Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

curry's accusing me of tampering with TV


watojules
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1515 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i can't believe the call ive just had from curry's,  i purchased a Tv from them March 2019  £1699  in November 2019 it developed a fault and stopped working so returned to them for repair , 4 weeks later tv was returned to me they had replaced mainboard, power supply board & screen everything was fine with the Tv for about 6 weeks then it stopped working again so 11 February they came to collect the tv again and  because it was an expensive tv i packed it safe & secure in the original box to go back to them, when  they collected it the driver took it to the van he took it out of the box and placed it on the floor of the van with two straps tightened over the screen without any protection then threw the box back in my garden.

 

I called customer service the same day and complained and told them if there were any damage to the screen i wasn't responsible, seven days later i had a call from curry's saying the tv was being returned to me un repaired because the engineer looking at it found a trace of adhesive on the motherboard inside the tv and believes its been tampered with ? so void of any repair, ive found out the   trace of adhesive has been found on the part they had previously replaced in November ?

 

Why would i want to tamper with the tv its still under the 12 month guarantee, if that wasn't bad enough the tv arrived back with me and there is a big dent in the side & deep scratch on the screen so i called customer service again  and the adviser told me the van driver had reported this damage was caused in transit when on the way to them for repair, so even though they have caused serious damage to it in transit conveniently they are saying because they found this trace of adhesive after they had already damaged it its void of any repair.

 

I would  really appreciate any advice regarding small claims court how to proceed, thanks Julie 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and Welcome to CAG

 

Have you retained paperwork from the first original fix ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then do that as you will need proof that their fix is the one that they are using as an excuse to not do the second fix.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the letter by way of an SAR so that it is a statutory request for disclosure. This will put them under a legal duty to supply you with everything and make it more likely that you will get the information you need.

Be careful of dealing with Currys/PC World. They quibble at almost every step

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

Send the letter by way of an SAR so that it is a statutory request for disclosure. This will put them under a legal duty to supply you with everything and make it more likely that you will get the information you need.

Be careful of dealing with Currys/ PC World. They quibble at almost every step

 

Oh correct indeed... 

Also aswell maybe consider emailing the CEO? Where did you purchase the TV? (What Store)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That will depend on how awkward they want to be as they should accept an email if they are happy that the email  is yours so let them know that you expect the data to be sent to your permanent home address or to this email address if they dont want to send a paper copy

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like small claims court is the only way forward, advice needed please, would you claim against the fact they are wrongfully accusing me of tampering and refusing to repair or the fact that when it was on the way back to them for repair it was damaged in transit a dent to the side & cracked screen reported by the driver, this serious  damage occurred before they even looked at the tv and allegedly found adhesive on the motherboard, any advise please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you sent them the SAR?

Do you still have the box which they threw in your garden?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That doesn't sound like an SAR and also I'm afraid that doing it that way creates no statutory duty.

You are probably going to find out with Currys that unless you are very very careful, you will lose control – and I would say that you are already losing control.

Send the SAR as I've suggested. It should have gone on Wednesday. Every day's delay will simply cause problems – particularly if you have to bring a legal action. You don't seem to realise that getting on the phone to them, part of what they do is to divert you and to distract you, to stop you getting control and eventually to tire you out. I'm not joking.

Send the SAR. Because you've delayed already, it won't be effective from at least Monday – Tuesday so that's a week lost.

 

Also of course because you been dealing with them on the telephone, you have no evidence of what has been agreed. Have you read our customer services guide? Do it now and implement the advice there. This is essential. Even when things are agreed on the telephone and you have got a recording of it, you should be following it up in writing to confirm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And the customer services guide???

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to be a pain but just one more thing, if this was to go all the way to court should i claim for the full cost of the tv £1699 or given it was 8 month old when developed the first fault would i be better claiming for a reduced amount 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say they you would claim for the full amount and then step back to a lower amount if necessary. However we are not there yet. Send the SAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Quote

                                  Requested the SAR, also a week ago i sent a detailed email to currys complaining about the way ive been accused also informing them i fully intend to take this to the small claims court,  yesterday i get a reply advising me to call customer service as they accept responsibility for damage in transit, i was reluctant to call because the 4 previous calls to them were a waste of time they insisted the engineers report regarding tampering was final and nothing could be changed, anyway yesterday morn i call  them and the guy i spoke to had a completely different attitude maybe something had been added to the case report? he was very understanding and apologized   he arranged to come and collect the tv back from me as they are fully responsible for full repair however he got the go ahead from his manager to recommend the tv to be wrote off by the repair team, so the tv's now back with them and im waiting for their response .  Thanks again for advice given by everyone.

 

 

  Requested the SAR, also a week ago.

 

i sent a detailed email to currys complaining about the way ive been accused also informing them i fully intend to take this to the small claims court, 

 

yesterday i get a reply advising me to call customer service as they accept responsibility for damage in transit,

i was reluctant to call because the 4 previous calls to them were a waste of time they insisted the engineers report regarding tampering was final and nothing could be changed,

anyway yesterday morn i call  them and the guy i spoke to had a completely different attitude

 

maybe something had been added to the case report?

he was very understanding and apologized  

he arranged to come and collect the tv back from me as they are fully responsible for full repair however he got the go ahead from his manager to recommend the tv to be wrote off by the repair team,

so the tv's now back with them and im waiting for their response . 

 

Thanks again for advice given by everyone.

Edited by BankFodder
Made it reasonable by introducing spacing. Didn't touch punctuation
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...