Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Direct tiles Warehouse - Faulty Tiles - Claim Issued


kammx4
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1033 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You really need to start reading a few other threads and learn the process and what mediation actually is and what it entails.

 

Opting for mediation....as the court expects all parties to participate..you have complied...no risk to costs or amount claimed...mediation could fail and the claim proceeds to a hearing.....mediation may be a success...you get paid....and you wont have to pay the next fee to proceed to a hearing...thats a saving of £335.00

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • AndyOrch changed the title to Direct tiles Warehouse - Faulty Tiles - Claim Issued

Looking at their new particularised defence....something which I picked up on recently.......the following is very detrimental to your claim 

 

Quote

2. The Defendant avers that the Defendant has failed to exercise the short term and final right of rejection pursuant to the Section 20 and 22 of the Act and accepted ownership of the tiles following delivery in that:

 

a) The Defendant delivered the tiles on 20th April 2018 to the Claimant as confirmed in the Claimants letter dated 20th February 2020

 

b) The Claimant failed to properly inspect the tiles on the date of delivery and later affixed them but did not make any complaint to the Defendant about the quality of the tiles until a complaint was received by the Defendant on 20th November 2018 some 7 months later when the tiles had been affixed.

 

 

As for what happens next .......again you really should be reading around to find out the process......obviously mediation next.....if that fails ...then the claim proceeds to a hearing and the court issues further directions.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I checked the tiles upon delivery and after checking for the things stated in the terms couldn't see anything wrong with the size, shade and colour of the tiles. Ive also a letter from the installer that he checked the tiles visually before laying each one.

 

Only after grouting the tiles at the 2nd stage of laying after various issues, personal and with the installer, did this issue become apparent.

 

After raising this issue with DTW did they ask me if any other tiles were like this did we check  and noticed others but not nearly as bad as some. I believe under CRA i can raise an issue 6 years after.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough and I suppose your claim does not rely on " failed to exercise the short term and final right of rejection pursuant to the Section 20 and 22 of the Act  " 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15/notes/division/3

 

You have six years to take a claim to the small claims court for faulty goods in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and five years in Scotland. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I think we may have asked you before to post up your documents in PDF format these.

It's important that you help us by presenting documents properly so that they are readable not only by us but also by anybody else who might want to help you all who might have the same problem – for instance is using a small screen such as a telephone

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, kammx4 said:

Hi at last i've received this from the court and wondered what this means Thanks..

 

 

What it states...if you the claimant does not file a breakdown by 12.00pm on the 12th May  a breakdown of the amounts claimed...they will strikeout your claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Submit it as a Statement...signed with Statement of truth...its not a detailed report simply a breakdown of how you arrived at the total figure claimed with justified costs.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes please. Present it here.

You want to do something in a kind of spreadsheet format where you itemise all the various expenses/costs – and at the end they total up to you what you are claiming.

I suggest that you use a spreadsheet. In the left-hand column you have the title of the expense. Then you have the actual £figure in the next column – and then in a third column you can put any notes or comments you want.

Try that and present it here

You would then send a copy to the other side and also a copy to the court

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just noticed that last year there was a conversation between the OP and my site team colleague @Andyorch about the defence claim that you had failed to use your right to reject.
They seem to think that it's very significant.

I think the right to reject is precisely that – a right – it's not a duty.

There is nothing so far as I'm aware in the Consumer Rights Act that suggest that you have to follow a particular process. There is nothing In the Consumer Rights Act which suggests that the act replaces or supplants the existing common law of contract in any way.

The Consumer Rights Act provides additional clarity and provides additional routes to solve problems – but the roots are exactly that "additional".

I think this would be your argument that even if you had the right to reject, you were under no obligation to use the right – because it is a right not a duty – and it is up to you to choose the basic principles of contract

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this problem with these particular tiles is not apparent to the naked eye and and basic inspection which would arise before the 7 days. All the tiles were inspected before the 7 days. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fine. Simply please go ahead and prepare the detailed statement of damages

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also...and this is important...you have not updated your topic since Nov 2020 since submitting your directions questionnaire and the order you have just posted is known as an " Unless Order "....is there anything else you have not done since submitting your DQ ?

 

Did the court not send you a Notice of Allocation (N157) with its directions or a previous order to the one you have just uploaded.

 

You don't want to lose this claim on a technicality   

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as i'm aware i'm all up tp date with any correspondence with the courts. I've asked the clerk at the court to double check for me.

 

No notice of allocation received by the court so i'll have to do one and send asap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant do one ....the court send it out when the claim is ready to proceed...I was just checking to make sure you had not missed it.

They should issue one when you have submitted your latest statement of breakdown.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mmmm not really a breakdown of costs by penny just a reiterate of your particulars of claim...you need to breakdown this £5k and account for every penny.

 

Re the N157 you do not send this form to the court ..they send it to you after you have submitted your N180 Directions Questionnaire.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...