Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bristol And West Charges And Erc So It Begins


biffa1965
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6281 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Allo folks, ive been slightly delayed in dealing with the Bristol and West bearing in mind ive remortgaged three times in the last 6 years. As some of you know i m currently going after the Birmingham midshire aswell as the Chelsea. today I dispatched my Sar to the Bristol with a few slight amendments to the letter, basically warning them off playing silly buggers re asking for additional costs and delays in sending out statements etc.iam in no doubt that il suffer the same obsticles that our friend alanfromderby has recently suffered. So I wait with baited breath.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well folks it would seem that the Bristol and West are playing the same game with me that they did with Alanfromderby. Got letter this morning from a Miss Bawdon Compliance Technician stating that my £10 postal order is not an acceptable means of payment for the SAR. She further goes on to state that the time deadline starts from the day the accept the 'acceptable payment'. All of this despite the fact that I stated in my original letter that id contacted the information Office and was assured that a postal order was acceptable, and also that a previous consumeractiongroup member had been through this rigmarole and his postal order was eventually accepted. just going to go back through Alans thread and see how he dealt with this

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Alan is my hero!!!

 

Did you get my PM?

 

Also, what name/contact did you use / address?

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive got it mate. In the end I used a contact that I found on one of the previous letters.

 

Cheers :)

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Folks i have today received data including statements from the illustrious Ms Bawdon of Bristol and Wests Data Team. Must admit the lady had worked quick to provide the material. However as my morgage account with them went back to 2004. She has only included material from 1999 onwards. She has however stated in her attached letter the following

'There is also a delay with the issuing of producing duplicate annual morgage statements from before 1999, This is due to a change in banking systems and information being archived. Again this informaion will be sent as soon as received'.

 

Now from the information i have to hand at the moment ie....1999 til close of account 2003, there is a couple of grand in charges. The bulk are pre 1999.( Not touchin erc at this stage). Can i still submit a claim for the period 1999 til 2003(the data i have to hand at the mo) or should i wait for the pre 1999 stuff (have to admit tho i know it will exceed £5000 poss fast track)

 

what do you folks think.Zoot if your out there id appreciate your take on this situation

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Folks I have n today received the rest of my statements going back to 1994, the whole claim for charges comes to around £4000. However a good bulk of these charges are desscribed as litigation fees (some £1500 worth) is it still possible to claim these? surely Bristol and West need to justify these charges what do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many of the "Litigation Charges" on my claim ended up being internal fees. It is important now to list every charge you wish to dispute, and send a letter to B&W asking that they provide:

 

a) A full explanation of what the charge is for.

b) Where the charge is an internally generated fee - what the actual costs were to Bristol & West in relation to that charge.

c) Where the charge relates to outside expenditure - what was this expenditure for, and to what company or statutory body was it paid.

d) Documentary evidence in support of the above.

 

At this stage I would not put any figure on your potential claim. Just state that you believe that many of the charges levied are unlawful, and that you will be forced to commence legal action against them if they fail to provide a satisfactory response to your request for information within 14 days (or 21 if you are feeling generous).

 

It is vital with B&W that you challenge everything, and put them to provide justification for their charges. By doing this, you will then be able to clearly see what items can be properly disputed. It will also put them in a very weak position when the matter inevitably escalates into a court claim.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alan, my LBA for B&W is due to go out early next week (they have replied already with the 'NO YOU AINT HAVING IT AS YOU KNEW' reply last week...

 

Have you got a draft template at all for this?

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alan, my LBA for B&W is due to go out early next week (they have replied already with the 'NO YOU AINT HAVING IT AS YOU KNEW' reply last week...

 

Have you got a draft template at all for this?

 

zootscoot better understands the process over ERC's, there should also be some information in the Mortgage Forum stickies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - Don't mean to highjack this thread but need some advice from people already dealing with B&W.

 

I am of a mind to claim back my ERC from B&W. Having lost my final statement (I moved mortgages May 2004) I applied for a copy from B&W who charged me £20.00 for the privilege.

 

My statement does not actually use the wording "Early Redemption Charge" but does show that I was charged 5% interest (approx £2800) of the outstanding amount in the last month. The 5% charge was in accordance with B&W detailed charges for 'early settlement'.

 

Given that the statement doesn't actually state ERC, should I still proceed and try and reclaim the £2800?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Folks I have today written to the good folk of Temple Quay asking them to justify their so called litigation fees (some £1600 worth of them). i have been delayed in dealing with this having been tied up with my Birmingham Mids case. i await the reply fom Bristol and West with baited breath

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent my LBA off following Zoots advice in my B&W thread.

I havent questioned ANYTHING - I just sent off the LBA as per the template in the stickies...

 

Have I done a booboo???

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Folks in light of recent developments i will be puuting my Bristol and West ERC on hold for the mo. Now the problem i have at the mo, is the following.

 

All my Bristol and West charges combined come to about £3800.00

The litigation fees account for approx £2300.00 of the above.

Following alanfromderbys advice i have written to the B+W to ask them to justify the litigation fees, iam almost sure they will not be able to do this.

The charges go back to 1996 at the earliest, therefore IF it goes to court with interest added it is going to be fastrack (ive worked it out, just exceeds £5000 with interest added). Now given our recent fastrack upsets (from which we re all still recovering) can anyone see any danger in this? or should this be a foregone conclusion as it relates to charges alone?

i dont underestimate the clout of the B+W i .know theryre not the easiest of foes to deal with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As this isn't an ERC it will be different - but I would read Aln's thread a couple of times and ask alan for any advice if you are stuck as he has been through a lot with them and both sides have conceded on some points - so he is best placed to help you with the workings of B&W.

Good Luck with this - be preapred for a long drawn out battle.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...