not be possible.

 

I'd be interested in your thoughts.   Thankyou.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In principle, what you are saying seems to be absolutely correct – but what you can do about it – I don't really know. I think it's very complicated situation and of course you are dealing with a big company that either won't listen to you very much for will simply roll over you.

I'm afraid I think that the simplest and most risk-free option here is to raise it is a complaint with the communications ombudsman – and don't hold your hopes up of getting a very satisfactory reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me that unless you had a detailed conversation with a Sky employee or contractor about your specific requirements before you signed up to the installation, there is not much you can do about the issues you have.

 

Perhaps you need to look at how Sky dealt with tailoring their services to suit your requirements and see whether this was something they actually offered.  

 

Do you have any registered disabilities you made Sky aware of, during the process of signing up with them ?  Just checking to see whether Sky would have had any additional responsibilities, if this was relevant.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou both for your replies.  I won't multi-quote because that's just stupid :)

 

@BankFodder After some thought, I think i'd like them, ideally, to replace the LNB with the Hybrid one free of charge.   I wasn't given this opportunity at the point of installation so I think it's probably the least they can do.   It's something I plan to talk to them about tomorrow.

 

@unclebulgaria67 The extent of my conversation with the Sky engineer went something like this ..

 

Engineer: "Do you want a new dish?"

Me: "Yes please"

 

The dish I had was nearly ten years old so I was only too happy to have it replaced with a new one.   At the time, I was quite happy to get Q because it looked like a decent bit of kit and I was interested to see what features it had, so there were no real requirements to speak of.   I'm not disabled, but I do have some long term medical issues, but they wouldn't really affect a dish installation.

 

I also think, at the time, it was probably a fairly reasonable assumption to make that, basically, a dish is just a dish.   A lot of people have told me I should have asked for a Hybrid LNB when it was installed, but how could I ask a question I didn't even know i had to ask ?

 

I think if i don't get any joy with Sky tomorrow then i'll raise a formal complaint with them and look at contacting the ombudsman as well.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interestingly, I've also been told just a few hours ago that the "core TV" services of Sky Q cannot be "terminated with penalty" - basically that you cannot pay an early termination fee and exit the contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou.   It appears the user in question didn't actually "cancel" their contract, it seems like it just expired and the box became a freesat box.

 

Sky have agreed to send an engineer next monday to install the Hybrid LNB free of charge and the person I spoke to said it would be an idea to try rhe card in my old box to see if it works, which I will.   I'm not expecting it to, but it's worth a try.

 

Under the circumstances, the LNB being replaced really is the best I can hope for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the old card will work fine

infact any skycard will work in any old hd+ skybox just for freeview.

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I ideally don't want it just for freeview/freesat though.   I'd like to put the Sky Q card into the old Sky+ HD box and continue getting all of the premium channels i'm paying for.   I think that's where the problem will arise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ClemFandango said:

Sky have agreed to send an engineer next monday to install the Hybrid LNB free of charge and the person I spoke to said it would be an idea to try rhe card in my old box to see if it works, which I will.   I'm not expecting it to, but it's worth a try.

 

Under the circumstances, the LNB being replaced really is the best I can hope for.

 

I agree. They are putting you back in the position you'd have been if they'd said what they should have ( "We can upgrade you to Sky Q. You'll need a new dish to use Q. If you want to revert to the non-Q system in future it'd need to be a 'hybrid' dish that supports both".)

 

I don't think you can realistically expect more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...