Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The digital bank has introduced three new plans - Extra, Perks and Max - replacing its existing Plus and Premium plans for new customers.View the full article
    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Discussion Sec 14 Statutory Declaration - can it be done by post?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1496 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Does it need to be an appointment or can you send it by post?


 

Quote

 

@honeybee13

 

8 hours ago, divination said:

Does it need to be an appointment or can you send it by post?

 

Hello and welcome to CAG. If you have a similar problem, it's best to start a new thread of your own. This one is for advising webboooo.

 

Best, HB

 


 

Quote

 

@Bailiff Advice

 

8 hours ago, divination said:

Does it need to be an appointment or can you send it by post?

 

If a person has received correspondence or a visit from a bailiff, then almost certainly, he would want to have enforcement placed 'on hold' as quickly as possible and this will NOT be achieved by sending a Section 14 Statutory Declaration by post.

 

If a Section 14 Statutory Declaration is submitted by post, then he or she will receive a letter  from the court advising of the date and time when the individual will be required to attend a hearing IN PERSON.

 

 

 

 

Surely via post it can be at the court in 1-2 days.

Doesn't that put enforcement on hold?

 

How long will an appointment take?

Will they even be making appointments due to Covid19?

 

What happens at the appointment anyway?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

own thread created

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot make an SD by post. It has to be made in person.

 

To avoid delay, instead of waiting for a court appointment you can make your SD before a solicitor.

They will make a small charge of £5-£10. You can then send the witnessed SD to the relevant court.

You can also make your SD before an officer of the armed forces of the rank of Major/Squadron Leader/Lieutenant-Commander or above.

 

It may be easier to find a solicitor, though, as I doubt many of those members of the forces know they are authorised to witness an SD or how to do so.

 

7 hours ago, divination said:

What happens at the appointment anyway?

 

You will be given a copy of the SD pro-forma to complete.

You need to enter your personal details and the details of the court case which led to the bailiff action.

 

You then need to verbally declare the information on the form before the person hearing your SD.

That person will not enquire into the truth of your declaration but will (or should) warn you that to make a false declaration will be an offence under the perjury act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course you can make it by post by getting it signed as you say then posting it. Even says it on the offical form.

 

I was more concerned with what happens if you attend court to do the SD.

Do you need to make a plea as well?

Edited by divination
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to fine for no car tax - Sec 14 Statutory Declaration - can it be done by post?

Then you must go before either a magistrate or a solicitor to make your SD. You cannot do this entirely by post. You must attend in person to make your SD in front of the person who is certifying it.

 

If you make it before a solicitor, once you have it certified then it can be sent by post to the court which imposed the fine. This has the effect of setting aside your conviction and fine and you will face the charge afresh.

 

If you make your SD in a Magistrates' Court you will almost certainly be asked to enter a plea to the original offence once your SD has been accepted.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair, I never said it can be done entirely by post, but questioned whether an appointment to attend the court was the only way or if you could send the SD to the court. The reply was that you'd still need to attend the court at some point, but that wasn't the issue.

 

I said that surely it's quicker to send the SD to the court by post, the result being enforcement paused on receipt rather than wait for an appointment to swear the SD at court, an appointment that could be days or a week away, or with the Covid19 situation even longer.

 

Advice that you must 'make an appointment' also doesn't consider whether the sentencing court is nearby or not.

 

For me if it was a choice of sending a sworn SD by 1st class signed for which would see enforcement paused within 48 hours, or making an appointment to attend the court at who knows when with enforcement remaining live until you attend the appointment, then the postal option wins every time.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be even fairer, I didn't suggest you must wait for a court appointment. In fact I made it clear that you need not: 

 

23 hours ago, Man in the middle said:

To avoid delay, instead of waiting for a court appointment you can make your SD before a solicitor.

They will make a small charge of £5-£10. You can then send the witnessed SD to the relevant court.

 

Your question asked whether the SD can be done by post, and it cannot. What happens after it has been "done" (i.e. sending it to the court) is a different question. But anyway, you seem to have hold of the right end of the stick.

 

1 hour ago, divination said:

Advice that you must 'make an appointment' also doesn't consider whether the sentencing court is nearby or not.

 

You can make an SD at any Magistrates' Court. It does not have to be the sentencing court.

 

But even at the best of times (and these are not the best of times) you will probably have to wait a couple of weeks for an appointment. If you make your SD before a solicitor you must serve it on the sentencing court within 21 days of learning of the proceedings that led to your conviction.

 

The same rule applies to those made in court but the court will accept a late SD if the reason you could not make it in time was because you could not get an earlier appointment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has become rather garbled and out of context due to it being split from another thread. The poster Bailiff Advice was the one who said you must make an appointment, I questioned as to whether it would be simpler to send it by post and a mod seemed to take umbrage and moved the question here.

Your mention of it being a couple of weeks for an appointment highlights what I'm saying - make it by post and enforcement is suspended sooner.

 

The official .gov SD document muddies the water as to which court you must serve the SD by stating:

 

Quote

Send or deliver the completed declaration to the court office for the magistrates’ court where the trial took place.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think (or hope) it's just terminology, but to emphasise: you cannot make your SD by post.

 

You must attend either a court (any Magistrates' Court) or a solicitor's in person to make it. After you've made it and had it certified it must be sent or delivered to the sentencing court.

 

If you make your SD at a solicitor's that job will fall on you. If you make it at a court, the court (if it is not the sentencing court) will do it for you.

 

Additionally, if you make it at a court (whether it is the sentencing court or not) you will almost certainly be asked to plead to the original offence immediately afterwards. If you plead guilty and the matter is straightforward you will be sentenced there and then. If you plead not guilty the matter will be adjourned for trial.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That does trouble me. How can it be proper to ask someone how they plead without that someone having viewed the evidence?

 

And yes, it's just terminology. Obviously you need to have a SD sworn before sending it. My terminology is simply stating you serve the sworn SD in two ways - make it in person at the court or make it by post. Just substitute 'make' with 'serve' if it helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we have heard this argument numerous times before and already been discussed to death over the years.

 

You have your answer.....why ask the question if you won't accept the advice given.

 

Topic closed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Discussion Sec 14 Statutory Declaration - can it be done by post?
  • AndyOrch locked this topic
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1496 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...