Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court trial Friend caught doing 38mph in a 30mph zone - has already done speed awareness course?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1382 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Friend of mine is a taxi driver and was caught doing 38mph in a 30mph zone.

He received the NIP and wrote his details on there and agreed with the charge and therefore got given a speed awareness course to do.

He has sat and done his speed awareness course on a computer with webcam and microphone and has references for it too.

 

However he then received a letter stating he needs to go to court and not only for speeding but also for failing to identify driver!

He already said he was guilty for speeding and had sent the letter oFf and then done the test as well afterwards

 

how can they now take him to court for it?

I now have the form to fill where I have to write guilty or not guilty for speeding as well as for failing to identify driver.

Of course I cant just ignore the letter therefore what am I supposed to do?

 

Do I fill the letter again and say im guilty for speeding and not guilty for failing to provide driver details?

He doesnt want to get charged and accused twice when he's already done the speed awareness course.

 

Thanks in advance. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your post is a bit confusing - sometimes you say "he", sometimes you say "I".

 

I suspect the most likely explanation is that your friend (or you) has actually been caught speeding twice, but that only the first NIP/s172 request to name driver was received by him (or you) and the second one has gone astray in the post.  This letter that has been received is probably a Single Justice Procedure notice asking how you plead to both charges relating to the second offence. 

 

Are you absolutely certain that this letter asking for a plea relates to the same speeding offence for which a course was already sat, and not a second speeding offence for which the notice has gone astray?  If you are certain it relates to the offence for which a course has already been done, I'd contact the police and tell them, and get them to confirm in writing that both charges will be dropped.  (If it's not obvious to you whether it's the same charge, I'd ring them and ask).

 

If, as I think is more likely, this is a second speeding offence that he (you) knew nothing about, I believe the usual advice is to plead not guilty to both charges and then in court on the day you approach the prosecutor and offer to plead guilty to speeding if (and only if) they drop the failure to name the driver charge.  There's another poster called Man in the Middle who can explain this better than me - hopefully he'll be along later to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its "he".

I keep writing he or I as when I normally write posts I write for myself and always write I

therefore now that im writing for someone else, its all a bit confusing as I keep writing he or I at times.

It is definitely a He not I so please ignore that.

 

As for the speeding offence, it is definitely for the same offense not 2 separate offences.

The exact same speed measurement and same road on the letter.

 

I doubt he was doing 38 mph in BOTH speeding offenses.

I think what has happened is the speed awareness course was originally booked for an earlier date however because of corona he received another email where the dates had been forwarded 1 month and the reason being something to do with the virus.

 

Maybe because of that things are delayed and therefore Cambridge constabulary assumed my friend didn't respond on time?

Thats what im guessing?

 

Just dont know if now he should write guilty or not guilty because yes he was guilty for speeding

however hes paid the price for it therefore why should he be charged twice for it? 

 

1 mistake he did make was the NIP notice he sent back,

he didnt send it TRACKED DELIVERY,

he sent it 1st 2nd class post without signature therefore he cant prove that they had received the letter.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can he not directly contact the clarke of the court with proof and explain this to them, and ask them what to do, as it seems to merely be an admin error?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who has written this letter?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spoke to him on the phone,

He said the first letter came which was the NIP.

 

He wrote his name on there and sent the letter off 1st class.

He then received a 2nd letter asking him if he wants points on the licence or if he wants to do the speed awareness course.

 

He chose to do the speed awareness course and he wrote his debit card details on there

so they charged him the amount for the speed awareness course and sent him the booked date for his course by email.

He has prove for the payment being taken out as well as that he sat the course and completed it.

 

Assuming everything was finished now he then now has received a Single Justice Procedure notice.

Which states he was caught speeding as well as failing to identify the driver.

Now he's lost as he has already done the course and paid the fees therefore why hes receiving this letter/form he doesnt understand. 

 

Surely they wouldn't provide him with an option of speed awareness course or points on license if they hadnt received his NIP surely? Assuming they sent him the speed awareness course should mean they received the NIP stating he was the driver?

So how can he now be accused of not identifying the driver? 

 

This justice procedure notice was given by Cambridgeshire constabulary by the tiny blurred out logo I can see on the form.

 

He says he has contacted Cambridgeshire constabulary and they told him to send any proof of evidence as well as the form and in writing .

 

..write a letter stating your sorry they didn't receive the NIP

however he did send it and he has done the speed awareness course

(Showing proof of it) and then let the court decide on it after?

 

Is this what he should do?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, hassy786 said:

he then now has received a Single Justice Procedure notice.

 

contact the court that has sent the above and tell them he has already completed the course etc etc.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I suggest it might be very unwise for either you or him simply to assume that there can't be two separate speeding offences on the same road at the same speed?  (In fact it might be quite likely).

He simply needs to ring up and check whether one offence or two. 

If only one offence tell them he's already done the course and ask for written confirmation that the charges will be dropped. 

If it's a second offence, do as I said before - plead not guilty to both and then on the day in court offer a plea bargain to plead guilty to the speeding if, but only if, they agree to drop the failure to identify the driver.

Nobody here can definitely tell your friend what to do until he finds out what is happening himself, as no-one here knows.

If I were him, I would telephone the police (as it is probably they who are prosecuting him) and ask them what is going on. 

If there is only one speeding offence and it's the one he's already done a course for, he tells them that and provides whatever evidence they ask for. 

He then asks them to confirm in writing that the second set of charges will be dropped. 

If it relates to a second speeding charge (and it might) then he pleads not guilty to both and does a plea bargain as outlined above on the day in court.

It might also be a good idea to contact the Clerk of the court as well.  (Belt and braces together never fails).

A second thought has just struck me. 

Your friend was definitely offered a course originally, and not a conditional offer of a fixed penalty? 

If it was a conditional offer, not only must he pay the penalty, he also has to send away his licence.

  If he did not do that, they will refund his penalty and he'll be asked to plead.

[It is very difficult to help people out third hand. 

Can't your friend post himself?

  If English is not this first language, can somebody help him 'phoning the police if he does not fully understand the questions and answers?

  It's very difficult doing this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turns out you guys where right... This is 2 separate speeding fines.

The one he received he done the awareness course for but the 2nd one he did not receive the NIP for.

 

So considering he does not know anything about it other than the single procedure notice he will write not guilty for speeding and failing to identify driver and then in court he will agree to the speeding only if they drop the charges for failing to identify driver.. is that correct?

 

He is telling me to write a letter for him apologising for not identifying the driver as he didn't receive the letter and to also write that he is guilty of speeding on the letter but he wont take the blame for not identifying driver as he did not receive the letter.... 

 

Would it not be better if he said hes guilty for the speeding and doesn't need to come to court for it and then write not guilty for failing to identify driver come to court?

 

That way hes owned up to his mistake for speeding and will occur penalty points which he said is fine and then as for failing to identify driver he will go to court and explain he did not receive the NIP therefore was not able to write his name on it....

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

follow your previous thread and maninthemiddles advice...same applies here too..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, hassy786 said:

He is telling me to write a letter for him apologising for not identifying the driver as he didn't receive the letter and to also write that he is guilty of speeding on the letter but he wont take the blame for not identifying driver as he did not receive the letter.... 

 

Do not do that! It's a possible route to nine points. 

 

As above, attending court and doing the "deal" is the only realistic route out of this.

I have heard that in some areas they are accepting the deal by letter but you cannot rely on it everywhere.

 

The problem is that at present they cannot prove who the driver was and so cannot succeed with a speeding allegation.

But as soon as a guilty plea is entered to that charge no evidence is needed and a conviction will follow.

That then leaves the defendant to defend the "Failing to provide driver's details" charge with no bargaining tools.

 

It is not easy to defend that charge.

Simply turning up to say "I didn't receive the letter" will not do (otherwise everybody would do it).

The defendant will have to prove to the court's satisfaction that he did not and it is very difficult to prove that something did not happen.

 

The deal cannot normally be handled by a "Single Justice" (SJ).

They sit with a Legal Advisor and deal with guilty pleas "on paper."

There is no prosecutor present and the SJ does not have the authority to drop charges (which is what's required.

 

Your friend should plead Not Guilty to both charges, attend court and offer to do the deal.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thata great thank you very much for the advice! Its good to know we can come to you for advice. :)

Now I only have left to sort out the issue where my brother was caught speeding in a car registered to me..

I sent the NIP in his name unfortunately 1st class so not signed for or tracked and have not received a reply.

Dont want to end up in court too for failing to identify driver which sounds to me like it might happen as I haven't received a reply yet. Its been about 3/4 weeks since I sent the letter of 1st class.

Thank you for all the help!!

One question..

Surely instead of him proving to them he didn't receive a letter..

They should be proving to him that they sent the letter?

Don't they send the letters of first class posted or anything therefore to show proof it was sent to the address rather than a "mistake in the office"?

They must have proof of this to show him but if they don't then surely they cant accuse him of failing to identify driver?

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Nope meaning?

Because im also thinking about my situation where my brother was caught speeding with a car in my name which I sold to him but didn't bother to change the registered keeper as would save adding a new keeper on the car especially we live in the same house anyway.

 

Then I received a letter  for speeding which was him and sent the NIP in his name unfortunately not recorded delivery! (My mistake) now im waiting on the next step

 

however I don't want them to accuse me of failing to identify the driver as well because then it would be a sticky situation where I would have to prove I sent the letter off which I wont be able to do... Therefore I was thinking to get out of it... Instead of saying I sent the letter off.. I can say I didn't get the letter in the first place to send off and if they have proof to show me they sent the letter to my address in the first place?

 

End of the day anyone can say they sent the letter but if there's no proof then possibly I can get away with saying I haven't received it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

post is deemed to be received 2 days 1st class.... 5 days 2nd class.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And can they prove to me they sent the NIP to me? 

 

Im guessing they should have received my NIP by now but I cant really call them to ask as then they will have it on record that I called up and confirmed I sent a reply back to them :D which will in a way give them proof they sent a NIP out to me and I received it

 

therefore which then leaves me having to prove I didnt receive he NIP?

 

Guess I will just have to wait and wait until my brother gets a letter or I receive another letter from them....

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just type stop hitting quote

we know what we've said...

 

i'm not sure what part of MITM's advice, repeated above recently, and first explained to you last november on your other thread link above is not sinking in......

 

Quote

Simply turning up to say "I didn't receive the letter" will not do (otherwise everybody would do it).

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are not getting what im asking.

As much as they can ask me to prove I sent the NIP out.

The same I can ask them to prove they sent the NIP out to me.

Letters can easily be lost in the post especially with corona virus and royal mail delays therefore it cant be my fault the letter didnt get to me can it?

Its their word against mine therefore surely they cant accuse you for something they dont have proof of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will almost certainly be able to prove the letter was posted and that's all they have to do. It is deemed "served" on the recipient two working days later (it must be sent by 1st class post) whether it gets there or not. This is contained in legislation (Interpretation Act, 1978, S7). If it is alleged it was not served then the recipient has to prove that it was not (hence my warning about it being  hard to prove that something did not happen).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay thats perfect thats what I wanted to know. I will just ring them up next few days and ask if they have received my reply yet or not. Not much else i can do

Thank you very much.

Good news. I just asked my brother if he got any letters regarding the speeding and he said yes he received the NIP and hes written his name on there and sent it off now so I should be in the clear now.

Hope my friend will get his situation sorted now.

Thank you for all your help guys!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Court trial Friend caught doing 38mph in a 30mph zone - has already done speed awareness course?
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...