Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have got a copy of the charge. The Land Registry responded to say that the document attached to the RX1 was as follows. The A4 document headed 'Health and Social Services and Social Security Adjudications Act 1983 and National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990' is a statutory charge. However as the person concerned (your late father) was one of joint proprietors of the property, the charge could not be registered or noted. Instead it was protected by registration of a restriction.   This is a statutory charge that has arisen under section 22 of the Health and Social Services and Social Security Adjudications Act 1983.   Unfortunately the Land Registry blog was discontinued on 30 June 2020 [I only found out today!] they're waiting for a new platform which could take a few weeks - so I haven't been able to obtain any other advice, other than what I found in the Hardwick and co website today which stated that S22 of HASSA had been repealed and stated that    After 1 April 2015 a Local Authority will only be able to recover unpaid care home fees by securing a judgment debt either in the County Court or the High Court (s69(1) of the Act). and The Act increases the time limit for the recovery of a debt comprising of unpaid care home fees from three years to six years from the date the sum becomes due   hence I thought that as the fees had not been paid and more than 3 years had elapsed that perhaps the charge was no longer extant?    If the restriction is such that the CS only has to notify the council [and there's no restriction on me selling] then I thought the sale could proceed while I continue to battle it out with the council. Who haven't been in touch now since 2016.   This is all very complicated - I'm sure it could be simplified!!   Thank you      
    • You've been here since 2013 so you must be aware that the tell people all the time to read our customer services guide and to record their calls. We try to remind people that if they don't record their calls then sooner or later they will regret it. I think if you do anything morning telephone you should have read our customer services guide first because then you would have the evidence you need to persuade people that you did take the action that you saved it. I suspect one of the problems it will be managing to establish that you let people know in advance. If there is a delivery which signed for that you may find that Amazon and also your bank may not be very happy about helping you out. Although the bank may activate the chargeback, they may later on after a further "investigation" for the money back from you. Suggest that you send Amazon an SAR.  
    • Thanks. Do I go to the bank and ask for this, or is this something I have to apply for outside the bank?     
    • No, definitely not, I'm always very careful with stuff like that. To the point that I'm very surprised this has happened. Thanks for responding.
    • Seconded.  Just learn from the experience for the next time and make sure this is the last money you ever give these sharks. 
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
shalamar138

SKY Multiroom minibox and copyright infringement.

Recommended Posts

This message is a copy of a reply I sent to Samantha Clark.

 

Hello Samantha,

Thanks for your message.

 

In most cases I have a lot of knowledge about consumer affairs and problems (please see my previous replies to other members). 

 

I do not have a copy of the request for advice as it was not published on your site.

 

As I remember it is about a SKY multiroom minibox that I purchased from Ireland from another seller on ebay that I wanted to use  as an extra to the already subscribed SKY Q main box and already subscribed multiroom subscription that I agreed a contract to.

 

I am a vocal entertainer and well aware of copyright infringement.

 

I cannot understand how SKY can enforce copyright infringement to enforce eBay to take down sellers adverts from selling miniboxes.

 

If the box (spur) is inactive because it cannot connect to a main box and to get the main box you have to subscribe and to be able to connect an extra box then you must subscribe extra to use it as SKY controls this option from their systems.

 

As the minibox cannot connect in any way then how can this be copyright infringement.

 

I now have a minibox that I cannot sell on as SKY has implemented a restriction to stop me from selling it on.

 

I might add that eBay have at the time of the original message had 10 miniboxes for sale/auction and these have not been taken down or removed. aken

 

 I have duplicated this message to the forum for you to pick up.

 

Many thanks

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be very helpful if you could post your story properly spaced and punctuated.

It's very difficult for people to follow solid blocks of text and it may dissuade some people from giving the help that otherwise you might receive.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is typewritten this way as it is a cut and paste from a text. It is also very explanatory in that others can understand it explaining the term of events and to warn others of the pitfall of buying and selling Sky related devices.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Post spaced


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

 

As the minibox is a spur and cannot receive programming on its own.

It is rendered useless without a contracted Q box and subscription for multiroom being put in place. 

This then cannot be rendered copyright infringement.

 

The seller of such a box would then be correct to sell the box.

It is the buyer who would infringe copyright without having subscribed to SKY to activate multiroom authorisation. 

 

Many thanks for your help and taking the time to edit my post.

 

I have been around for a long while (a bit long in the tooth) and a bit thick :-)

Do I just leave your correction as it is or do I relist it

 

Thanks again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. I'm not sure what you mean about relisting. Your post is still here, it's just had a few paragraphs put into it. 

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB, I`m new to this site and how it functions. Seeing the reply I thought it was just me who would see the changes. But if it was you who assisted A BIG THANK YOU  :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, dx did the spacing but don't worry about that. :)  We just need people to see your new thread and reply to you. We'll help you sort this out.

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this situation is a bit like the various other like devices that 'could' be adapted to receive 'free' content that is otherwise not so.

 

what did samantha say to invoke your above reply..

 

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Samantha saw my post on the FB page and advised I might get assistance because I originally paid for the minibox and because of SKY`s intervention means I am stuck with a box (having left SKY) that I cannot sell on. But eBay still listing boxes for others. Hmmm very unfair and discrimatory !   :-(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry, who says you can't sell it on...?? poppy cockle!


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the response from eBay:-

We had to remove your listing because it didn’t follow our Enabling infringement policy. Listings or items that encourage or enable copyright or trademark infringement are not allowed

What activity didn't follow the policy



We removed your item as it was reported to us by Sky. Please note that this item is not allowed on our site. Please don't relist this item.For more information please read our help pages or contact Sky directly on: https://business.sky.com/fighting-fraud/ OR sky@rightsmediation.com

 

I also tried another selling website and got the same response

 

Unfortunately we have had to remove your ad "Sky Q Multiroom Minibox" posted in the category "Satellite & Cable Equipment" from the site.

We have reason to believe that your ad is offering an item that infringes on intellectual property (IP) rights.  

It is likely that the IP rights owner has contacted us to alert us to this ad. 
 

there are numerous ads of the same box being sold right now:-

 

WHat is intellectual property (IP) rights.

 

(ads removed - dx)

 

    •       

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly I just think you got targeted.

don't forget ebay is gov't by Luxy EU laws 

 

not much you can do.

 

dx

 


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can always ask SKY if they want it back and pay me for it ha ha ha ha ha     As Simon says "JUST KIDDING"!

 

I suppose if anything this entry is going to be a strong advisory to not buy a mini box privately otherwise you will get stuck with it !

 

I had a look for the intellectual property IP rights :-

 

Intellectual property rights are the rights given to persons over the creations of their minds. They usually give the creator an exclusive right over the use of his/her creation for a certain period of time.

 

I would like to thank everyone for their advice and help   :-)  :-)  :-) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please let us know how it goes and don't worry about coming back with other questions, shalamar.

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that HB. As I said before I have assisted others before but just on the FB page and have enjoyed doing this.

 

So you never know I might bump into you some time in the future ha ha ha ha

 

C YA - HB

 

Shalamar138  :-) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget where we are. :)

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wont

 

Always ready and waiting

 

:-) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...