Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear All,   So Sorry we have been extremely busy with my work and family emergencies as my outlaws, who are in their mid and late eighties are very ill and they needed medical attention at hospitals.    Andy - Case plan is simply a sheet issued by the court to confirm who will be attending for the both parties and at what time the people will each arrive -  apparently, attendies from either side may no arrive together at the court due to Covid.   BN - The Court has not confirmed the discontinuance. A Judge at the Court has to agree to the Discontinuance but that has not yet taken place. We have 28 days to submit a stay to this notice.    FTMDave – I have always followed CAG advice since the first day I spotted the site and joined. CAG has helped me on numerous occasions. My wife did not want to drop the Counter Claim so it was essential I support her and try and talk her out of it gently.   The PCN should never have been issued in the first place because my wife’s parking area is on a private piece of land. A company leased that area of land (Call it Area A) from the main owner. The buildings in Area A is sub-let out to various tenants with Parking facilities; of which, the company my wife worked for is one such tenant.    To reach Area A, my wife has to drive through the main car park (Area B) of the main owner. It is only Area B which Claimants are authorised to police. Area A is NOT under their jurisdiction so they cannot police there. This is still the case to this day and more specifically, this is something which they are fully aware. There is an agreement between the lessors of Area A and the main owner of Area B. This owner would instruct the Claimant not to police Area A.   After the Claimant issued the PCN to my wife, the solicitors of the Lessors of Area A, issued a cease and desist order to them and notified the solicitors of the owner of Area B.. So all they had to do was to cancel the PCN. We have a copy of this letter and so we can substantiate it.   BN + FTMDave – So, there you have it. This is the explanation you wanted. They were told to stop the case and drop it.    But instead, the Claimant pursued the PCN relentlessly even after my wife pleaded with them (before the case) to stop the matter and cancel the PCN and explained the situation with copies of the cease and desist  letter.    We are following CAG’s advice and to do that we need to notify the Court  where: a.       We will apply to the court to have the Notice of Discontinuance set aside. b.       We will also apply to the court to add an additional case against the Claimants for obtaining data on my wife falsely. c.       We will also apply to the Court to add an additional Defendant to our counter claim – that being the bosses of the Claimant – the owner of Area B   After submission of these applications, along the lines suggested by CAG, we will negotiate a settlement with the Claimants   Any further advice from CAG on (b) and (c) above will be very helpful and very welcome.   Thank you BF    
    • scan up the agreement to PDF  read upload carefully please   easy peasy if you have that   dx  
    • Understood. Maybe as a first step it would be a good idea to write to Amazon and tell them that I would have selected the prepaid hermes drop-off option, like I always do, but I wasn't able to as that option wasn't available for the laptop. Additionally, after Hermes not collecting the item on two consecutive times with the Hermes home pick-up option, I was advised by a customer service assistant to organize the return myself as there is no point in choosing the home pick-up service for the third time. Following his advice and returning the laptop myself being the only available option to send it back to Amazon, I have decided to organize the return myself. I was told that I can use any of the shipping services. To quote I was told: "I could only find the pickup option. So you could arrange your own return using parcel monkey: www.parcelmonkey.com or any similar service. Keep the receipt and send it to: ...url... And we will refund you the postage fees". I didn't get any other instructions and I did what I was told by the assistant to the letter.  What else should I add? Should I mention anything else?   I understand that. I am not afraid of that, I do think that nothing protects them from having to compensate a consumer where they have failed to take reasonable care in performing the contracted service. They have a general duty of care, and they have also failed to provide the service paid for. I really hope that the judge sees it that way too. But maybe Amazon realize the mistake they made and I won't have to sue Hermes. To be honest I think it is disgusting what they do... There is no way to lose a package of 70X40X15. It is way too big. And what are the chances that they lose another package of mine that I send with the laptop at the same time? Obviously someone stole them. What else could have happened? How can they not find the driver who was responsible for the package at the time of moving it from the ParcelShop to the sorting warehouse? And if something happened to the car/driver, it must be logged somewhere. And I would like to see that log (I actually asked them to provide that in my last letter). The whole thing is just unbeliavable.
    • if other details match and this is as a result of say a marriage then yes. CCJ's are not against an address.    
    • Thanks DX and BN.   He did keep saying he’s done loads of parking cases in the past, over the 10 years he’d been doing it, so as you say he’s bound to have come across VCS stuff before isn’t he.   hopefully that’s the case then he just wants to go through it in a bit more detail. Either way you have given me a lot more confidence again now thanks.
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

SPML/LMC anyone claimed for mis selling and unfair charges?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

..both SPML/PML showing losses on the p&l account, PML would be balance sheet as well as 'trading' insolvent if it was not for the £25million share issue to Preferred Group Ltd-thought they were dead with no directors?

 

1. STILL need the 09 accounts, as Lehmans went down in Sept.08, so the accounts which will show that there is bugger all in these 2 JAWs, are the 30/11/09 due in August this year. 2 securitisations took place in 08, so this has just added to the net assets, but both made massive losses on p&l.

 

2. Both trading insolvently.

 

3. Huge intercompany debts written off, and 'going concern' special note that E&Y say the affect is unknown such that the thing could collapse at any time- no sh!t.

 

4. I stick to the contention, that these JAWs are both trading & balance sheet insolvent(OP) and if the intercompany creditors called in their debts, they would have been dust from the day Lehmans went down.

 

5. So all the accounts say they are winding down the businesses;

SPPL & LMC are are dust, and look to be wound up.

 

6. SPML & PML as Attia is keeping these alive, what are the odds the 09 accounts due, will be on time? Prosecution continues.

 

7. Keep the pressure up with CIB, they are still 'trading' insolvently and illegally conducting repos.

 

8. Well done all, we got 2 KIA and 2 WIA, follow up the blood trails, and we'll kill off SPML/PML too. Remember anyone with SPPL/LMC should now have enough from these accounts/NO directors etc., to stop any repos in court action.

 

 

 

Makaveli

KwA

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6236

 

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

 

SHUT'EM DOWN!!!!> SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL

Link to post
Share on other sites

itbg/lc

They have stated in the spml accounts they can,t even produce the accounts for their subs sppl/lmc this must render their trading position untenable alone,half this company's accounts are missing apparently presumed lost and probably deliberately.LMC showing capital of a quid,no wonder they have taken so long to produce them.

Both sppl and lmc should be immediately shut down if they refuse for any reason to produce accounts for these companies

Same applies to pml as above.

THEY CANNOT PRODUCE ACCOUNTS FOR ANY OF THEIR SUBSIDIARIES WHICH WERE NOT EVEN MENTIONED IN THE 2007 ACCOUNTS AS FAR AS I AM AWARE.

The whole lot stinks to high heaven.Preferred group own share issue and have no directors.Preferred holdings who own the group have no directors.

Its all mickey mouse stuff,

The pml accounts state that the directors of the parent preferred group have not been able to confirm that they have no current intention of payment of the debt owed in the immediate future thats cos they have no feckin directors.

So both the auditors and sole remaining director who was once a director of this same company have made a false and misleading statement,the last director having resigned on 15/10/09 their statements being made well after this date on or around 24/02/10.

 

 

Edited by ryde
Link to post
Share on other sites
Thankyou for your information supersleuth this helps to explain how this group of companies have all assisted each other by passing debt around the various entities,failing to pursue debts etc one huge tax evasion scheme.

The scandal being as the bad person and others have indicated that the two major creditors of this group storm funding and mable commercial funding both in administration and both Lehman entities have no intention in the forseeable future of calling in their loans(as reported by the auditors in the accounts),so there will be few if any assets to distribute to their own creditors who will undoubtedly include the tax authorities.

Perhaps it would be prudent to report this matter to the tax authorities who may only assess on a company by company basis and may be unaware of the whole structure,do you believe this is a possibility?

 

ANW,

 

The tax man should have enough on them to warrant an investigation of their own volition...but, there's no harm in calling them up to see if they're doing one and if not, asking them, why not.

 

The other thing I forgot to mention is when you read the accounts and they use phrases like "for accounting purposes", do not read that as being the legal position. The legal position "for legal purposes" will be entirely different to the position they take for "accounting purposes". Bear that in mind when reading the accounts.

 

Gotta dash...be back later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few more posts have been removed to the Bear garden

 

Spml/London Mortgage Company Off Topic Posts

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/249537-spml-london-mortgage-company.html

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

re JAWS 1,2,3 and 4's accounts have you noticed how CH have obviously told them to submit a full and complete picture with which they have not been able to comply.

IN FACT A SNAPSNOT NOW REAL TIME ONE YEAR ON MUST SHOW A CONSIDERABLY WORSE PICTURE.

ALSO TAKE NOTE THAT THEY STATE THEY HAVE NO EMPLOYEES AND THE SOLE DIRECTOR IS NOT EMPLOYED BY THEM AT ALL BUT IS AN EMPLOYEE OF A COMPANY THAT IS BANKRUPT,WHO SHOULD NOT BE RIGHT NOT ACTUALLY HAVE ANY EMPLOYEES.

WHO ARE THE ACTUAL SHAREHOLDERS OF THIS LOT?

EACH OTHER.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1. STILL need the 09 accounts, as Lehmans went down in Sept.08, so the accounts which will show that there is bugger all in these 2 JAWs, are the 30/11/09 due in August this year. 2 securitisations took place in 08, so this has just added to the net assets, but both made massive losses on

Makaveli

KwA

 

2009 accounts due in August this year ;-)

 

Everyone hear that ???

 

That was the penny dropping for ITBG ? (finally)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supersleuth thankyou for your kind assistance.I have now turned my attention to the latest sets of accounts which promise to be far more revealing and comprehensive.I also wish to thank enoughisenough for posting the reports of Carmel Butler and Mr Fulcher which I discovered to be a detailed and damming condemnation of the sordid industry in which we have become an unwilling cog.Would anyone here know if these esteemed authors can be contacted? Their combined presence added to the weight of these magnificent expose's would surely clinch the allegiance of the investigative journalist mentioned.I would add one proviso in order to obtain her immediate attention it should be indicated in a prelude to the submission of these reports that this is a billion pound industry that is continuing unabated and un regulated by the weak authorities charged with its oversee.This would be a good attention grabber as a start coupled with the effects of the lehmans crash and the thousands of unknown victims who have lost all they own.

I profess to finding the position of the unfortunate sole Lady director abandoned and solely responsible for these companies to be one of utter mystification.Surely she is aware that in all probability she will be disqualified and face criminal charges and even possibly a custodial sentence for the many discrepancies and the activities of the companies abandoned to her sole responsibility if the authorities investigate the many missing millions.Powerful investors will demand to know what has happened to their money.I would advise her to resign immediately if this is the case and offer her full co-operation with the investigating authorities lest she becomes the real culprits scapegoat..

Please forgive the indulgences of an elderly "silver surfer" but I have several suggestions for our friend the bad person's delightful charges.As a memento of his time here which could be prematurely terminated at any time if his behaviour remains untempered,I would suggest the following nomenclature for his consideration.

I find the names of the sisters of mercy on this site of great appeal.

Ell-enn of whom I believe he has professed affection has an ethereal,spiritual and other wordly quality as does Caro, both in the same vein as Lara Lor-van.I also like the unusual name of Carmel ,all have been champions of our cause and deserve rememberance.

Rumour has it that the bad person has been seeking physcological treatment as he has found himself constantly humming this ditty to himself of late.

I feel it in my fingers

I feel it in my toes

Jackals are all around me

And so the feeling grows

 

poor boy, I believe he's suffering from a persecution complex,please leave him be,he has great responsibilities.

Edited by actionnotwords
Link to post
Share on other sites

LC

Don't forget to bait the trap for your adversaries, although I am in agreement with supersleuth especially now in the knowlege that the site is under constant surveillance,that all are welcome here,their true loyalty can be easily established by their response and participation in the processes that need to be progressed.

To satisfy curiosity where does the term LC originate from and what is it's meaning and significance?

Edited by actionnotwords
spelling.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, enjoying the banter

 

Fos looking into my case, but if companys go down, no redress for me, could post up a thread but if you look back after repossession, no one seems to know where to go, posts ignored. It's true. only supersluth, This could be you. I do not like being a victim, more should be said for the victims, I hate the time lapse that help is out there now, what about

the familys that have lost their homes. If something is wrong then its wrong. LMC pushed us into losing my home. I have info, but would be identified.

 

It can not be right to steel from a person who has been repossessed and it seems like they are getting away with it.

 

If your repossessed you are treated like ****, and as I said I had a mortgage for 34 years.

 

I could do my own thread, but will not get help and support.

 

Getting to the bottom of this has been my saviur, dont want to go to another thread, believe no help there. No one seems to know or care after repos. We all should fight for the familys that had no knowledge of cag forget limitations, what is wrong is wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agatha c

forget the idle crazy talk just a form of release here it will all get kicked out anyway.

There is a serious theme running below the superficiality.You have done the right thing involving the fos despite what some would say,this is from my own personal experience anyway.

You may well have a claim despite repo the gmac repos were told they could claim by the fsa, how you could evaluate such a claim with the stress and everything else involved is difficult to know.

You pose an interesting question.Your mortgage was obviously securitized by lmc so the beneficial title ie the rights to all repayments were held by the spv.When you were repoed they would have been paid the price they paid for your mortgage it would be assumed ,so in reality your claim could well be against them I would think.Comments are invited this is an important dilemma you have raised here which many will face.

If it was decided that your case involved unfair charges which were added to your real arrears and resulted in repo where does the owner of the loan stand then?and is it the spv or lmc?who is liable?because the paper legal titleholder lmc reoed your property on behalf of the spv.

Would you know who the spv was?

Edited by ryde
Link to post
Share on other sites

agathac, was your mortgage with London Mortgage Company Ltd?

 

roughly, what month & year were you repoed?

 

did you always make your payments to LMC limited, via capstone?

 

was mortgage contract/deed in the name of LMC Ltd?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Makaveli

KwA

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6236

 

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

 

SHUT'EM DOWN!!!!> SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have better things to do than keep moving off topic posts to the Bear Garden so have unapproved a number of them. Abuse isn't allowed in there either.

 

Please abide by site rules which are linked here in case anyone isn't familar with them. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forum-rules-please-read/9-forum-rules-please-read.html#post16

 

What's Best for You?

 

 

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

 

Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007

Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06

Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007

:p

 

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Agatha,

 

It is always a good idea to start a thread. Different people have different problems, so the advice for one person might not be good for another.

 

Even if SPML et al were all to close today, dependant upon the circumstances you might still be able to claim and more importantly receive compensation from:

 

FSCS > Home

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have contacted Heather Brooke. Hopefully something will come of that...

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very quiet tonight...?

 

I'll respond to your pm ryde when I get a proper moment.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just playing the waiting game..I don't want to post anything that will conflict with my case. It's a problem as I'd love nothing more than to help anyone here. All I can say is get all the information held upon you and keep the complaints going. Add up all your statements and don't take no for an answer if you know you are right. Don't accept any offer of compensation made directly by the company or sign anything that they send to say as much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

agatha C,

well posted in 5269 it sates it all and I for one fully agree with you.

There are some which will agree and some that don't but until a repro happens to you you do not know how low these people will go and the lies they tell.

The FSA is as good as a wet towel back in the 90's to now and the lenders got away with murder!.

Thats why now GMAC have had to pay not because of this government or any one there saying lets help these poor people but because of the EU rules.

 

I for one can not post at the moment because of thing happening but still watching.

Keep on in there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...