Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • i'd be sending them an sar get all the details and see if his bank has proof of BT cancelling the DD too. then p'haps we can make a complaint......   £800/12 is about £67pcm - thats an expensive deal if this is for BB only and not phone as well & at what speed - i'd expect >70MPS for that deal...was it.?   the issue here is if it is for phone as well BT won't release the line till the debt is cleared if he wanted & should switch - to say vodafone at <£30PCM for the same deal.
    • Am I able to upload it like the earlier ones today? It seems to be easiest way for me to do it on my fone 
    • nothing to do with any warranty or guarantee nor T&C's. and nothing to do with where you kept nor used it.   under the Consumer rights act you are entitled for upto 6yrs to have an item that is fit for purpose.   your item has failed within 6mts so under the CRA it is the retailer responsibility to inspect it and have ONE chance to repair it .. no quibble.   sadly as you purchased the item through paypal with your credit card i don't think you have any rights that way under section 75 of the consumer rights act.   @BankFodder will be around AM to help with how to move you forward possibly by a formal letter but safe to say Sweatband.com are taking you for a fool.
    • It is residential. Not long been self employed, and in between been employed.   Everything was set up by dd. BT even let them upgrade the Internet 2 months ago, but did not refuse on basis bill not paid. No letters, nothing and normally would cut you off after not paying for a month.   Yes they should check outgoings, but young couple, and everything by DD.  They obviously realised they made a mistake by halfing it. Just wanted advice really    I would also like to point out they are very financially aware, he earns good money, just didn't spot it wasn't coming out, nothing alerted him to the fact it wasn't 
    • £800 for one year?? what planet are you on?   i will guess this is residential Broadband not a business A/C?   however i do find it a bit strange that a self employer person does know when or not money is going out of your A/C one month maybe, but to not spot 12mts of not seeing a BB bill smacks of poor financial awareness..    
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

Cabot/Nolans SPC Claim - Newday Marbles Card


Recommended Posts

as they always say

plenty of nolan threads for you to read here

 

you have used our search top right and typed in nolans and been reading up haven't you?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

its a numbers game  they make (well actually that diff to know as a decree much like a CCJ can sit there for years not bring enforced. sad diff with a decree is its enforceable for 20yrs, bu

not at all none are silly questions, but what I will say is that your excellent self help has far advanced your understanding of things I really wish others would take that rouble as it

You dont repeat your defence Look at what i last posted    you briefly make statements around those points... focusing 1st upon what the sheriff ordered them to disclose and why th

yes, I've read almost every single one several times haha. Expenses are still capped to £150? I'm actually glad they have now brough the default notice issue on to the table. Now they have to answer to it.

 

This is the 2nd batch of documents sent with reference to caselaw for the lack of DN.

Section87caselaw.compressed.pdf

 

Any thoughts or help you can provide with this Dx? I'll probably need to submit my written submissions tonight or early tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having just read what they state .

Not very strong from them sadly...

 

Just a load of ole bunkum trying to convince the sheriff the scots law overrides the necessities of the consumer credit act. 

 

The fact you had that email exchange earlier before your form 7 return is immaterial.

 

I also find it strange they still believe section  4 requires a respondent to admit or deny  a debt before they produce the required paperwork under the cca which of course they are supposed to do at claim submission and clearly stated on the claimform they held

 

p'haps andyorch will pop in on the Dont need a dn bit before we write you basic return tonight.. before our full one due on the 11th

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I think it's a bit waffly too.

 

The e-mail correspondence I think I have covered my self. I stated in bold it was without prejudice and if asked by the sherrif I will also clarify like you said that at that point I had received no evidence in support of their claim. I was an inexperienced layman panicking at the thought of going to court and simply trying to settle the matter without prejudice and without acknowledging anything. Now that the matter is going through court I'm putting them to task to prove their legal right to enforce the debt.

 

Hopefully there is room to let the sherrif hang them, the sherrif wasn't impressed with their arrears argument at the last CMD. It was almost immediately after that sherrif called for the hearing. I don't know if that's good or bad for me. Their comments on the DN issue seem very waffly, lots of assumptions. They are basically saying something along the lines of "well the OC issued letters for other stuff, so they must have issed the DN". I find it hard to believe a sheriff will accept that. And they have a cheek to comment on the quality of my defence.

 

About them saying now it's for arrears, if I'm understanding correctly...

 

- If it was for arrears only, then the OC would still own the debt and Nolans would be acting for the OC? (which isn't the case)

- It would also be for missed payments and not the entire balance?

- if Cabot claim to own the debt (which they do), then the debt must have terminated & sold and a requirement before doing so would be the sec 87/88 default notice from the OC?

 

It's a very important part of the debt selling process that they seem to think isn't necessary.

 

I appreciate all your help Dx

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

working on a few notes for you now.

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the respondent has never admitted owing this debt outside of a previous without prejudice offer made by email. (add your bit in)

 

the claimant has included a copy of a generic deed from the original creditor covering a multiple debt portfolio purchase (as outlined in my defence) that is not a notice of assignment from the original creditor clearly stating the litigated debt has been sold to the claimant.

 

The respondent cannot intimate a denial nor admittance to claims made on form 4a as they are awaiting documentation from the claimant under a Section 78 CCA request or otherwise that the claimant clearly stated they held within their submittance on form 3a. Scottish Law does not overwrite nor remove the requirements under the consumer credit Act


4.4    What has to go in the Response Form?
(1)    The respondent must set out in the Response Form the following information:
(a)    which facts (if any) set out in the Claim Form that the respondent agrees with,
(b)    which facts (if any) set out in the Claim Form that the respondent disagrees with and why,
(c)    why the respondent thinks that the claimant should not get what was asked for in the Claim Form, or why the claimant should only get some of what was asked for in the Claim Form,
(d)    what steps the respondent has already taken (if any) to try to resolve the dispute with the claimant.
(2)    The respondent must indicate in the Response Form if the respondent thinks that there should be any additional respondents.
(3)    The respondent must list in the Response Form any documents, files, or other evidence that the respondent thinks support the response.
(4)    The respondent must list in the Response Form any witnesses that the respondent thinks support the response.

 

Promoloria RAM v Moore 2017 CSOH 88 is totally irrelevant to any proceedings and concerned a loan of some £14M, again this is nothing to do with nor would a loan of that value be ever covered by the consumer credit Act 1974.

 

The claimant can believe or make whatever assumptions they like as to what they think might have happened at the hearing of the 1st October, the respondent merely pointed out remembering having past financial dealing with the original creditor as intimated in my defence.

 

you have the default notice stuff to quote already.

 

add 
The claimant quotes section 87 and 88 of the consumer credit Act


sec 87 1 C clearly states a default notice must be issued to enforce any security. court action being such.

the claimant appears to be confusing the above with the need to only issue a Notice Of Sums In Arrears to claim only arrears. The Claimant is claiming the full outstanding balance not only arrears under the Agreement.

 

The credit agreement was terminated by the original creditor on or before sale . 

 

the Claimant cannot be a creditor so are not they able to Offer Credit, they are not registered as a Creditor with the governing body ...the FCA . 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx, you're a legend.

 

I'll get this knocked up in the morning and post here to let you see first.

 

The default notice stuff meaning from the draft I posted in post #68?

 

I meant to ask, so nolans haven't actually sent anything to me directly, they have submited a list of evidence (written submission) to the court. I assume this is their final written submission?

Should I still send this to them directly? or should I lodge it with the court?

 

Order states - written submissions exchanged by parties by 02/11

Final written submissions and evidence lodged to court by 11/11.

Edited by StandFirm11
Link to post
Share on other sites

how did nolans send theirs by email?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, to the court directly, but with a evidence court submission form attached which makes me think it's their final submission.

 

I wasn't copied into the e-mail and haven't received anything by post. I only came across it because I randomly checked the online portal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh so they have totally ignored what they were supposed to do and that is exchange initially between yourselves to narrow issues, then make a final submission direct to the court by the 11th.??

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes exactly they haven't sent anything to me and submitted a 10a List of evidence form with the written submission and docs I posted up here.

 

This is a copy and paste from the order

 

"The Sheriff, in Chambers, by way of teleconference call, having heard from parties, Continues the cause to 16 November 2020 at 10:00am as Hearing on submissions; Orders written submissions be exchanged between both Parties by no later than 2 November 2020; thereafter Ordersfinal Written Submissions, and any other documents either Party may rely on, be lodged with the Court no later than close of business on 11 November 2020"

 

I checked the e-mail that was also scanned up and it was sent directly to the court, I've not been copied in.

Edited by StandFirm11
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok great 

they haven't a clue what they are doing then.

 

forget sending anything to nolans

forget sending anything to the court till the 11th stuff 'em.

 

go ring the clerk tomorrow.

 

watch the word i use please...

 

tell them that nolans have ignored the specific orders of the sheriff made date xxxx and have filed directly to court without first trying to narrow the issues which you were welcome to do.

 

they have also failed to forward to the respondent any of the documents intimated in their list of evidence

has the Clark got them please?

 

you see little point in the judge making orders if the claimant do not abide by them, what is he going to do about it please?

 

i cannot complete my submission due on the 11th until i have copies of ALL the evidence the claimant relies upon.

 

the claimant imho opinion and sorry for swearing is taking the piss here we have already had one hearing that they failed to supply and were given even more time to disclose, they still have failed to date please advise.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, thanks DX, will do that first thing.

 

I am sorry though I just double checked the 10a list of evidence form and it's actually a further submission of arrears/accounts suspended letters etc. No default notice nothing that complies with section 87/88, just waffle.

 

But, they have still e-mailed the court directly with the written submission and not copied me in or sent anything to me.

 

I know it's a small change of details, should I still ring the clerk?

Link to post
Share on other sites

but you nor the court? have the actual documents in their list of evidence yet so where are they? 

they have now had 3 chances to disclose , they haven't.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

go through their written statement

list the productions they refer too like C1 C2 c3 c4

 

so those are the ones in the section 87 pdf.?

 

they still have not produced the default notice? ...sunk dead.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

C1 - E-mails from me
C2 - Letter attached e-mail with WOP offer
C3 - CCA electonically signed
C4 - Statements of account
C5 - Intimation of assignment - Letter from nolans I posted in #47 (attached to CCA).
C6 - deed of assignement (post #56)
C7 - Copy of suspended accounts letters - Letters advise of arrears and missed payment for that month.

That's everything they have submitted in evidence 10a forms.

 

So still
- No NOA from OC
- No DN

Link to post
Share on other sites

just to focus things.

i've put the deed and CCA return uploads here.

 

the deed ...the last page i will assume has a list of peoples debts that the deed covers (missed this)

the one not redacted shows a debt of the same value , what is the relevance of hamilton??

this looks like your debt, if it is

 

i'm not sure if a copy of the mass sales of debts under a porfilio covers their need for a specific document entitled 'notice of assignment.

 

however the letter with the CCA return is from Nolans , that certainly is not one

 

hopefully someone is going to pop in over the coming days to help.

 

i am also not happy with the fact hey have used your without prejudice email as an exhibit to court. 

 

dx

Marbles-Cabot-Nolans CCA return.pdf Cabot deed.pdf

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dx, Hamilton is is just the area/town. Yes, it appears to be my debt, I've just redacted my personal info.

 

Are you expecting a specific person to come in to help? it's just I think me and you are the only ones that have been posting here. I don't imagine a random someone else will now pop in and start offering help now.

 

Hoping to try and get this all put together today/tomorrow as deadline is Nov 11th. Any help would be appreciated as I expect them to pick apart anything I send as it likely won't be up to their "legal" standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesn't have to be upto any legal standard you are a litigant in person.

 

i would get a statement up here for us to be able to read/edit/help on.

main focus being the DN.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 04/11/2020 at 01:08, dx100uk said:

the respondent has never admitted owing this debt outside of a previous without prejudice offer made by email. (add your bit in)

 

the claimant has included a copy of a generic deed from the original creditor covering a multiple debt portfolio purchase (as outlined in my defence) that is not a notice of assignment from the original creditor clearly stating the litigated debt has been sold to the claimant.

 

The respondent cannot intimate a denial nor admittance to claims made on form 4a as they are awaiting documentation from the claimant under a Section 78 CCA request or otherwise that the claimant clearly stated they held within their submittance on form 3a. Scottish Law does not overwrite nor remove the requirements under the consumer credit Act


4.4    What has to go in the Response Form?
(1)    The respondent must set out in the Response Form the following information:
(a)    which facts (if any) set out in the Claim Form that the respondent agrees with,
(b)    which facts (if any) set out in the Claim Form that the respondent disagrees with and why,
(c)    why the respondent thinks that the claimant should not get what was asked for in the Claim Form, or why the claimant should only get some of what was asked for in the Claim Form,
(d)    what steps the respondent has already taken (if any) to try to resolve the dispute with the claimant.
(2)    The respondent must indicate in the Response Form if the respondent thinks that there should be any additional respondents.
(3)    The respondent must list in the Response Form any documents, files, or other evidence that the respondent thinks support the response.
(4)    The respondent must list in the Response Form any witnesses that the respondent thinks support the response.

 

Promoloria RAM v Moore 2017 CSOH 88 is totally irrelevant to any proceedings and concerned a loan of some £14M, again this is nothing to do with nor would a loan of that value be ever covered by the consumer credit Act 1974.

 

The claimant can believe or make whatever assumptions they like as to what they think might have happened at the hearing of the 1st October, the respondent merely pointed out remembering having past financial dealing with the original creditor as intimated in my defence.

 

you have the default notice stuff to quote already.

 

add 
The claimant quotes section 87 and 88 of the consumer credit Act


sec 87 1 C clearly states a default notice must be issued to enforce any security. court action being such.

the claimant appears to be confusing the above with the need to only issue a Notice Of Sums In Arrears to claim only arrears. The Claimant is claiming the full outstanding balance not only arrears under the Agreement.

 

The credit agreement was terminated by the original creditor on or before sale . 

 

the Claimant cannot be a creditor so are not they able to Offer Credit, they are not registered as a Creditor with the governing body ...the FCA . 

^^^^^ like

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX, I'll get something drafted up today.

 

Now they state in their written submission that they are claiming arrears. If I was able to find in my credit report an entry stating the default date. Would this be admissable? and should I go down this route?

 

This would challenge that their claim is actually for arrears, and would allow me to go on nicely to sec 87/88 where the DN is required if the debt as been terminated and sold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

evidence from your credit file that states in the SUMMARY section

defaulted DAte = xxxxx

you can produce

 

AND ofcourse the resultant entry below that says outstanding or balance £xxx will be fatal to them.

and will prove a default notice was issued by the OC so they need a copy of it or proof it was sent from the OC to litigate under sec 87/88.

 

well thats the way i read it from years on here and numerous cases mostly in england whereby failure to produce a copy of the dN has been fatal to a claim many many times.

 

i am leaning toward you making your statement  'a brief timeline' statement as they have rather than only retorting to theirs.

might make the story and it's issued seem more focussed to sheriff.

 

did we ever SAR newday? sorry on a small screen ..out sheep herding

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't SAR newday, no.

 

Do  you think it's risky looking into the credit file? as if a default is there, then could it also go against me and the assumption could be made that  as the debt has been defaulted on the credit file, it's reasonable to  assume the DN was also issued also?

 

The line of thinking was to trip them up. They say they are claiming arrears only, but if I can show a default date on my credit file, it may lead the sherrif to prompt further and ask why they have stated they are claiming arrears etc.

 

Also what is the real risk to me here, I don't want to consider losing of course but I need to understand the possible outcomes. I see costs are capped at £150, but they can ask for additional expenses etc in some cases which they no doubt will.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...