Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capital one Irresponsible lending ?


Wisey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1434 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, 

 

 

I do apologise if this is in the wrong please. i haven't posted for a while.

 

I have a friend who has a capital one credit card.

When she applied for it she had some basic questions, employment status etc.

She is long term sick on ESA and PIP. 

she made them aware of this by ticking the unemployed box.

They offered her a £200 limit initailly. 

 

She has had the card for around 2 years now and had small increases since having it.

However the latest credit increase is £1,600!

Which is in no way sustainable to pay back, she has almost reached the limit on it and is no worried about repayments.

They have given her a payment holiday due to covid -19 but even still they add interest onto it.

which is defeating the purpose of the payment holiday.

 

I was wondering if irresponsible lending could be considered here, as they were well aware of her financial situation yet had no issues giving her a massive limit. 

 

Any advice on how to go about this is greatly received. 

 

Many thanks. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if she has managed to date to pay the required monthly amount....

they will regularly up her credit limit because they have proof she is able to properly manage her credit.

 

don't think she will get far trying to claim IRL here IMHO.

 

she needs to write to them (and all her other creditors?) with our pro rata letter offering a reduced sum as long as they freeze int and not charge unlawful fixed sum penalty fees.

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello dx 

 

Thanks for ur reply. 

 

I did wonder. 

The last linit she had was £600. So to wack it up to £1,600 was quite a hyke. 

 

She was maintaining repayments with the smaller limits  but has struggled since even selling things to make a payment or cutting bak on food. 

 

She has 2 snall kids under 10 so she cant really cut back to much. What reduced sum should she offer. 

 

What is worst case scenario on this should she not be able to repay. Shes blind worries about DCAs, courts etc. Iv explained the best i can about it to try calm her but theres only so much reassurance i can give her given her mental health.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its a consumer debt, don't forget dca's have absolutely zero legal powers and are not bailiffs and never  can be.

 

she should not ever be cutting back anything to pay any consumer credit debt.

the original creditors cant do anything really but as they are duty bound and that is too HELP

 

they'll eventually sell the debt on to a DCA<10p=£1.. and they'll try and fleecer her.

 

have a good read in the debt self help forum

you'll get the idea.

 

she must have other debts on her credit file

better to look at the whole picture rather than ONE debt

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Apologies for such a long time to reply.

 

So Update.

There is more debts outstanding. 

 

She has applied to her local credit union for a debt consolidation loan.

They went over her income/expenditure etc.

 

Over alot of hmming and harrring they have agreed to the £3,500 applied for to Clear all outstanding creditors, so she can repay at a much better rate with fixed interest instead of mounting interest.

 

I spoke to the lady on the phone and she said that they want proof of the debts being cleared and proof of the accounts being closed.

 

My question really is can they ask her for that information??

I shall be insuring the debts are paid,

i can understand to a degree but account closure? 

 

she has always had 1 credit card in case of emergencies and if she has to close it, it may in the future be detrimental.  

 

Aside from that could she ask capital one for a full and final settlement figure?

balance currently owed is £1592,

she said that she tried to offer them £1400 as full settlement but they didn't seem interested.

She is currently on a payment holiday for 3 months.

 

Other debts owed Vanquis bank £215

Paypal Credit £1475 ( also on a payment holiday)

 

Plans are to clear these in full.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

woe slow down..why is she getting more credit to pay off the existing...?!?!?!?

 

paypal credit, is this just a paypal negative balance or she took out paypal credit itself?

if so I bet that's with paypal EU not a uk creditor so stuff and all they can do to her.

 

vanquis is peanuts at £215 offer then £5PCM

she doesn't need a loan

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its paypal credit. Like a credit card but an online  credit balance.  

 

Shes opted for that because they wont drop the interest so itl just be piling up.  How would she find out who the paypal credit is with? 

 

She realy didnt know what else to do. 

 

ok it says :

Credit is offered by PayPal (Europe) S.à.r.l et Cie, S.C.A which is duly licensed as a Luxembourg credit institution and is under the prudential supervision of the Luxembourg supervisory authority, the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep luxy, so not covered by UK laws..

and it doesn't show on UK credit files..

 

so just arrange a small payment to vanquis say £5PCM

and 

one with Cap1

 

use the pro rata letter..

 

please never ever take out credit to pay credit, cause it's always sOOO tempting to run it up again

that's why CU wanted proof of closure.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so are u saying not pay paypal?

she hasnt signed for the credit loan yet,

she just thought it was the best idea.

to pay off all debts that kept wacking on fees and then repay them at £40 a week

 

She just looked at her credit file and paypal IS showing on it.

showing as Paypal (europe) Sarl et Cie SCA

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you ....1st time anyone has ever bothered to investigate this EU paypal credit

we know paypal credit card (which is newday a registered UK creditor) showed.

but to date no-one ever question PP credit sarl..

 

is there a FCA number on the agreement at the bottom

or are they showing on the FCA register as a licenced creditor??

 

keep going

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i googled https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/consumer-credit-register

 

I put in paypal and it only shows 

PayPal europe services limited. 

 

FS register start date is blank 

Current status is Lasped. 

 

Is this the right one?  No other paypal entries

 

I cant find an FCA number anywhere.

 

https://register.fca.org.uk/ShPo_FirmDetailsPage?id=001b000000Mg3m1AAB

 

 

Well ... nuts...

It says EEA registered.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

so do the same with them

offer them a pro rata payment.

 

there is no evidence anywhere that PP SARL have ever issued a court claim, though i'm pretty sure paypal credit has not been around long.

 

she should be fearful of additional charges.

penalty fees for being late/not paid/overlimit are unlawful.

and can be challenged.

 

if you read the pro-rata letter you can also see they are duty bound to help, which inc's refraining from charging interest and penalty charges going fwd.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume that middle part 

 

" she should be fearful of additional charges.

penalty fees for being late/not paid/overlimit are unlawful.

and can be challenged. "

 

I guess u mean shouldn't not should? And is a typo? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe one of my favourite mistypes too..

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Haha XD 

 

Earlier in the thread i asked about if the credit union could ask proof of the closure of the accounts. 

 

I have been in the union with her today to have an informal chat with the rep. 

 

We have read over the credit agreement 

Which only states that they are or would loaning her money for the purposes of paying the creditors listed ; x;y;x ... 

 

And then a secton that says i (name) promise to pay the sum etc of £x per week on x date for the next x amount of weeks until final selttlement date of x/22. 

 

Now nowhere on the agreement was anything about needing to send in proof of closure of the accounts. (I read it twice, im very thorough.)

 

She has requested extra time to think about it ( i have passed on your above info) but sadly i cannot force her to action it. 

She has since asked me as she has 2 dependents  under 10 would they frown upon her should she accept the loan  BUT close all but ONE of the credit accounts just in case of emergencies. 

 

---For example if she is paid monday but its friday and hasnt anything left and she needs to put fuel in the car to get somewhere such as a hospital/Dr or to merely  buy milk. Worst case. ---

 

 

She asked me if she thought if she kept the one with the least credit limit amount ( vanquis limit £250.) The others are £1500 and £1600.  Would they be funny about it. Or what could they do if she did do this.

 

My opinion is that the choice is ultimately hers but since their is no legally binding clause on the agreement that states she has to close them is there anything they could do? So long as they are getting their repayments? 

 

- Wisey 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit unions view themselves as a cross between a responsible lender and a debt management company.

 

That stance is an oxymoron and conflicting at best.

 

but both would agree that paying off high int credit with a lower int source..saves money, however, latterly running up the very cause of the need of the loan, would be financial suicide.

 

can they enforce that, ..of course not

 

but why do anything in the 1st place?

Use the prorata route and that results in no int whatsoever! As the creditor MUST be seen to help under fca rules..freeze int...stop penalty charges.

 

Much cheaper!!!

 

DX

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So in short no they cant make her close it. 

 

I wil do my best to convince her to do that Dx but of corse like all things i cant force her only advise.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

but they don't need any reason to void a loan made under the consumer credit act..

which hers will be...

 

she is already protected by the act, why sign another agreement 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cancel then..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...