Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1456 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I bought a bespoke x box controller that was bespoke.

 

Received it and it does not work, do I have any rights to return it for a refund or do I have to accept a repair, they have stated under their T&C's they wont refund as it is bespoke, where do I stand legally?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is faulty then it comes under the usual rules about short-term right to reject contained in the Consumer Rights Act. The issue of the item being bespoke only refers to items which are bought online and are being returned under the 14 day cooling off period rules.

The supplier is wrong. If you bought the item within the last 30 days then you should write to them by letter or by email and make it clear that you are asserting your short-term right to reject and that you want a refund. Their terms and conditions have nothing to do with it and are unenforceable.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, BankFodder said:

If it is faulty then it comes under the usual rules about short-term right to reject contained in the Consumer Rights Act. The issue of the item being bespoke only refers to items which are bought online and are being returned under the 14 day cooling off period rules.

The supplier is wrong. If you bought the item within the last 30 days then you should write to them by letter or by email and make it clear that you are asserting your short-term right to reject and that you want a refund. Their terms and conditions have nothing to do with it and are unenforceable.

This was bought on linedoes this effect my right?

 

I emailed the supplier and this is their reply 

 

"This is a hand made and personalised item so it is not eligible for a refund, only a repair. This is standard industry practice and is inline with the consumer rights act."

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, afcwben said:

This was bought on linedoes this effect my right?

 

 

Who are they? I can't seem to find them on the Internet – and in any case, why should this affect your right?

 

21 minutes ago, afcwben said:

I emailed the supplier and this is their reply 

 

"This is a hand made and personalised item so it is not eligible for a refund, only a repair. This is standard industry practice and is inline with the consumer rights act."

 

 

 

I've already given you the answer to this.

What was the value of the item – and have you written to them asserting your rights as I have advised?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BankFodder said:

 

Who are they? I can't seem to find them on the Internet – and in any case, why should this affect your right?

 

 

I've already given you the answer to this.

What was the value of the item – and have you written to them asserting your rights as I have advised?

The item was 69.99 and i have asserted my rights but they claim they are acting with the act

Link to post
Share on other sites

You still have an address my question as to who is the supplier. You gave a name but I can't find them. How about posting a link for us?

Secondly, you haven't given any dates of the purchase and of the date that you asserted your rights.

I think that simply having the basic detail of the story would be very helpful rather than having to tease out of you. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

You still have an address my question as to who is the supplier. You gave a name but I can't find them. How about posting a link for us?

Secondly, you haven't given any dates of the purchase and of the date that you asserted your rights.

I think that simply having the basic detail of the story would be very helpful rather than having to tease out of you. Thanks

Sorry about that here is their site https://www.defygaminguk.com/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Now what about the dates? This is a bit like pulling teeth

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, how did you pay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

Thank you. Now what about the dates? This is a bit like pulling teeth

sorry again, ordered 06/04/2020 received  21/04/2020, advised of problem 22/04/2020

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

Well clearly you benefit from the short-term right to reject as laid out in the Consumer Rights Act. You say that you have asserted your right to reject – and they have refused to step up to their responsibilities.

How did you pay?

Because this is a relatively small amount, it would be a bit of a nuisance to have to bring a legal action and might be simply easier to begin a chargeback process if you have paid with a debit card.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BankFodder said:

Thank you.

Well clearly you benefit from the short-term right to reject as laid out in the Consumer Rights Act. You say that you have asserted your right to reject – and they have refused to step up to their responsibilities.

How did you pay?

Because this is a relatively small amount, it would be a bit of a nuisance to have to bring a legal action and might be simply easier to begin a chargeback process if you have paid with a debit card.

I always pay for online stuff with a credit card just in case so assume I would have to charge this back as they are choosing to ignore my rights

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay – very good move using a credit card. Always the best thing to do. However, I believe that you can only rely on section 75 of the consumer credit act if the purchase has been for more than £100. I'm afraid that this means that you won't be able to rely on the credit card protection. I have to say that it's a strange rule – but that is it.

However, you can initiate a chargeback instead of relying on section 75. The chargeback is a voluntary scheme that the banks subscribe to – and although they don't like it, I think most banks are on board.

Get in contact the bank – do it on the phone and begin the chargeback process and let us know what happens. Also I suggest that you put up a scathing review on trust pilot and elsewhere about this company and their attitude.

Of course you have read our customer services guide because you have been with us since 2010 so I don't need to repeat to you how important it is to record your call – do I?

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

Okay – very good move using a credit card. Always the best thing to do. However, I believe that you can only rely on section 75 of the consumer credit act if the purchase has been for more than £100. I'm afraid that this means that you won't be able to rely on the credit card protection. I have to say that it's a strange rule – but that is it.

However, you can initiate a chargeback instead of relying on section 75. The chargeback is a voluntary scheme that the banks subscribe to – and although they don't like it, I think most banks are on board.

Get in contact the bank – do it on the phone and begin the chargeback process and let us know what happens. Also I suggest that you put up a scathing review on trust pilot and elsewhere about this company and their attitude.

Of course you have read our customer services guide because you have been with us since 2010 so I don't need to repeat to you the importance of recording your call – do I?

Thanks for your help in this I wioll give the bank a call and yes I do record my calls

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's been pointed out by one of my site team colleagues that a chargeback may not be available on a credit card. I had a look around and got the impression that it was possible – but clearly there is some question over it and you will have to see when you phone your bank. If their first response is that you can't do the chargeback then push it. Be insistent and see if they buckle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Digging deeper perhaps it may be possible as advised .....its getting around this £100+ or more obstacle.

 

http://www.theukcardsassociation.org.uk/individual/chargeback-for-credit-and-debit-card-purchases.asp

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd go back to the supplier and politely suggest to them that they are mistaken.  Emphasise to them that you want a full refund not because of a "change of mind", but because the controller they have supplied is faulty and does not work.  Remind them that under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (I'm not sure if that's the right statute or not - I can never remember but someone else here will know) you are entitled to reject the faulty controller within 30 days and receive a full refund.  No "standard industry practice" can remove your statutory rights.

 

You may also want to suggest that what they are telling you is unlawful if they are stating it is in line with consumer legislation and that you will consider referring it to Trading Standards.  (Bit of a bluff - see if others agree or not).

 

I'd go back to the supplier here because something similar happened to us last week.  My wife bought an expensive bit of kit online and after unpacking it and trying it decided it wasn't for her and "changed her mind".  The supplier pointed to their T&Cs saying they could deduct a minimum of 20% from the refund.  My wife replied saying "no you can't - I'm entitled to 100% refund".  The supplier came back apologetically saying they'd sent the wrong reply template by "mistake", and of course she could have a full refund!

 

I'd give them an opportunity to do the right thing...  [Edit:  I know, I'm a good natured fool!]

Edited by Manxman in exile
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Manxman in exile said:

 

I'd give them an opportunity to do the right thing...  [Edit:  I know, I'm a good natured fool!]

 

Because you've only been here since 2017 – a relative newbie. Just wait until you become calloused and distorted and bitter like the rest of us. (… or like me at any rate)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...