Jump to content


Backdoor Lowell CCJ - old Hutch/3 mobile debt - debt was SB'D **SET ASIDE** still chasing?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1228 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

doh i think the muppets have forgotten they already agreed to set aside ...:crazy:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply - I'm half expecting them to either drop the whole thing or to spring the "We had to tell the court that you don't want to pay so we're going to restart proceedings" idea given the language in the consent order that I signed with them. Going to read up and prepare to defend in case they fancy playing that game. It'd be nice if they would actually play by the rules for once...

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can't it's SB'd.

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

They've had another go today - same little begging letter as before pretty much so I won't bother posting it in full here but they've decided not to bother putting in the Tomlin order option. Gotta love the "If a settlement cannot be reached within 14 days from the date of this email, further action may be taken against you." Emphasis mine. It "may" be taken? I'm pretty convinced it won't.

Would it be worth another SB letter or do I just ignore it as there's nothing they can do here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes why not

then we will hit them with conc 

maybe get a bit of compo out of them..

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent the standard SB letter by email and by recorded delivery yesterday, woke up to this in my inbox from Lowell:

Quote

We note that your email is the same as the email sent to us on 21 October 202 and this was responded to. We also recognise that you may be using a template copied from the internet. Please see the following response to your internet template:

 

“We note that you believe the account to be statute barred, and as such, you consider that we should not pursue the debt any further. However, the default date for the account was on 13 February 2014 and as by issuing a Claim within 6 years of this date we are satisfied that the Claim is not statute barred and are entitled to bring proceedings to recover the sums outstanding.”

 

Taking in the above information, we now ask that you respond appropriately to our email below within 14 days from the date of this email.

 

I'm thinking that they're throwing their toys out of the pram a little and the statement they gave isn't the proof that we'er asking for... sounds like they know they can't win this and are relying on intimidation/begging. Shame about that 🤣

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because the claim was set a side.....it does not mean its been abandoned...it merely remains stayed until the claimant informs the court if they wish to proceed.They set a date of 23rd Oct to try to reach a settlement and at which time they will inform the court  the status  of the claim.

 

So at this stage the following is still correct.....unless they discontinue the claim or they leave it stayed indefinitely  at which point you could challenge their position for leaving it stayed

 

Quote

However, the default date for the account was on 13 February 2014 and as by issuing a Claim within 6 years of this date

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt is not regulated by the CCA1974...there is no requirement to issue a Default Notice.Check your statements or with the Mobile provider for last payment date.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 15/05/2020 at 16:57, ridecar2 said:

I have just phoned them, my last payment was August 2013.

they're claiming that the default date was the 14th Feb 2014 and that they commenced the legal action on or around the 25th January this year, making the debt not statute barred,

 

I'm asking them to email me everything that they have about this case,

 

thank you all for your help and I'll update you when I get more information.

 

the debt was already SB'd when they raised the claimform..

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Oh how surprise d i am

you won

 

dont forget to donate

keep us here for you and others to come and get help

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...