Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds


You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds



BankFodder BankFodder


BankFodder BankFodder

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Sorry but why am I getting email after email about this post sent to me ?   
    • if your loan is an unsecured loan, but you own a home were they to make you bankrupt, could you lose the home....... .............   i will assume you are talking about your wife's debts? as you've said YOU don't own a home ?  
    • Shops at the retail park beside me were mobbed today, last week the motorway between Glasgow and Edinburgh was as busy as it ever has been.
    • I have a loan with Commsave dx, the deductions come straight from my wages. When you join you tell them how much you want to save either weekly or monthly and you authorise them take deductions from your wages towards your savings account with them, same thing apply's when you have a loan with them.
    • I went from Virgin Media to Sky Q earlier this year as I wasn't a great fan of Tivo and was keen to try Sky Q.   When it was installed, I was offered the chance to replace my aging (ten year old) dish which I accepted.   In the last few days, I've come to the conclusion that Sky Q isn't for me and that I'd ideally like to downgrade it at the end of my contract to go back to using my old Sky+ HD box, which I still have.   Much to my surprise, I subsequently found out that the LNB on my dish would not be compatible as Q uses a special "wide band" LNB and the older boxes do not.   I contacted Sky to confirm this, which they did.   They also told me that there would be nothing they could do and that if I wanted to continue using my dish with my older box then I would have to pay to get it re-fitted myself which, after some investigation, would cost me at least £150 pounds.   The issue of future compatibility wasn't mentioned anywhere in the literature or the official Sky Q contract, but the Sky employee I was talking to agreed that it could present a problem and said that he would pass it "up the ladder" to see if the wording could be changed to better explain it to prevent any future problems - all the while telling me there was nothing they could do for me specifically.   I understand that I'm getting the service I paid for, which I have no issue with.   I understand that I'm only loaning the equipment and that it has to be returned at the end of the contract.   That I also have no problem with.   The contract also states that the dish becomes mine at the point of installation as well, which is also fine.   Basically, Sky have provided the service stated in the contract.   My problem with this is that Sky must clearly know that many people use, and still use, older boxes.   They still sell viewing cards for these older boxes, so that in itself should be enough to prove that they are aware of the compatibility issues between the two pieces of hardware.   Should there not have been even a small advisory akin to "Customers please note: Sky Q dishes are not compatible with older hardware" ?   By choosing to omit this information,  it not only prevented me from making an informed decision at installation, as I could have apparently asked for what's called a "Hybrid LNB" which would be compatible with older hardware, but it will also leave me significantly out of pocket at the end of the contract.   Is there anything in this ?.  Can I challenge this in any capacity ?.   Ideally, I'd like them to let me out of the Sky Q contract so I can downgrade to the Sky+ HD box I own, but I accept this will likely not be possible.   I'd be interested in your thoughts.   Thankyou.
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
      Thanks for reading 
      • 6 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies

Opinion of claim value *medical report inside*

Recommended Posts

This is the medical report.


My solicitor is suggesting put forwards £7500, with acceptance over £5000. 

The is the solicitors provided as part of union cover, and from previously experience, they always seem to undervalue claims.

I feel they are just another layer of protection companies personally..

He's repeatedly pushing me to instruct him to settle, even though I've just provided a witness to strengthen the claim.


"This report has been provided for The Court with information contained in the solicitor’s letter of instruction, brief Occupational Health records and G P records from June 2016.  Identity was confirmed by passport and driving licence.

Mr lives with his partner.Â* He has four children, three of whom live at home.Â* He works on assembly for _________, where he has worked for seven years.Â* His interests include boxing and attending a gym.

Review of medical records confirms that his health in the past has been good although he has psoriasis and he has long term anxiety due to problems at work.Â* He was involved in a motorcycling accident in 2012 but all injuries settled completely. He has keratoconus of his left eye which has resulted in a degree of visual disturbance.Â*

There is an entry in his occupational health records which states that he had right shoulder pain in October 2015.Â* He was seen at ******* Hospital and an ultrasound scan was performed.Â* I have not seen the report on this scan but I assume that there was no major problem since no significant action was taken.Â* Further details may be available should relevant records be reviewed in the future.

Mr ****** states that he started work for ******** in January 2012.Â* He performed various jobs but he had no problem for about four years.


In January 2016 he was changed to a job where he had to use an overhead crane on rollers to move differentials and then position them in vehicles.Â* This involved considerable pulling and twisting, the process being repeated about 300 times each shift.

At first he was aware of considerable strain on his shoulders and back but he coped for several weeks without discomfort.

Soon after starting the job the rollers became worn and defective and he had to use much more effort to move the differentials.Â* He very quickly began to develop discomfort and stiffness in his shoulders and in the central part of his back.Â* He reported the problem but although help was promised no immediate action was taken.

He continued to work over the next two weeks during which time he had increasing pain and stiffness in his shoulders and in his back.Â* He went to his occupational health department where physiotherapy was arranged but he was not informed of the subsequent appointment and therefore he received no treatment.Â* He saw his G P and he was prescribed Naproxen but this is not recorded in his medical records.

About two weeks after reporting the problem the rollers were fixed and he continued to perform the job with the usual degree of physical strain.Â* Symptoms continued but he then had physiotherapy on his shoulders with some improvement.Â* He took Paracetamol and Ibuprofen.

The situation remained unchanged over the next few months but at the end of 2016 he had to take nine months off work due to work related stress.Â* In spite of this prolonged period of rest he continued to have pain and stiffness in both shoulders and variable discomfort in the central part of his back.

He returned to work in August 2017 following which he coped with light work for about six months.Â* He still had shoulder and back pain but there had been some improvement.

In October 2017 he had a detailed assessment of his shoulders by a physiotherapist.Â* It was stated that he had previously had an MRI scan in 2016 which confirmed bilateral shoulder impingement.Â* He was found to have good movement of both shoulders although he still had pain at the limits of movement and on strain. Â*

Aggravating factors were overhead activity, attempting to hold his arms at head level for prolonged periods of time and carrying his youngest child.Â* It was suggested that he might see an orthopaedic specialist.

Unfortunately he continued to have work related stress and he has been unable to work since April 2018 although he now feels that he would be able to return.

He still has pain in the front and the upper aspects of both shoulders on strain with some aching at rest.Â* In spite of this he can cope with all routine activity but he avoids strenuous activity.Â* He has aching in the central part of his back which is increased by strain and he feels that all symptoms have been unchanged for a prolonged period of time.Â* No further treatment is contemplated.

Following the onset of pain in his shoulders and back Mr ****** continued to work and he took only one week off work in 2016 as a result of shoulder pain.Â* Two prolonged periods of time off work have been due to stress.Â* He now feels that he would be fit to return to work if suitable work was to be offered.
Activity at home has been restricted by ongoing symptoms and he has returned to boxing or to his gym.Â* He has been less involved with his children when symptoms have been particularly troublesome.

Mr ******* presents as a healthy man who is right handed.Â* He gives a clear account of his problem although some details may be vague due to the passage of time.

Examination of his shoulders reveals no abnormality.Â* In particular there is no tenderness around either joint and all shoulder movements are full and pain free.

Examination of his thoracic and lumbar spines reveals no abnormality.Â* In particular spinal contours are normal, there is no tenderness over the spinous processes or associated musculature and all back movements are full and painfree.

There is no other relevant abnormality on general examination.

Mr ******* suffered pain and stiffness in both shoulders and in the central part of his back following repetitive strain at work in March 2016.Â* Even though the major cause of the strain was eventually removed symptoms have continued.

Examination of his shoulders excludes major damage and MRI scans have revealed impingement.Â* This is consistent with the repeated strain as described.Â* It seems that the situation, after expert assessment, is not considered sufficient to require surgery.Â* He has had physiotherapy and performed exercises, and had prolonged rest during time off work due to stress.

The present situation is that he continues to complain of discomfort in certain circumstances but he has good movement and he can cope with all routine activity.Â* Shoulder problems often run a very prolonged course but it is likely, if he able to avoid excessive strain, that his shoulder problems will eventually settle but this could take five years from the time of onset of symptoms.Â* No further treatment is indicated as long as the situation does not deteriorate.

He has continued to have pain an stiffness in the central part of his beck although this no longer prevents normal activity.Â* Examination excludes major damage and symptoms are due to soft tissue injury.Â* It is difficult to understand why progress has been so slow but it is likely that his physical symptoms have been exacerbated by ongoing stress and frustration.

It is very difficult to predict the outcome of long term back symptoms but I feel that there is a good chance of his back returning to normal in the next year or two as long as he avoids excessive or repetitive strain.

In the last three years Mr ****** has suffered considerable stress due to problems at work and I feel that he has been in a vicious circle where physical and psychological problems have each exacerbated the other.Â* He feels that his level of stress is now much reduced and it would be very much to his advantage, from all points of view, to return to work"


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this:



please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..


if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Separate issue later In 2016 @dx100uk



Edited by carlbcfc

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites



Is this a PI lawyer you're dealing with and have you had an independent medical report done?



Illegitimi non carborundum




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes PI lawyer, and independent medical. Although the Dr is the ex Dr for the company I worked for, and mates with the owner of the law firm. But I’ve no issue with the findings.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Have you actually issued a court claim or are you at some sort of preliminary negotiation stage?  Does that medical report support your claim?  (Unless I'm misreading it, it seems quite optimistic about your prognosis, and it's not clear to me that it supports a claim for £7500?  What are you claiming for?  Does it include loss of earnings?).


You say in the opening post that the solicitors you use always seem to "undervalue claims".  I'm not sure what you mean?


You then post that the author of your "independent" medical report is a former employee of your employer (against whom I presume you are claiming) and also that he is a "mate" of the senior partner of your solicitors.


Perhaps I'm being paranoid but that all seems a little irregular to me.  If I were making a claim against my employer, I would not be particularly happy about the doctor writing my independent report being either a former employee of the defendant or a mate of my solicitor.  Their independence (either way) could easily be called into question.

Edited by Manxman in exile
  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...