Jump to content


2010 Lloyds tsb CCJ sold to asset link 2016


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 323 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Original ruling 37.50 per month but only paid £2.50 since 2014 .

Asset bought this ccj and I received the relevant paperwork, but nothing from the court.

 

Now 10 years old and have a balance of 18k.

Should I continue to pay it ,

I have also offered £500 as a final settlement, which was rejected.

Is this really worth paying anymore?

thanks for your replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

who was the org claimant Lloyds via sCM?

 

what was the debt an OD balance?

and how much?

 

so you negotiated a reduced PCM with whom?

 

dx

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Original claimant Lloyds TSB via SCM Solicitors.

Made a formal agreement with them to alter payment after 4 years .

They did advise to contact court and use I think N245 form to change payment.

But I never did!

 

It was a credit card debt with an original limit of 22k.

Thankyou.

 

When asset bought this debt they tried to get me to pay the original ruling of £37.50 I blatantly said no.

In fact when they bought it I said no I'm not paying you anything as your not the original claimant.

 

But after a year I gave in to their phone calls and started paying the £2.50 to them.

I am presently registered disabled which they know and even tried to say that there must be money left over from my benefits to pay them more.

I don't think so!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

shame you gave in to their nuisance phonecalls.

you should never discuss debt on the phone with anyone

least of all a totally powerless DCA.

 

pers i'd p'haps cease all payments now

there is very little anyone can do to enforce a 10yrs old CCJ now in all reality.

and

 

did you really run up £22k debt? I bet not

if you were to send Lloyds an sar you might be lucky and get all the statements.

was there any kind of dispute regarding the balance?

 

it seems to me Lloyds sold it on as they knew there were issues as they let you negotiate a £PCM

did you contest the CCJ?

or was it a default judgement you knew nothing about?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, London1971 said:

Are you living entirely on benefits?

Yes...but my wife does work.

 

Thanks DX

my only fear if I stopped paying would be they tried to enforce the ccj,if they are allowed to.

.I own my own home.

 

Normal charges on account plus court fees etc.

I never disputed the claim as I was still trying to keep a roof over our head and a business afloat due to illness.

 

I know you said after 10 years it's harder to enforce but I have been paying it, so I cannot really go for it being statue barred.

Also it seems strange they didn't accept my offer if they thought they could get more.

They're  a pain...

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you defend the original court claim or head in sand?

 

tell us the history of the court claim..

 

you wife being in work is nothing to do with them!!

nor is her income, ruddy fleecers!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Andyorch changed the title to 2010 Lloyds tsb CCJ sold to asset link 2016
1 hour ago, London1971 said:

Are you living entirely on benefits?

I concur,

 

just stop paying them. They’d have to go back to court to enforce any CCJ older than 6 years old. In that incredibly unlikely event they will be on very shaky ground trying to extract money from someone registered disabled on benefits.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Court claim .

Normal krap..tried to get higher amount but changed it through redetermination.Never contested claim, done through SCM solicitors.

So yes...head in sand!

 

1 hour ago, London1971 said:

I concur,

 

just stop paying them. They’d have to go back to court to enforce any CCJ older than 6 years old. In that incredibly unlikely event they will be on very shaky ground trying to extract money from someone registered disabled on benefits.

 

But surely me paying them at token amount is still acknowledging debt,so it can still be enforced?

thank you for your post

Link to post
Share on other sites

so it was a default judgement in the 1st place by Lloyds.

 

and you DID us a n245 and were successful and the £PCM sum was reduced legally by the court to £37.50PCM?

 

please don't gloss over important details..

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under the Limitations Act 1980, Section 24 provides a period of six years for the enforcement of a judgment from the time that it becomes enforceable.

 

The Act reads:-

24.-(1) An action shall not be brought upon any judgment after the expiration of six years from the date on which the, judgment became enforceable.
(2) No arrears of interest in respect of any judgment debt shall be recovered after the expiration of six years from the date on which the interest became due.

 

Andy

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No ... the above is in connection to executing the judgment (Enforcing)...its irrelevant whether you paid or acknowledged the Judgment within 6 years.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

you're saying that even though I have been paying it up to now

,after the 6 years from judgement they would have to apply now to the court.

Which will be unlikely to give permission?

 

thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

County Court Judgments are not and cannot be statue barred...the limitation ceased on the issuance of the court claim. Limitation stated above is with regards to the judgment claimant not executing within 6 years.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

they, link, who were not the judgement claimant would have to apply to the court to enforce the CCJ. now if the court would allow that after 6yrs from judgement is very debatable.

 

you've been had from day one they got their hands on it,

which is the std MO for link, they LIE through their teeth to extort money out of people.

but as you didn't come here and ask , you got had by talking to link on the phone

 

perss i'd be stopping payments.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When Link open their mouth they lie. They threatened me with their non existent fraud department once!

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...