Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Aesmith - Thank you for your recent interest in my issues.  Input on people's topics can be most useful from specialised experts or those that have similar experiences.  Some people really struggle with knowing what to do (I certainly do) - so it is most useful and helpful and reassuring when solid sensible advice is offered.  I have found there to be some very kind, helpful, supportive and legally knowledgeable people here on cag over the years - who give sound legal advice for people to roll up their sleeves and follow up on.   Of course, sometimes it can be quite challenging sifting the wheat from the chaff.  I don't have lawyer or barrister.  I sometimes attend pro-bono legal clinics for help.  And sometimes have access to barristers via a pro-bono service called Advocate.  Both ad-hoc. Pro-bono means 'free'
    • The Judge was wrong. The keeper is only INVITED to say who was driving, there is no obligation for them to say.
    • Member of the Question Time audience asks Richard Tice about Donald Trump.    
    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MBNA PPI Sar Query


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1459 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi There, 

please could anyone advise / help me with this query ? 

Recieved ppi request for more information via Questionaire. 

I have sent a Sar off to MBNA they have no details on my Credit card Agreement or how I purchased the PPi as it was 1997.

 

i cannot remember myself. At the time I was living at home a with parents, hand £2k savings in bank from Grandparents inheritance and had a medical condition. My work circumstances were 6 weeks full pay then SSP.

 

my Question is I don’t recall being asked for any of this info or receiving anything to tell me I may not Be able to claim but if there is no record how do I prove this for PPI

 

Any advice would be welcomed before I submit the questionaire 

 

thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it would have been a non advised sale anyway

so how or did you..sign up to the PPI? and/or the card in the 1st place?

 

don't ever use their questionnaire ...use the FOS one.

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve no Idea i cant recall If i applied by phone or by a form. Obviously I don’t recall if I ticked anything for PPI and as there Sar hasn’t got it I’m no better for he info.

 

ive only filled out the info above on their questionaire nothing firther is that not a good idea to send ? 

I have many statements and the ppi is on there so I suppose they would just say I was aware. 

Thats why I was wondering if my circumstances made any difference. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

lets have the full time line please...have You complained about the ppi mis-sale already? Etc etc

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A while back in 2016 I sent a letter enquiring whether I had ppi on the account, this was when  a friend advised me of all this.

They replied saying yes , giving start date and amount in ppi and they trust that fulfils maybe request. 

 

They didn’t advise me it had been Mis sold so I assumed that was it and I wasn’t eligible. 

 

Then in July 19 applied on their online enquiry form.

Received  many “ were still looking at your complaint letters and a questionaire”.

 

Sent Sar

took a while to return

- no info on credit card agreement or application as 1997.

But hasn’t my letter above to them and statements from 2011-2018.

 

They have told me I applied via postal application form but this information isn’t not held in the Sar and I cannot remember 

 

thanks for your assistance 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

fill out the below

 

put the reason down as had pre existing medical condition, xxx, proof at time enclosed, and I didn't even know till 2016 I had been charged monthly  ppi since xxx date till xxx date.

 

dx

 

2017 FOS PPI-consumer-questionnaire[1].pdf

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

THANKYou. If it goes to Fos and they say I’ve applied via post but the Sar doesn’t show that application will the Fos just accept that ? 

Thankyou 

And sorry - shall I not add the details about Lyn savings, sick pay  etc in those parts on the questionaire 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fos cq goes to mbna

You need to get upto speed....

 

Why not get reading up..

Mbna ppi

Use our search top right

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I realise that I just meant if they say no as non advised sale and you were aware of ppi as you were getting monthly statements so then I appealed it to the Fos

I am reading the threads for info thanks and appreciate your time

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to MBNA PPI Sar Query

being aware, which you weren't of the PPI... is immaterial..

 

I was not aware till 2016 I had been charged PPI, and neither would I have ever received a payout should I have ever needed it as I already had pre existing medical conditions that I now know, would have invalidated it anyway. these were not made clear to me in anything on the application mailshot I used.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks your reply on that. I’m just going through all the paperwork again from the Sar

It says they have not been able to locate a copy of the credit card agreement but that they can confirm I opened by post and applied for ppi on the sameness day and they wouldn’t have open ed the account before sight of a signed  agreement. 

 

In the log there is an entry I have attached. It says ( as far as I can make out) that I called to make a payment then then called to cancel ppc amen says something about customer been advised ppc still charged on EO. (Not sure what EO is) 

 

i don’t recall this and have a statement from 2008 where they are still charging ppi

IMG_6244.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

read other MBNA or PPI reclaim threads

know up a fosci spreadsheet listing all PPI payments

enter each on the date it was charged.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks I have been reading.

I have looked at the spreadsheets I have £938 in charges in total without interest.

I can enter these now worries.

 

im just wondering if their entry log now says I rang asking to cancel PPC in 2006 ( even though they continued to charge) whether I should return the letter today stating I wasn’t aware of ppi until my letter in 2016. 

Thanks for your assistance 

 

ALso despite sending me a letter stating I had ppi and the total amount I have paid.

They advised on the Sar they only have statements from 2011 onwards this is when my account went into credit so showed no ppi so unsure how they’ve come to that figure if the info isn’t available for me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

slow down

dont admit you knew in 2016 you had ppi to reclaim..they'll pull the 3yrs knowlege rule. and refuse you ...be careful.

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh sorry I thought on your above post you told me to write “ I was not aware until 2016 I had ppi”.

 

i May have misunderstood. I will just reply with the medical reason and leave off that I wasn’t aware as I’m not sure if they can use statute barring even though they didn’t write to me or advise me it may have been mis sold.

all my premiums were paid between 1997-2010

 

in 2011 my account went into credit and they have only sent statements from 2011 onwards

I don’t want to reply with the wrong reason I will

obviously add the medical condition and that I had savings and lived at home and see what they come back with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...