Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

travelling distance for work


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1407 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello

my employer has advised me that i am in consultation for potential redundancy

as from the 1st June 2020

 

i have been to a second meeting on 15th June 2020 where he advised me that there was suitable employment available at another 2 sites

 

both sites are at least a 2 hour journey both ways i do not drive so will have to use public transport

this involves bus then train then bus again

 

both sites are more than 60 miles travel for me both ways would this be considered as unreasonable

would i still be entitled to my redundancy if i refused these offers

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.acas.org.uk/your-rights-during-redundancy/taking-another-job-with-your-employer
 

Some good information in the above link. Takeaway is that commute time can have a bearing on if it is a reasonable alternative or not.

 

Its worth being honest and just telling your employer that it’s an impossible commute. What other alternatives are there.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/work/leaving-a-job/redundancy/your-employer-offers-you-another-job/
 

This above is actually better. Have a good read through it. All needs to be done in writing anyway, don’t agree to anything verbally.

 

It’s also possible they are doing it to try and get out of paying you redundancy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you give us a little more info on the 2 other job possibilites? Are they working under the same management team for example, ie if the employer divides its sites into areas or regiosn do they fall in the same area?

What is the job function, woudl you ber expected to travel as part of the rle, ie if you are an area manager nd have to visit several locations then asking you to move  would be more acceptable than asking someone who does shop floor work in a single branch.

Are they willing to pay your relocation expenses? (would you like a new house?). You could suggest this before you say no as that will put them on the back foot should they still want to claim you "resigned"

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is going back about 18 years ago and was in the NHS.  My employer wanted to redeploy me from a base in Norwich to Cambridge.  (about 80 miles each way; 90 - 120 minutes journey time and I'd have had to use public transport).

 

I successfully argued that this was not a suitable alternative and got redundancy.

 

Whether this would still be the case or not, and whether it was an easier argument to make in the public sector rather than the private sector, I don't know.  But that's what happened to me.

 

(I was also fortunate in that I was snapped up by another NHS trust within my notice period - obviously didn't get a payout but kept a job).

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply

the jobs are based in Scotland region of a major building company

i am based in Glasgow

one of the jobs is based outside Stirling

the other is based outside Edinburgh

the job is site labourer

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm no expert and in fact I was surprised they accepted my argument.  Everybody else told me I had no chance.

 

Don't rely on me and don't get your hopes up, but it might well be that the jobs they are offering you are "suitable employment".  But I think the question should be whether they are "suitable alternative employment".

 

I would argue that the offer of a job two hours away and 60 miles away is not a suitable alternative job for a site labourer - even more so if you don't drive and have to rely on public transport.  But other people may think it's a perfectly reasonable offer - although they may be getting paid more than a labourer.

 

Don't suppose you're in a union?

 

See what others say.  I think I was probably lucky to get away without having to commute to Cambridge.  You may not be so lucky.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly they wont be wanting to buy you a new house so you need to dress up your questions during this consultation period to make it look like you would be interested in relocating if they can meet your request or maybe put on a minibus to collect you and drop you home instead.

You need to be getting everything down in writing and ask aboout someone else sitting in on the interviews to take notes that both parties the signoff as being a true and accurate record of the meeting.

this may well make them drop the nonsense about resigning and pay you the redundancy rather then risk an Employmet tribunal hearing where they will most likely get the same outcome but have a shedload of costs  added for their recklessness.

They hope that you are willing to just skulk off so you might get an offer of statutory redundancy on the promise you dotn discuss this with anyone else. they cant stipulate that but also consider the delay in getting what is due if you fight everyone else's batlle as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps you can tell them that you are recording the interview on your

phone, because it’s better than taking notes.

 

Do they know that you don’t drive and would need to take public transport 60 miles?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...