Jump to content



VCS PCN Claimform - Broomfield Developements Broomspring Close. S37XA


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

CPR 31:14  Done ready to send tomorrow.   Hi, this alleged infringement occurred in 2015, do I try and get picts in situ now or wait for their witness statement.  I have posted CPR.31.14 reg

No, no result yet,  but I would like to pay site this amount whatever the outcome, it’s here when people need it.   I think it’s a matter of principle.   Also I know CAG pain to these,

Posted Images

the letter is without prejudice so no you cant mention it and nor can they.

abuse of the court by making that threat when you have denied you owe a bean

 

If properly used a without prejudice letter is useful for entering into negotiations but that is not the intention here,

they are still asking for more money than they are lawfully entitled to even if they win so hardly  being an honest broker.

 

What you can do if you are minded to waste a stamp is to tell them that you decline their offer as there is no cause for action so the claim isnt genuine recovery of a loss and the without prejudice letter isnt a genuine attempt to enter into negotiations with a view to settle but just another feeble attempt at harassment and abuse of process.

 

That will sink the letter without trace

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Hi all. 

I just got a court date for the November 2020. 

They say in the letter the Judge wishes to deal with the matter on paper because off the current pandemic. 

 

This has thrown me, I wanted to be there to say things. 

I have to fill a form in and send it back to court, to say I agree or not,

 

N159, any advice on this will help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can insist on a hearing in person, by phone or online I think, your reason is you want to cross examine the person who wrote their WS on several points.  Also  but not given as a reason obviously is that the fleecers lies cannot be challenged if Judge is looking at paper submissions. .

 

Others will be along soon with further pooints.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

most of the recent PPC claimform threads have this already

simply read one of them.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replies,  I have looked at at forum posts, still in muddle what’s to do.  I think I will ask for a phone hearing.

 

Not been to well lately.

Edited by scotswestie
Link to post
Share on other sites

might be best to state you would rather have a face to face hearing, but most certainly object on the papers only hearing as you wish to cross examine the author of their WS.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, dx100uk.  If I request a court hearing it will drag on.  I’ve been unwell so it would not help me if this dragged on.  I think phone hearing will be best under the circumstances, thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It most likely will be a phone or online during the Coronavirus crisis. If your WS has trashed his robo POC, and he thinks he will lose he might bail and discontinue.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

In normal non-COVID times you would have a choice between a case decided on the papers, or in person.  We always says to demand a case in person, because otherwise the fleecers will send pages & pages of lies which you won't be able to challenge.  Plus it costs them to turn up, they're too stupid to deal with their own cases and so have to use solicitors, so often they give in before the court case.

 

Due to COVID it will likely be a choice between a case heard on the papers, on a phone hearing.

 

So write to the court and say you don't accept a hearing on the papers as you wish to cross examine the person that wrote the WS, as brassnecked & dx say, but say a hearing carried out over the phone or by other remote technology as the court deems fit is fine.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FTMDave, I rang court up, they were very helpful, explained I did not want paper hearing as I will need to question their particulars of claim.  I also would wish to challenge WS statement orally if I have to.  They said best thing was to hold it by telephone so I could do this.  They gave me email address so I can request telephone hearing and they will send it to the judge,

Link to post
Share on other sites

That seems ok it puts them in a spot, the last thing Simple wants is his rubbish POC and cut 'n paste WS to be challenged in a hearing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...