Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tenant with CCJ - Rent Guarantee Insurance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1496 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I am a landlord and would like to rent out my property.  And then we have found a potential tenant through OpenRent, great! 

 

However, the tenant, she is very upfront with us and honest, she had 2 CCJ records marked as "discharge".  As a results, it is very high chances the referencing will come back as fail because of the CCJ records that hold against her back in 2016 and 2018.

 

She is a single mum with 2 kids and is a DSS tenant.  We have interviewed the tenant, she is genuine and honest person,   a good single mum that work hard to feed the kids.  She has been renting the current place for 8 years, due to the landlord wants to sell the property she has no choice but to look for another place to rent.

 

Now the dilemma is, as a landlord, I have make so many phone call to look for a the insurance company that accept her case, hasnt got any luck!  May i know anyone has any ideas or came across this before? Advice will be greatly appreciated.

 

Also, some of the RGI company has taken this product offline because of Corona Virus outbreak.

 

Thanks in advance whoever will be able to advise.

 

Thanks,

Orch

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I hope somebody will come along to be able to give you the advice you need – but I have to say that it seems to me that you are making a very decent gesture and a great effort to help somebody who's obviously vulnerable and in need.

Bravo!

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

a ccj is only considered discharged if its paid within the 1 month from judgement, or the credit decides you don't owe it, i'e you are discharged of the CCJ as the debt has been paid or removed

 

though I've never seen it listed as such on a credit file

 

new one on me too?

 

does she know about what the debts were?

who are the listed claimants?

 

and did she ever respond/defend them?

or were they backdoor default judgements?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked the tenant to find out more about the CCJs and she rang the relevant court (County Court Business Centre in Northampton). They told her that both debts had been bought by Lowell. Both original debts were with EE. So I guess it was bought before the month expired.

 

The tenant was clearly not aware of it being sold on to Lowell. If Lowell or EE haven't contacted her after the CCJ, have Lowell/EE breaching any GDPR regulations by not informing her that CCJ (and personal details) have been transferred/bought without her consent. What are her rights here?

 

In the meantime, should she try to contact Lowell to attempt to pay off her debt?

 

What actions do you recommend?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you get Rent Guarantee Insurance  if the tenant is DSS as you say above ?

 

Have you always used RGI and has it ever paid out for you, if appropriate ?

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are called backdoor CCJ's 

 

Lowell dca are a debt buyer

they buys these debts for <10p=£1 from the original 'creditors'

then file court claims using an old address as she'd obviously moved and never told her creditors she'd moved.

 

paying the CCJ's off does not remove them.

setting them aside is the only way to guarantee to remove them or poss a mutual consent order

but why these are listed as discharge is another matter.

 

most of these telecom CCJ's lowells get are almost totally made of costs per month to end of contract to supply the service - which couldn't be used anyway as the service was already disconnected.

most of these CCJ's if defended are discontinued as charges till end of contract are unlawful.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There should be a date after the discharged entry. This is Clearscore Credit files terminology

 

A CCJ will be on your credit report for 6 years from the date of judgement/decree. Also, the date the CCJ is terminated from the Court will reflect as the 'Discharged Date' on their Clear Score report, hence if you can see that 'discharged: undefined ' it means that the CCJ is still active

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, slick132 said:

Would you get Rent Guarantee Insurance  if the tenant is DSS as you say above ?

 

Have you always used RGI and has it ever paid out for you, if appropriate ?

I would be able to get RGI if the tenant is DSS. It's the CCJ that insurer's taking issue with, which is fair enough if it is outstanding.

TBH I have never used RGI before, I have read some insurers are good and some try to weasel of payment. I have had bad tenants before and really want some peace of mind, this time around.

 

1 hour ago, dx100uk said:

they are called backdoor CCJ's 

 

Lowell dca are a debt buyer

they buys these debts for <10p=£1 from the original 'creditors'

then file court claims using an old address as she'd obviously moved and never told her creditors she'd moved.

 

paying the CCJ's off does not remove them.

setting them aside is the only way to guarantee to remove them or poss a mutual consent order

but why these are listed as discharge is another matter.

 

most of these telecom CCJ's lowells get are almost totally made of costs per month to end of contract to supply the service - which couldn't be used anyway as the service was already disconnected.

most of these CCJ's if defended are discontinued as charges till end of contract are unlawful.

 

 

Thanks for the information. I am keen to help the tenant irrespective of whether I end up renting to her or not. I think she does deserve a break and some help.

 

What should the tenant do next? Is it worth contacting EE or Lowell or CAB about the CCJ?

How would she fight the backdoor CCJ and be able to set the aside the decision if Lowell are the debt owner?

Can she challenge EE/Lowell over selling her debt (one of debts falls after GDPR came into effect)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Andyorch said:

There should be a date after the discharged entry.

 

A CCJ will be on your credit report for 6 years from the date of judgement/decree. Also, the date the CCJ is terminated from the Court will reflect as the 'Discharged Date' on their Clear Score report, hence if you can see that 'discharged: undefined ' it means that the CCJ is still active

She uses Clear Score and there is no "discharge: undefined" just "discharged", so what does that mean?

That sounds to me, like the CCJ is not active but she owes Lowell? I assume she has had no contact from them at this point. Surely you are not hinting that she should do nothing? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its discharged then I assume means is no longer.....discharged means you're freed from your debts......a CCJ is normally only marked satisfied..... if paid.

If it was over 6 years it wouldn't show. on the CRA.

 

Discharged is usually connected to Bankruptcy or Debt Relief Order Process...when a CCJ has been placed into this process...and discharged.

 

I dont suppose shes been a Bankrupt or had a DRO ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Andyorch said:

If its discharged then I assume means is no longer.....discharged means you're freed from your debts......a CCJ is normally only marked satisfied..... if paid.

If it was over 6 years it wouldn't show. on the CRA.

 

Discharged is usually connected to  Bankruptcy or Debt Relief Order Process...when a CCJ has been placed into this process...and discharged.

 

I dont suppose shes been a Bankrupt or had a DRO ?

 

I don't think she is registered bankrupt. DRO, I will have to ask.

However, Lowell are well known for buying out debt from other companies, which makes me think a debt could be chased. Especially if EE (other mobile phone companies are available) are happy to sell on debt on accounts.

Selling on account/debt details without consent is a big No-No in my eyes, surely it breaks GDPR rules...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the best option to save anyone embarrassment is to speak to Clearscore and ask what does this marker  " Discharged "actually indicate ? 

I have looked at their website and their is no mention in their acronyms.

 

As the Landlord...Lowell are really of no concern to yourself and how their business model works.........if you have a few spare hours there is plenty on here about DCAs and debt assignment. If they do chase her its not your problem or liability...nor are the CCJs....IMHO.

 

Debt Assignment has no connection to GDPR.....

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

She is a single mum with 2 kids and is a DSS tenant.  We have interviewed the tenant, she is genuine and honest person,   a good single mum that work hard to feed the kids.  She has been renting the current place for 8 years, due to the landlord wants to sell the property she has no choice but to look for another place to rent.

 

Reading your initial post again....

 

I think all the above is reason enough to agree the tenancy .....without insurance.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

RGI sounds great but, just like any insurance product, give the insurer the slightest excuse and they'll wriggle out of paying faster than a speeding bullet.

 

Use your own judgement to decide if the prospective tenant is a good and reliable person, or not.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...