Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No Andy, I'll scan, redact and upload later today. So the court sent me 2 letters, same envelope and stapled together but with different dates!. 1. N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, stating: UPON considering the papers herein IT IS ORDERED THAT The claim is listed for an attended hearing 25 May....... at which court will consider allocation..  etc   2. N24 Notice of PTR/Adjnd/Restored/Hrg/Management conference TAKE NOTICE that the hearing will take place on 24 May at....... When you should attend 30 minutes has been allowed for the Hearing   No other instructions anywhere in the envelope or on the letters. Do I attend both?
    • Then leave it just proceed with the claim( strike out/SJ application are risky).....the defendant will not be permitted to rely on written evidence (documented) only verbally as they failed to comply with the N157 (unless they have filed with the court and failed to serve you a copy) ?  
    • Ive asked court to strike out for non compliance but they came back and said needs £275 application fee and formal n244  
    • Did the N24 invite either party to submit a statement ?
    • Thanks for responding Andy, that was my understanding when receiving the N24, mild panic when I got Link's WS for the date though! not sure why they would send me theirs..
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can late payment charges be avoided?


david501
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1449 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

 

It's a bit of a long shot to claim 3000 sheets of card (for leaflets) and a high capacity black toner was purchased mainly for personal use, so I think I will have to let that go.

 

In there first letter the solicitors warn that I risk a Late Payment Charge for each invoice in the sum of £40, £70 or £100 depending on the amount of the invoice.

 

The Act actually states these amounts, but per debt and not per invoice and their were actually 3 invoices not 2 as I previously mentioned. I cannot see where they are getting the £80, they are requesting, from.

 

Compensation arising out of late payment

(1)Once statutory interest begins to run in relation to a qualifying debt, the supplier shall be entitled to a fixed sum (in addition to the statutory interest on the debt).

(2)That sum shall be–

(a)for a debt less than £1000, the sum of £40;

(b)for a debt of £1000 or more, but less than £10,000, the sum of £70;

(c)for a debt of £10,000 or more, the sum of £100.

[F2(2A)If the reasonable costs of the supplier in recovering the debt are not met by the fixed sum, the supplier shall also be entitled to a sum equivalent to the difference between the fixed sum and those costs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You wont ...they make it up as they go along.....but unless or until they do actually issued a claim ..its all really irrelevant.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I made payment as promised, but received a letter from their solicitors today demanding payment of the £80 late charge and interest within 7 days or they will issue a claim. As they send their post second class, this gives me until Friday (bank holiday?)

 

Their original letter states the late charge is £40 per invoice (there were 3 invoices), the Act states £40 per DEBT under £1,000, not per invoice.

 

How should I respond?

 

Thanks,

 

David 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they'll look fools if they raise a claim for penalty fees, 

and I bet it does say WILL anything??

read it carefully

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They write:

 

As stated in our letter, our client is entitled to compensation and interest pursuant to statute, and a balance of £83 remains due.

 

Payment is due within 7 days of the date of this letter,failing which we are instructed to issue a County Court Claim. This  will add additional costs which will be claimed from you.

 

Please note that you have acknowledged the debt was due by paying the principal debt, therefore, there can be no valid defence for any claim made,

 

Interestingly they then request payment be made directly to them and not the client. I wonder if their client will see any of that??

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

BS...see it says instructed...not WILL>

 

I can instruct my dog to sit

if it does is another matter

 

always read letters very carefully.

and you see they actually say stuff all.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate what you are both saying, but these solicitor, Flint Bishop, do seem idiots.

 

However, there is an act in place to say they can recover £40 plus interest. If they pushed it and they do seem petty enough to do so, it will triple that amount.

 

 

Edited by david501
Link to post
Share on other sites

eh?

a solicitor is not a claimant, they raise the claim FOR the claimant if the claimant tells them too.

 

there is no 'act' in place ..not sure what you mean by that.

you appear to be rather green with regard to DCA's/solicitors acting as dca's and what they can actually do..stuff and all bar write scary threat-o-grams

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I though it was concluded earlier by andyorch this was not actually a B2B transaction as you were a sole trader or something?

sorry on a simple phone as out doing covid deliveries till later...

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Solicitor can become a claimant in its own right when claiming for costs uncured in the process of litigation...yes the above act is valid in B2B claims but I doubt they would go to such lengths and costs to claim £40.....but you never know...see if it ever transpires.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing...... if you dont defend it and pay within time.....just the issuance /sol fee

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Varies...but on that amount I would expect no more than £50 for preparing the particulars.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, reviewing things.

 

If I leave it and hope it goes away, it could be £158, made up of late payment fee/interest of £83, solicitors fee - £50, online summons fee - £25. 

 

I know you think they wouldn't be arsed for such a small amount, but they would get £133 for 10 minutes work from a poorly paid junior, for what they see as an open and shut case. 

 

If I agree to settle the corrected amount now, it would be £43

 

Sometimes you have cut your losses.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are not paying anything for the original faulty cart?,

nor any penalty fees associated with anything to do with the whole debacle?

 

taking those 2 into account, what, do you owe and what have you paid?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There were 4 invoices in total - 3 for goods I received in perfect condition and these have now been paid.

One invoice was for a faulty toner cartridge, and this after a long wait was fully credited at the end of February.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, david501 said:

There were 4 invoices in total - 3 for goods I received in perfect condition and these have now been paid.

One invoice was for a faulty toner cartridge, and this after a long wait was fully credited at the end of February.

 

so if everything has been paid what do you owe?
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, david501 said:

There were 4 invoices in total - 3 for goods I received in perfect condition and these have now been paid.

One invoice was for a faulty toner cartridge, and this after a long wait was fully credited at the end of February.

 

Then you defend if they issue.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx says "they'll look fools if they raise a claim for penalty fees",

 

andyorch says "A Solicitor can become a claimant in its own right when claiming for costs uncured in the process of litigation."

 

As they are requesting direct payment rather than to their client, I tend to agree with the latter opinion.

 

The solicitors say there is no defence as I have paid the original sum, so what would my defence be?

 

1. The payment of the account had been delayed because we were awaiting a credit note and then the lockdown.

I had advised the creditor that payment would be made by the end of April, which it was.

This was emailed to them before the solicitors became involved.

 

2. The solicitors wrote to me the day before Good Friday and sending their letter second class, giving me less than 24 hours to pay it.

 

3. The solicitors misquoted tha Act saying they would charge a fee £40 per invoice, when it is £40 per debt under £1,000.

 

4. The solicitors then tried to charge £80 without any breakdown of their figures.

 

If I do leave it, rather than rattling the cage, and they do issue, as I feel they will, how will the court view my defence? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfectly reasonable....and disgraceful by the claimant under the current circumstances.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...