Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How much of the documentation have you seen from when probate was obtained? And do you have a copy of the original will? I can't remember. My thought about you making the decision on your own to go with another lawyer is that three of you are meant to be beneficiaries of this will trust, aren't you? Normally you would need to act together. HB
    • Octopus allows you to pay by variable Direct Debit, so you pay only for what you use but still benefit from DD pricing. That's what I've done ever we were SOLRed over to them in July 2022.
    • Hi guys, I am about to file my defence via email as cannot log in to the claim anymore.  Can you please advise if I can paste below and if it's good to go for now, or should I add anything else in?  Thanks!  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4.  The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.  1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of vehicle xxxx xxx.  2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant - Parking Eye LTD.  3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.   4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant.  5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.   6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Getting onto the ladder: The first-time buyer conundrumView the full article
    • Ooops - one to many also s..... my draft reply should read as:  Thank you for your response Mr Schnur  I set out my position quite clearly in my letter of claim and nothing has changed. Your insurance requirement is unlawful and is contrary to section 57 of the Consumer Rights Act, and also section 72 of the same statute. I would also refer you to the outcomes in PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729).  My deadline for action - 1 May 2024 - still stands, and if P2G wish to avoid the addition of court costs and interest to my claim, you may wish to respond positively before that date.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mis-sold Pension


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1509 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This has the potential to turn into a very long post, so I shall keep it as brief as I can.

 

I was mis-sold a pension by HSBC (Midland Bank at the time).

I was a teacher and was advised to opt out of Teachers Pensions early in my teaching career and then later was advised to opt back in.

I lost about a year and half of potential contributions to Teachers Pensions.

I thought HSBC were going to redress the situation.

Two years ago I discovered that they hadn't.

 

Since then I have emailed and written to HSBC with my complaint trying to get the situation redressed myself.

To date the bank has not responded to nor acknowledged any of my complaints.

I have not banked with HSBC since about 2000 so I suppose they think they can get away with it.

 

The last time I wrote, which was last December, I told them they had had more than enough time to look into my complaint and that if I did not hear back from them I would take it to the Financial Ombudsman.

I heard nothing by the date I gave them and the following day (9 January) made my complaint to the Ombudsman.

I have heard from the Ombudsman to say that they have received my complaint but that it is awaiting a case handler.

According to their website this could be as long as a 7 months wait!

 

I was retired from teaching 17 years ago on health grounds and have been in receipt of a pension that should have been more had HSBC bought back the lost contributions.

I am losing out financially every month, which has been pointed out to them in my complaint, but we are no further forward.

 

I don't seem to be able to get their attention over this matter.

Would it harm my case if I were to write again, this time telling them that it has gone to the Ombudsman, but threaten writing to their CEO or going public, going to Martin Lewis, Money Mail etc. just to get their attention?

 

I don't want to jeopardise anything by going public, so need some advice over what to do next as I don't know what I should do.

I'm trying to get this sorted out sooner than having to wait 7 months just for my case to be allocated to a handler.

 

I would welcome any suggestions please.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you were/are part of the LGPS and are now receiving that pension

and you fell for or were lead to believe the serp's buyout option in the 1990's ? was the best thing to do by midlands?

but latterly got out of that (well done) but it appears midlands didn't redistribute the pension period back to LGPS?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you take your complaint to the Pensions ombudsman not financail  Start off by contacting the Pensions Advosory Service ( same office as PO) and they will kick things off.

Can you prove that you have been in regulat contact with HSBC over this or you may be times out

Edited by ericsbrother
Link to post
Share on other sites

the ombudsman can force the pension provider to put you in the position you would have been if you hadnt taken their advice.

that is not the same as looking at missold pensions in a general sense, you have to have somthing concrete and i think you do.

 

Your problem is the time that has passed hence asking what correspondece you have and how often do you raise things with the bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see what you mean.

 

Although the mis-selling actually happened in the 90s,

long story short,

I thought it had been dealt with back then,

but then found out two years ago that there was a pension still in existence,

although by then it had been transferred or sold to ReAssure to manage.

 

 given that I have only been aware of this for under two years I do think I fall into the 3 years time limit.

I have been communicating with HSBC (not that they've reciprocated - they have ignored every communication sent) about the issue since last summer and have evidence of the correspondence sent (2 emails and 1 letter sent through the post which was signed for).

Link to post
Share on other sites

last letter then stating that if they fail to look at your complaint then you are entitled to seek a resolution form the ombudsman.

You have to follow the correct procedures so start off by asking for a copy of the scheme rules and disputes procedure. that itself may give you reason to go to the ombudsman. You then follow thiose rules and if they dotn act correctly you can go to the ombudman

 

See where we are going with this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do see where you are going with this, but when I originally decided I was going to make a complaint I followed HSBC's outline for making a complaint and they're not responding to me, hence me taking it to the financial ombudsman (case not been allocated yet, so I'm going to speak with the Pensions Advisory Service tomorrow and decide whether I need to withdraw that complaint and pursue through the Pensions Ombudsman instead) Are you saying that there should be a proper complaints procedure for this sort of complaint and that I may need to start the process all over again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

YES

 

you will need to know what the rules of the scheme are and then follow the complaint procedure or the ombudsman can nevr look at it. It they refuse to play ball you can make a complaint about that and they will be hit with a different stick but emailing them once every 17 years isnt the procedural route

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been on the phone to the Pensions Advisory Service and the Pensions Ombudsman today (they're not in the same office any more) and have been told my case is one for the Financial Ombudsman because it is based on the financial advice I was given all those years ago. Looks like I'm just going to have to wait for my turn for my case to be looked into. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...