Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you first address / name confirmed for me ..   He reads everything we post on this site 
    • Well send off the letter of claim when you're ready. There's really no need to hang around. In terms of the particulars of claim – you don't need to send anything extra. Do not click any boxes.   I wasn't aware that you actually had to calculate the daily rate of interest. I'm giving a shout to my site team colleague @Andyorch
    • By the way, is there a telephone number for the mystery handset? Have you tried calling it?
    • Who made the complaint to the ICO? Did we recommend it? An uncharitable side of me wonders whether they aren't considering erasing all data in order to get rid of evidence of their bungling. Have you checked your credit file? I think you need to make sure the get copies of everything you can from anywhere just in case various records get cleaned up. I think should set about that straightaway although it's a nuisance. Keep a note of the time you spend doing it. Are you sure that the problems with Vodafone and also with Three were caused by your blighted credit file – blighted by virgin? Can we take it that your credit file before this was clear? I think it could be an idea to send an SAR to Vodafone and also to Three to see if they have any reference to the problem setting up your account with them and that those problems might have been caused by virgin. Your credit file also might show searches by Vodafone and also by Three. If there's anything else you can think of – then try to get the information.  
    • No they are not entitled to see payslips. Only if this ever went to Court and it was part of the Court process would this be required. So the information you provide needs to be accurate, in the remote possibility that your information is passed to a DCA who uses it in Court in the future.   Just enter all information onto your income/expenses sheet in Pounds Sterling.        
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Packlink/Hermes lost ebay parcel - **Settled**


Recommended Posts

As a private seller on ebay, I sold a premium perfume for £320 using Hermes through Packlink which they then subsequently lost in transit. I didn't take out extra insurance since I had no issues with posting similar sold bottles of it previously.

 

I had to go through the stress of trying to speak to someone and waiting hours on Packlink's webchat. I also had to refund the buyer since they never received the item.

 

After weeks of investigating with Hermes, Packlink eventually declared the item lost and sent me a claim form hoping they would maybe refund me. After I sent the completed form they came back and said that alcohol based items are on their prohibited list (which I had no idea about since I see so many perfumes sold on ebay) and so I cannot make any claim at all and so I stand to lose my money.

 

I spoke with ebay but they declared they have no affiliation with Packlink and Hermes also didn't want to hear anything of it and said I had to deal with Packlink. I thought ebay would take some responsibility since they advertise Packlink on their site and provides greater convenience for sellers. They should also inform me I cannot post the item being on some prohibited list.

 

I have used the resolver site to open cases against Packlink and Hermer but don't think that is going anywhere. I have read elsewhere on similar instances in this forum that users should open a small claims case against Hermes.

 

Is that be something I should consider or the fact that the item is supposedly prohibited and I did not pay for extra insurance it would not be a good idea?

Edited by slick132
Use paragraph spacing when posting please. Post edited accordingly
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Sorry I was away so wasn't able to mention here but I have received an Acknowledgement of service and they have chosen to defend all of the claim. They have now have 28 days to file a response.

I think that now you have had a pretty clear explanation of the mediation process and in particular, the apparent approach by the mediator, you are in an excellent position to press your case home.

Good.....so now your waiting on the n157 Notice of Allocation..this allocates the claim to track and gives you the courts directions on what you and the defendant must prepare next and by when.It will

Welcome to the forum. We get lots of Hermes cases here – and you should read around and you will see the stories. We will be pleased to help you.

However, you have posted your story in a solid block of text and that makes it very difficult for people to follow and to give you the kind of support that you would otherwise get.

Please will you make sure that you post your comments well spaced and well punctuated so that it is easy for people to read.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can start here:-

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/06/2020 at 13:58, BankFodder said:

Welcome to the forum. We get lots of Hermes cases here – and you should read around and you will see the stories. We will be pleased to help you.

However, you have posted your story in a solid block of text and that makes it very difficult for people to follow and to give you the kind of support that you would otherwise get.

Please will you make sure that you post your comments well spaced and well punctuated so that it is easy for people to read.

 

Sure, will do!

 

On 12/06/2020 at 14:01, BankFodder said:

You can start here:-

 

 

 

Thanks this is very useful. I did go through Resolver to raise a case against Hermes. They said this:

 

Quote

 

"Dear XXX,

 
Thanks for getting in touch with us about parcel number XXX
 
We’re so sorry that there’s been a delay to your delivery; we can see that there hasn’t been an update on your parcel since 18/05/2020. The last tracked point was at the ParcelShop please contact your reseller and inform them of your query so that they can contact the appropriate team at Hermes and chase the delivery.
 
Your reseller likes to ensure their customers have the most efficient resolution when there is a delay in your parcel’s movement so I would advise that you make contact with them and they will be able to help you get this resolved.
 
We understand, however your reseller has their own policies to follow for these scenarios. This is why you’re best speaking directly with them so they can make any further arrangements they feel necessary which may include a replacement or a refund.
 
Kind Regards,
 
XXX
Customer Service Advisor
Hermes Customer Services"

 

 
 
 
So effectively they pushed me towards Packlink. Packlink last said to me:
 
Quote

"Dear XXX,

We apologise for the inconvenience caused by the carrier.

Unfortunately, our terms and conditions are very clear regarding prohibited items.

Also, the item was not fully insured.

Im Afraid there is no appeal process at this point.

Best regards."

 

 

 

 

So from your advice I take it that I should try to claim compensation from Hermes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well presumably you have read enough to understand that it is our view that it is not the customer who should insure against Hermes and poor handling of the goods which are placed in their care. It is Hermes themselves who should insure against their own inadequacy.
Our view is that once you have paid the price that they have asked to transport your goods, then with that comes an obligation to deliver them safely and not to lose them.

It seems grossly unfair that they could effectively have a clause in the contract which says that we undertake to deliver your goods – but if we fail then we are not liable.

So that's the first part.

The second part – as you should understand by now – is that they say that you are not covered for the loss of your goods because there was some element of alcohol contained in them – it was perfume.

 

It is inconceivable that the contents of your parcel had any effect on the risk of their loss. Clearly the loss was caused by Hermes own negligent handling of your goods and the fact that the perfume contain alcohol could not possibly have affected this.
Presumably the perfume was encased in a glass bottle – so it's quite amazing that they didn't say that glass was on the list of prohibited items – and maybe they will bring that one up later.

Generally speaking for low value items we find that Hermes put up their hands and pay out. There must be some threshold at which they decide that they won't pay out and that they will take it to court. We don't know what that threshold is.
£320 is not a huge amount it might be enough to cause Hermes to take you into court and to get a judgement.

Of course if you won – then Hermes would have a great deal of difficulty because first of all the game would be up as far as their "prohibited items list" was concerned. And it would also be up as far as the necessity for their customers to take out insurance against Hermes own carelessness.
So these two elements add considerably to Hermes risk factor. They stand the possibility of losing £320 plus costs – plus their contractual terms exposed as unenforceable.

On the other hand they may be so confident that they decide to take it to court – not so much for the £320 – but to get a judgement in their favour which confirms the enforceability of the terms and conditions.

I'm afraid that it is you who has to make the choice.

You certainly aren't going to get anything back if you don't. Don't imagine that simply firing off a warning to Hermes and even a threat of legal action giving them 14 days will produce any result.

They will test you all the way. So if you issue the claim, you will have to factor in the cost of the claim – which might be about 50 quid you have to check it out. If they then decide to go court then you will have to factor in the allocation fee which will be about £80.
At each step you will be showing to Hermes that you are serious and you are prepared to spend the money. At each step Hermes will take you more seriously and realise that this one might go the distance – and at some point they will have to decide whether to get their lawyers involved and to attend the court and to make the arguments and hope to win – but possibly they could lose.

The cost of losing to Hermes in the value of your case is negligible – even if they spend several thousands on their lawyers. However the cost of losing in terms of a judgement against them where a judge expresses the view that there terms are unenforceable – would be very significant, for Hermes and also for the entire courier industry.

So I hope I've explained it all to you. You won't get your money back if you don't issue the court claim and you may well have to take them to court.

If you decide to claim then you need to send them a letter of claim giving them 14 days or else you will sue them. Don't send this letter unless you really mean to go through with it. Don't bluff because you will lose credibility.
If you decide to make a claim then look through this forum about how to bring a small claim in the County Court. It's very easy – but it is better to be aware of the steps in advance so that you will have more confidence. You will need to register with the court service Moneyclaim website and open an account there in order to issue the papers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incidentally, what did Resolver say? We get lots of people saying that they are going to Resolver about problems – but we never hear about any outcome.

Also, I'm afraid that I'm going to dissolution you as to a few things.

Companies like Packlink are simply a sort of broker. They make their money by doing the absolute minimum. They put you in contact with the company which is meant to do the real work. They have no interest after they have clinched the deal. They take their commission and that's it.
There's no reason why they should invest any more in some kind of customer service operation. The easier that they make it for you to reach somebody to make your complaint, the more money it costs them. I'm sure that they predicate their customer service function to a great extent on the fact that if they make it difficult and more people give up and they will be less troubled.

So you had to go through the hoop of waiting a long time on the telephone – to make your complaint. Then they spent weeks apparently investigating – and then eventually came back to you with a claim form.

Hurdles, hurdles, hurdles.
I wonder what percentage of complainants drop out by this stage?

You spoke with eBay – who of course distance himself from the whole thing. You thought the eBay would take some responsibility because they advertise Packlink – Bless!
You don't seem to realise that you have been encouraged into a multilayered service where you are effectively in a maze and everybody is able to decline responsibility because the problem is always somebody else's.

EBay told you that you had to deal with Packlink. Packlink is in Spain so if you really wanted to attack them, you would have a lot of difficulty because they are out of the jurisdiction. Coincidence…?
Hurdles, hurdles, hurdles.

EBay have told you that they have no affiliation with Packlink – but I'll bet you that they are pretty closely involved – and I'll bet you that eBay find it extremely convenient to have the extra layer available with which to frustrate people whose parcel delivery has gone wrong.


An irrelevant prohibited items list – hurdles, hurdles, hurdles. I wonder what percentage of people take the "prohibited items" list at face value when their property is lost and drop out at that stage.

He then opened a case with Resolver. Of course Resolver is independent – but I'm afraid I have a strong sense that Resolver is pretty limp wristed and certainly is not sufficiently aggressive or assertive enough to do anything other than to attempt some kind of negotiation and basically feedback to you what Hermes said.
The problem is that people who go to Resolver, tend to feel that they've gone to an authoritative source of help and that whatever Resolver says, is the end of the matter. I'm afraid that I think that an organisation like Resolver, although it probably produces some good results, where there is a tricky situation, then they simply tend to perpetuate the status quo – and the status quo with the courier industry is that you need to get insurance and you need to make sure your items aren't on the prohibited items list – regardless of what has happened.

At the end, you should avoid these brokers. You should make your own arrangements and deal with courier companies directly. They were still trying to wriggle out of their proper obligations by saying that you need some kind of insurance or saying that your items on the prohibited list – but at least you know exactly who you are dealing with and you won't be led round by the nose – as you have been so far.

Finally, you should avoid Hermes at all costs. Although they have many satisfied customers – they have a huge problem both with their couriers and with their so-called customer support.

There are several Hermes complaints groups on Facebook. Here is one https://www.facebook.com/groups/hermessuck which has about 10,500 members at the moment. A week ago there was barely 9000.

That shows you the extent of the problem – but the sad thing is that as far as I can make out most of the people on this Facebook group and others are not achieving any resolution. There simply spending their time asking each other what is the best telephone number to call and how can they avoid waiting is too long et cetera blah blah.

Hermes is well aware of these groups and is probably very comfortable with the fact that they exist because those people are all corralled together not getting anywhere and not making trouble at the open.

Of course what is really needed is a revolution of these 10,000 people ought to start bringing their own legal actions – but of course like most reasonable people, they want to lead their lives quietly and legitimately – and pay their money for a service – and in return get the service that they paid for. It seems that it doesn't happen all the time with Hermes.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've suddenly realised that maybe Hermes attempt to decline liability or to restrict your right of action in respect of items which are on a "prohibited goods" list – or because you haven't bought an "insurance" is contrary to statute law.

If I'm right on this then this is the killer argument.
 

it seems to me that section 49 – Consumer Rights Act requires a service to be carried out with reasonable care and skill. No issues there.

Then section 57 Consumer Rights Act Specifically says

 

Quote

1 A term of a contract to supply services is not binding on the consumer to the extent that it would exclude the trader’s liability arising under section 49 (service to be performed with reasonable care and skill).

 

Which to my mind addresses precisely what Hermes and the other courier companies are trying to do.

I haven't had a lot of time to look through the rest of the part of the Act dealing with supply of services – and it may be that somewhere in there is something which excludes the kind of behaviour that you are getting from the courier companies – but somehow I doubt it.

If I'm right, then if you were to take this to court, your chances of success would rise from about 80% too much better than 95%

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a slightly closer look at the provision of services sections in the Consumer Rights Act together with the section on unfair terms and also appendix 2 which gives a nonexhaustive list of examples of unfair terms – and I see nothing to change my opinion that Hermes and all the other courier companies are acting in breach of these statutory requirements.

I would suggest that you go for it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your assistance!

 

Just to check, it is Packlink who refused my claim for loss.

 

My only contact with Hermes has been through Resolver (their reply above). It's impossible to speak to someone over the phone, the only method of contact with Hermer I can see is through their automated chatbot 'Holly'. I still have 12 days before I can escalate the case to Customer Relations.

 

I take on board what you have stated and from what you have mentioned on the Consumer Rights Act I am prepared to go through the court route. Should I wait to escalate the case first and try to make a claim against Hermes through Resolver?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget Resolver.

 

Begin the claim through Hermes using the normal complaints mechanism and then when they come back to you having refused your claim then come back here and we will help you begin a legal action.

Meanwhile you should look through this website to find out more about bringing a small claim in the county court. It's very easy but it is worth while knowing the steps in advance because this will give you more confidence

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

OK I have tried Hermes but not able to get anywhere with them. I can only raise it to them through their chat system and they came back saying I need to deal with the reseller i.e. Packlink.

 

I am just waiting on ebay in the meantime - I raised the issue with them on the weekend and they have sent a 'white glove' request for a refund and I should hear back in 7-10 working days. I don't think that will go through successfully so if that fails then I will proceed with making a small claim against Hermes. Would appreciate your assistance with that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem.

Let us know what you hear and then we will go through it all and help you produce a letter of claim and also a draft particulars of claim.

In the meantime please read up about how to bring a small claim in the County Court. We have lots of information on this site. It's very easy but you need to know the steps.

Register on the court service Moneyclaim online website and have a look round and get used to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks I will definitely read up on that. Will get back to you here once ebay confirm.

 

I just read about the others who have had a similar experience with even more expensive items! (guitar and digital camera)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you are just insignificant small fry – but Hermes will still spend far more than the compensation is worth to avoid their responsibilities. Just watch

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

So after all this time waiting on ebay, they have denied my request for a payout so I would like to go ahead with the court claim against Hermes.

 

From what I gather reading around here is that I need to send them a letter of claim and then make the claim 14 days later, is that correct?

Is there a draft letter I can use?

 

I have registered with the mcol website.

Sorry if being naive,

where does the particulars of the claim come into play?

Link to post
Share on other sites

plenty of examples here already 

just read a few threads in this forum you are in 

or use our search top right.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You send them a letter of claim giving them 14 days or else you will issue the court papers. If you are not hundred percent certain you are going to do this then don't bother to send the letter. Don't bluff because Hermes will ignore you anyway and you will lose credibility.

Once you have sent the letter of claim then you must plan to issue the claim on day 15. This means that you start preparing your case on Moneyclaim. You can save your work as you go. After you have put in the names of the claimant and the defendant et cetera – you will be asked to put in your particulars of claim which means that you state the basis on which you are claiming compensation from Hermes. We will help you with all of this.

Firstly your letter of claim:

Quote

Dear Sir/Mdm


Hermes tracking reference number X X X X – dated X X X

Letter of claim

 

As you know, you have now reported to me that you have lost the parcel which was sent under the above tracking number.

The contents of the parcel and the value were properly declared to you. Despite this you have denied any liability for loss and therefore I writing to let you know that unless you reimburse me the value of the parcel in full and within 14 days, I shall be issuing a claim in the County Court for the full amount plus interest and without any further notice.

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

Particulars of claim

Quote

The claimant used the defendant courier company's services to send a parcel containing a bottle of perfume value of £XXX to XXXname of townxXX. The defendant has informed the claimant that they have lost the parcel. The defendant refuses to reimburse the claimant. The claimant seeks damages of £X X X plus interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts act 1984.

 

 

Once again, don't send the letter of claim unless you plan to go ahead with your threat. It's simply not worth it. However, if you don't issue the court claim then you absolutely won't get your money back.

Your chances of success if this goes to a hearing are better than 90%. Frankly the whole thing is so screamingly funny that they are trying to deny you loss on the basis of their prohibited items list – and particularly because the perfume contains alcohol, that I think that there is quite a good chance that Hermes might put their hands up rather than suffer the embarrassment – and also the very significant decision against them which would basically undermine their whole idea of denying liability for loss on the basis of their prohibited items list. This would be very serious defeat for Hermes.

Please let us know what you're going to do and also please keep us informed every step of the way.

There is a possibility that if Hermes reach out to you to settle, that they may want to do this only on condition of confidentiality. We would recommend that you do not agree to this and you should discuss it with us first – either on the forum or by contacting us directly on our admin email address.
Hermes have a lot to lose on this case. It's not only the value of the bottle of perfume but it will destroy their entire basis for denying loss on the basis of prohibited items. They routinely use this excuse as a basis for depriving their ordinary instant customers of their rights – and I think that a victory by you in the County Court here will be very significant.

Make sure that you keep close contact with this because we are going to be extremely supportive of this case

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I plan to send the letter now via email, post and through resolver. I am 100% on going through with this and will follow the necessary protocols.

 

So to confirm once I send it today, I should then issue the claim on 7th August? Should I include any further information in my claim letter as I see in the example in the other post the value of the item plus postage is mentioned? Or the fact they stated I should go through Packlink but they should be liable?

 

Appreciate your support in this matter for my case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea why you should want to send it to resolver. I'm afraid that resolver is extremely disappointing in their approach to Hermes.

Leave resolver out of it completely. It will just complicate things. They tend to take a rather half-hearted approach and they even seem to disregard the rule that as a third party you enjoy equal rights with a contracting party under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. This is really quite an amazing omission.

Simply send the letter by email and by post. Don't start involving anybody else. You will complicate your life

 

Yes, include the postage. I forgot to suggest that. Other than that, it's good enough.

Packlink are in Spain and they are unreachable because they are out of the UK jurisdiction. Sue Hermes directly and if they come back and say that you don't have any contract with them, we will deal with that. They know better and they deliberately set out to mislead their customers as to their liability. You enjoy full rights to sue on the contract under the 1999 act which I have just referred you to

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so I have sent the letter by email ([email protected]) although I got an auto-reply stating:

 

"Thank you for contacting Hermes.  This email address is no longer a Customer Service contact channel so if you have a question about a parcel, please visit https://new.myhermes.co.uk/help-and-support/contact-us.html where you can use our Digital Assistant, Holly, to log an enquiry with Customer Services or she will point you in the right direction."

 

I have also posted the letter also to Hermes UK, Capitol House,1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, LS27 OWH United Kingdom

 

This is what I stated in the letter:

Quote


RE: Letter of claim
Parcel ID: XXX


Dear Sir/Madam,

On 17th May 2020 I used your service to send a parcel. As you know, you have now reported to me that you have lost the parcel which was sent under the above tracking number.

The contents of the parcel and the value were properly declared to you. The contents of my parcel were valued at £319.99 plus the delivery fee of £2.85.

Despite this you have denied any liability for loss and therefore I am writing to let you know that unless you reimburse me the value of the parcel in full and within 14 days, I shall be issuing a claim in the County Court for the full amount plus interest and without any further notice.


Yours faithfully,
XXX

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. Looks good – although you didn't need to give them the kisses at the end because I don't think it'll make any difference but you never know, maybe you'll get something going on the side.

Of course they will ignore it all – so get ready to issue the claim on day 15.

Post the draft particulars of claim here for a last look before you click it all off on day 15

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not kisses, just hiding my name on the forum...they dont deserve my kisses 😂

 

Thanks, I will post a draft particulars here over the next few days so you can check it first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How is this for the draft particulars of claim:

 

The claimant used the courier service provided by the defendant courier company to send an item to a third party.
The defendant company has admitted that they have lost the item and yet they refuse to compensate the claimant.
The value of the item sent was £319.99. The delivery fee was £2.85.
The claimant claims full reimbursement of £322.84 (item value plus delivery fee) plus interest pursuant to section 69, County Courts Act 1984.

 

 

Should I mention that I used their services through Packlink since their reason of refusal to claim was that I should deal with Packlink?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. Don't put anything else. Let them bring that up in their defence if they want

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • BankFodder changed the title to Packlink/Hermes lost ebay parcel - **Settled**

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...