Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Ruthbridge chasing 13 Year old Capital One debt!! ***Resolved***


listless
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1490 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hmm very odd I wouldn't have anything of that sort with Barclays, how ever I did have credit cards with Them long ago though another SB case perhaps though I don't know how that would tie in

Link to post
Share on other sites

someone died you don't know about....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might have inherited and they cant find you....or they checked and your the wrong Mr Listless

 

https://www.fraserandfraser.co.uk/missing-beneficiaries-found/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrong Mr listless ..I like that . . Anyway no one could have died without me knowing only my mum's relatives live here all my dad's side are dead and long gone...

 

However now that did spring a bulb on my mind ....

 

earlier last year I did get a letter about PPI from Barclays,

I called them to say they were mistaken I didn't have PPI , to find out that it was for a catalogue account in the group apparently I had PPI on that as it was barely used , I said I wasnt interested

 

the woman was adamant and saying I do not have to give any details only the reference numbers on the letters and if it due they will send me a cheque addressed in my name, u smelled a rat and declined it ( one of the catalogues tried to do me over once while I wasn't in the country ), and she said she take me off the system and I wouldn't receive any further communication.

That was probably that entry in the first part of 2019,

 

The new ones use another initial still one of my initials Though ,

since no more PPI and no relatives ( unless someone took fancy on me)..

most bizzare but who knows I only hope it's not one of those pests 

Link to post
Share on other sites

was the letter from Barclays?

sounds like a ppi reclaims fleecer firm to me?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the letter was from Barclays early last year before the PPI deadline ,but no letter for the 2 latest searches, and I have referred back to that saved copy of the credit file from 2014 and I have had a Barclaycard with those initials  and the search btw is from Barclays apparently

Edited by listless
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest this is a plevin commission PPI payout.???

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again dx100uk,

I guess you may be correct but why would they run searches in November last year and again this year after I specifically told them I wasn't interested in pursuing this , and they told me it will be closed at the terminating of the call and I would receive any more communication . Besides I thought this PPI claiming deadline has passed now it was on TV a lot last year. The reason being I have had cc from them .

Link to post
Share on other sites

if it is a plevin refund, it's not a  PPI reclaim, it's the original creditor paying back what they have been mandated to do by the FCA.

 

Customers initialising complaints about PPI mis-selling yes did cease last august, however that doesn't absolve creditors from not paying back the total unlawful commission they might have gained If they got a commission backhander of greater than 50% for selling the policy to the customer.

 

the process of them wanting to give this back will be somewhat automated as the money will be sitting there and it's yours.

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 28/02/2020 at 10:19, Andyorch said:

To whoever sent you the letter in post #1...Cabot or Ruthbridge ?

 

The only point I would add to end of the letter is that they update all the files with your current address.

 

Andy

I

Fear I have made a mistake with the SB  letter i posted ,

i  edited the letter as to what you said to add but opened up the file now to see its different auto correct / spell check i suspect has changed it


instead of " update all the files with my  current address"

what is there is completely different must be something that i had saved in to the checker it says

only update your records as to the above only ,


shall i print out another letter and post again ?

or is sending 2 letters no good?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot are liars, the debt is statute barred. Nothing they can say or do can change that.

 

As above though, you must update them with your current address,

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, listless said:

i hope they dont pay that money back to the purchasers of the debt as they haven't contacted me again

They can't they sold the debt on.

but it wouldn't reset sb even if they did.

 

however it could explain why the dca has written to you......

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, London1971 said:

Cabot are liars, the debt is statute barred. Nothing they can say or do can change that.

 

As above though, you must update them with your current address,

Many thanks for your reply , shall I send the SB letter again(only sent it yesterday) shall i send the same again to ruthbridge by adding that text to the bottom of the letter? if so  should it be in the main body of the letter or as a post script after the digitally printed name ? i was thinking of something like this,

please send all communication to my address as above on this letter please update all your files with my current address.update all your files with my current address,
should add i do not admit liability for this debt too? and re- send the SB letter

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays dca who?

 

If you put your correct address on the sb letter sent

Dont repeat send.

This why we say dont adapt our letters!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays dca Lowell
 I only added i do not admit liability , but Andy said to include a note at the end of the letter to state update all their files with my current address , but spell checker has changed to "update your records as to the above only" at the bottom of the letter ,

 

my current address at the top is correct as they sent this letter to this address ,but Andy said they are known to send letters to previous addresses afterwards, ie: court papers as i didn't inform them when i moved away all those years ago

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have your correct address at the top.

if they do issue then that's all you need to have done to contest things.

 

stop worrying.

 

it extremely rare for lowells to sell debts on again, esp to a riva... the comment about it being a 'catalogue' doesn't fit with anything barclays, you must have heard wrong.

 

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again dx100uk,

Only worried as if they issue claim I wouldn't been know till they show up at my door this is my partner's place it's her property don't won't them coming out of the blue.thats all .

 

About Barclays I thought  the woman on the phone said the catalogue was owned by the group. 

But the cc' s were owned by Lowell's and when it was showing on the CRA back then was showing as Lowell's and Barclays too had entries but was showing as settled for the same accounts possibly because they sold them?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

listless

they HAVE YOUR ADDRESS

you wrote to them FROM IT

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does the SB letter say without prejudice ?

Excuse my ignorance, but I have thought that means can't be used latter as evidence in a court ?

Only because Google said so didn't think too much of it till now.

 

Just found out wescot is also owned by cabot

Link to post
Share on other sites

wetcloths are not owned by cabot.

 

doesn't matter it can't be used in court.

if the debt is SB'd not even a judge can unbar a debt.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I was working myself to death trolling the net past few days I came across this 

 

https://www.cabotcm.com/en/news/cabot-credit-management-plc-completes-acquisition-of-wescot-as-it-secures-a-major-outsourcing-contract/

 

Btw I managed to locate few of my other saved credit files looks like Cabot have done traces till at least 07 /2015,  and my last default 12 /2010 

 

 Is there anyway I can find out if anybody has initiated claims against me by contacting a court..

 

I know I know I do need as telling off but I remember those days well

 

I couldn't even afford payments for my long list of prescriptions not much better now ,

but was mentally a little bit better till last week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes ok sorry I forgot that acquisition, but it hasn't changed that wetcloths don't 'only' chase debts for cabot now.

they also have other clients.

the sb letter goes to cabot the debt owners or as you have their dogs..ruthbridge.

 

as for courts....

dca's don't contact courts..if you mean if they put in a court claim, that latterly resulted in the court sending out a claimform.

and without any contact, the claimant gaining a judgement

these would be shown on your credit file for 6yrs.

 

initiating a claim...will result in the above so you'd know about it, should it not have been defended, of which..ofcourse you must thus

know about!!

 

and don't forget anyorch's post correcting me earlier.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...